Abstract
In educational contexts, interpersonal attributional theory (Weiner, 2019) posits that teachers’ beliefs about the causes underlying their students’ academic performance vary along the causal dimensions of locus of causality, stability, personal controllability, and others’ controllability. Based on this framework, this study aimed at identifying teachers’ attribution profiles based on their perceptions about the causes of their students’ achievements. Two hundred eighty-nine experienced and novice French primary school teachers reported their causal beliefs about a student’s success or failure at a reading test, as well as their emotional and behavioral reactions to their student’s outcome. The data were analyzed using latent profile analyses, which identified five teachers’ attribution profiles that varied on the four causal dimensions. The results showed that profile memberships were greatly determined by the student’s outcome valence: three teachers’ attribution profiles were especially related to failure and two additional profiles to success. Profile memberships were associated with various cognitive, emotional, and behavioral reactions in line with the interpersonal attributional theory of motivation. The powerless profile — high external and uncontrollable attributions — indicated the lowest level of helping behavior. The conscientious profile — high internal and controllable attributions — indicated the highest levels of pride and student’s responsibility. Overall, these results partially support Weiner’s interpersonal attributional theory of motivation using a person-centered approach.

Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Reliability information of the four subscales of the CDSII is reported in the “Results” section.
See supplementary materials for LPA conducted on failure and success conditions separately. The results are similar.
References
Akaike, H. (1973). Maximum likelihood identification of Gaussian autoregressive moving average models. Biometrika, 60(2), 255–265. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/60.2.255.
Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2014). Auxiliary variables in mixture modeling: Three-step approaches using Mplus. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 21(3), 329–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.915181.
Bakk, Z., & Vermunt, J. K. (2016). Robustness of stepwise latent class modeling with continuous distal outcomes. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 23(1), 20–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.955104.
Bar-Tal, D., & Guttmann, J. (1981). A comparison of teachers’, pupils’ and parents’ attributions regarding pupils’ academic achievements. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 51(3), 301–311. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1981.tb02488.x.
Bauer, D. J., & Curran, P. J. (2004). The integration of continuous and discrete latent variable models: Potential problems and promising opportunities. Psychological Methods, 9(1), 3–29. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989x.9.1.3.
Bertrand, M., & Marsh, J. A. (2015). Teachers’ sensemaking of data and implications for equity. American Educational Research Journal, 52(5), 861–893. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831215599251.
Bolck, A., Croon, M., & Hagenaars, J. (2004). Estimating latent structure models with categorical variables: One-step versus three-step estimators. Political Analysis, 12(1), 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mph001.
Bozdogan, H. (1987). Model selection and Akaike’s information criterion (AIC): The general theory and its analytical extensions. Psychometrika, 52(3), 345–370. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294361.
Burger, J. M., Cooper, H. M., & Good, T. L. (1982). Teacher attributions of student performance: Effects of outcome. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 8(4), 685–690. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167282084013.
Butler, R. (1994). Teacher communications and student interpretations: Effects of teacher responses to failing students on attributional inferences in two age groups. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 64(2), 277–294. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1994.tb01102.x.
Cooper, H. M., & Burger, J. M. (1980). How teachers explain students’ academic performance: A categorization of free response academic attributions. American Educational Research Journal, 17(1), 95–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312017001095.
Cooper, H. M., & Lowe, C. A. (1977). Task information and attributions for academic performance by professional teachers and roleplayers. Journal of Personality, 45(4), 469–483. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1977.tb00165.x.
Dong, Y., & Peng, C.-Y. J. (2013). Principled missing data methods for researchers. SpringerPlus, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-2-222.
Dutrévis, M., & Toczek, M.-C. (2007). Perception des disciplines scolaires et sexe des élèves : le cas des enseignants et des élèves de l’école primaire en France. L’Orientation Scolaire et Professionnelle, 36(3), 379–400. https://doi.org/10.4000/osp.1469.
Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41(10), 1040–1048. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.41.10.1040.
Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95(2), 256–273. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.256.
Enders, C. K. (2010). Applied missing data analysis. Guilford.
Espinoza, P., da Luz Fontes, A. B. A., & Arms-Chavez, C. J. (2014). Attributional gender bias: Teachers’ ability and effort explanations for students’ math performance. Social Psychology of Education, 17(1), 105–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-013-9226-6.
Fennema, E., Peterson, P. L., Carpenter, T. P., & Lubinski, C. A. (1990). Teachers’ attributions and beliefs about girls, boys, and mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 21(1), 55–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00311015.
Fontayne, P., Martin-Krumm, C., Buton, F., & Heuzé, J. P. (2003). Validation française de la version révisée de l’échelle de mesure des attributions causales (CDSII). Les Cahiers Internationaux de Psychologie Sociale, 58, 59–72.
Georgiou, S. N. (2008). Beliefs of experienced and novice teachers about achievement. Educational Psychology, 28(2), 119–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410701468716.
Georgiou, S. N., Christou, C., Stavrinides, P., & Panaoura, G. (2002). Teacher attributions of student failure and teacher behavior toward the failing student. Psychology in the Schools, 39(5), 583–595. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.10049.
Gosling, P. (1994). The attribution of success and failure: The subject/object contrast. European journal of psychology of education, 9(1), 69–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03172886.
Graham, S. (2020). An attributional theory of motivation. An attributional theory of motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101861. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101861.
Graham, S., & Williams, C. (2009). An attributional approach to motivation in school. In K. R. Wenzel & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Educational psychology handbook series. Handbook of motivation at school (p. 11–33) Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
Guskey, T. R. (1982). Differences in teachers’ perceptions of personal control of positive versus negative student learning outcomes. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 7(1), 70–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-476X(82)90009-1.
Hall, B. W., Villeme, M. G., & Burley, W. W. (1989). Teachers’ attributions for students’ academic success and failure and the relationship to teaching level and teacher feedback practices. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 14(2), 133–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-476X(89)90031-3.
Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relationships. Wiley.
Holloway, S. D., & Hess, R. D. (1985). Mothers’ and teachers’ attributions about children’s mathematics performance. Parental belief systems: The psychological consequences for children, 177–199.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118.
Jager, L., & Denessen, E. (2015). Within-teacher variation of causal attributions of low achieving students. Social Psychology of Education, 18(3), 517–530. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-