User contributions for LunaHasArrived
Appearance
A user with 718 edits. Account created on 20 January 2024.
29 April 2025
- 22:1322:13, 29 April 2025 diff hist +30 For Women Scotland Ltd v The Scottish Ministers Adding appropriate see also Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 21:0621:06, 29 April 2025 diff hist +826 Talk:For Women Scotland Ltd v The Scottish Ministers →Executive Order 14168: Reply Tag: Reply
- 21:0121:01, 29 April 2025 diff hist +57 For Women Scotland Ltd v The Scottish Ministers →See also: adding brief annotation to show relevance Tag: Visual edit: Switched
- 20:3120:31, 29 April 2025 diff hist +21 For Women Scotland Ltd v The Scottish Ministers Add appropriate see also Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 20:2920:29, 29 April 2025 diff hist +344 Talk:For Women Scotland Ltd v The Scottish Ministers →Executive Order 14168: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
- 20:1720:17, 29 April 2025 diff hist +160 Talk:LGB Alliance →Clarke source in lede: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
- 20:1420:14, 29 April 2025 diff hist +468 Talk:For Women Scotland Ltd v The Scottish Ministers →Executive Order 14168: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
- 18:4118:41, 29 April 2025 diff hist +27 For Women Scotland Ltd v The Scottish Ministers Re add, highly relevant as both relate to replacing gender with sex Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 15:4415:44, 29 April 2025 diff hist +95 For Women Scotland Adding the other publications used. Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 11:3011:30, 29 April 2025 diff hist +292 User talk:Sandstein →thank you: new section Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit New topic
28 April 2025
- 11:2611:26, 28 April 2025 diff hist +28 Rapid-onset gender dysphoria controversy Add appropriate see also current Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 10:5110:51, 28 April 2025 diff hist +374 Talk:Society for Evidence-Based Gender Medicine →Undark: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
- 10:4410:44, 28 April 2025 diff hist −8 Talk:For Women Scotland →Disingenuous POV phrasing: Fixed typo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 10:1910:19, 28 April 2025 diff hist +1,215 Talk:For Women Scotland →Disingenuous POV phrasing: Reply Tag: Reply
- 09:0009:00, 28 April 2025 diff hist +288 For Women Scotland Re adding source that was deleted due to a misunderstanding. Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 08:5908:59, 28 April 2025 diff hist +492 For Women Scotland Undid revision 1287761511 by Void if removed (talk) RV, this is strongly sourced from 3 different independent rs. Tags: Undo Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 00:1800:18, 28 April 2025 diff hist +2 For Women Scotland Ltd v The Scottish Ministers Let's follow the source here Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
27 April 2025
- 23:2423:24, 27 April 2025 diff hist +2 m For Women Scotland Ltd v The Scottish Ministers No edit summary Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 16:5316:53, 27 April 2025 diff hist +341 Talk:For Women Scotland Ltd v The Scottish Ministers →‘the decision to shut out from the hearing…’: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
- 09:3709:37, 27 April 2025 diff hist +51 Society for Evidence-Based Gender Medicine Change into its own paragraph as it is its own different belief, re add that it's all ages not just under 25s. Reword exceptional claim cited to unexceptional source so the claim is less exceptional. current Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 09:1909:19, 27 April 2025 diff hist +430 Talk:Society for Evidence-Based Gender Medicine →Undark: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
24 April 2025
- 14:2214:22, 24 April 2025 diff hist +54 Sex Matters (advocacy group) Adding appropriate see also current Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 14:2114:21, 24 April 2025 diff hist +54 For Women Scotland Adding appropriate see also Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 13:4113:41, 24 April 2025 diff hist −12 For Women Scotland Ltd v The Scottish Ministers Undid revision 1287170743 by 86.187.233.247 (talk) don't start edit warring. Tags: Undo Mobile edit Mobile web edit
23 April 2025
- 23:0523:05, 23 April 2025 diff hist +82 Talk:For Women Scotland Ltd v The Scottish Ministers →Is "cisgender" a neutral term?: Added to own comment Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 23:0023:00, 23 April 2025 diff hist +462 Talk:For Women Scotland Ltd v The Scottish Ministers →Is "cisgender" a neutral term?: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
- 22:3522:35, 23 April 2025 diff hist +660 Talk:For Women Scotland →Disingenuous POV phrasing: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
- 19:2219:22, 23 April 2025 diff hist −498 For Women Scotland Ltd v The Scottish Ministers Removing clear synth Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 14:4214:42, 23 April 2025 diff hist +3,005 For Women Scotland RV vandalism Tag: Undo
- 13:0913:09, 23 April 2025 diff hist +1,939 For Women Scotland Undid revision 1287014362 by 2A02:C7E:5CFF:1E00:6537:EAAE:7CFB:B30F (talk) RV removal of well cited content Tags: Undo Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 13:0313:03, 23 April 2025 diff hist +204 Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Increase →For Women Scotland: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
22 April 2025
- 13:5913:59, 22 April 2025 diff hist +416 Talk:For Women Scotland Ltd v The Scottish Ministers →Quotes by J K Rowling, and of what was written on statues: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
- 11:3711:37, 22 April 2025 diff hist +732 Talk:For Women Scotland Ltd v The Scottish Ministers →Quotes by J K Rowling, and of what was written on statues: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
- 11:0711:07, 22 April 2025 diff hist +224 Talk:For Women Scotland Ltd v The Scottish Ministers →Quotes by J K Rowling, and of what was written on statues: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
- 08:5708:57, 22 April 2025 diff hist +1 m LGB Alliance Ce Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 07:1507:15, 22 April 2025 diff hist +285 Talk:For Women Scotland Ltd v The Scottish Ministers →Quotes by J K Rowling, and of what was written on statues: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
21 April 2025
- 23:4823:48, 21 April 2025 diff hist −524 For Women Scotland Ltd v The Scottish Ministers Reasoning on talk. Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 23:4323:43, 21 April 2025 diff hist +540 Talk:For Women Scotland Ltd v The Scottish Ministers →Quotes by J K Rowling, and of what was written on statues: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
20 April 2025
- 22:0922:09, 20 April 2025 diff hist +282 User talk:Your Friendly Neighborhood Sociologist →Edit summaries: Reply current Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
- 22:0822:08, 20 April 2025 diff hist −6 For Women Scotland Ltd v The Scottish Ministers Neither source says spray paint, looking at the picture provided by the BBC it's clearly chalk not spray paint. Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 21:4121:41, 20 April 2025 diff hist +545 User talk:Your Friendly Neighborhood Sociologist →Edit summaries: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
- 21:3021:30, 20 April 2025 diff hist +235 Talk:Gender-critical feminism →"general tenets": Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
- 19:2419:24, 20 April 2025 diff hist +259 Talk:Gender-critical feminism →"general tenets": Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
- 15:5615:56, 20 April 2025 diff hist +328 Talk:Gender-critical feminism →"general tenets": Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
- 13:5413:54, 20 April 2025 diff hist −547 Gender-critical feminism Undid revision 1286521738 by Sweet6970 (talk) Clear OR using primary sources, neither of which mention gender critical. Also lead follows body applies here. Tags: Undo Reverted
- 12:2112:21, 20 April 2025 diff hist +503 Talk:For Women Scotland Ltd v The Scottish Ministers →significance: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
- 08:1908:19, 20 April 2025 diff hist +822 Talk:For Women Scotland Ltd v The Scottish Ministers →significance: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
19 April 2025
- 14:2114:21, 19 April 2025 diff hist +562 Talk:For Women Scotland →Disingenuous POV phrasing: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
- 10:2510:25, 19 April 2025 diff hist −32 For Women Scotland Ltd v The Scottish Ministers Undid revision 1286352859 by CS012831 (talk) not opposed to splitting up responses, but this way doesn't seem to work well (BTP and LGB alliance don't speak to me as political groups) Tags: Undo Mobile edit Mobile web edit
18 April 2025
- 23:0123:01, 18 April 2025 diff hist +2 m J. K. Rowling Link Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit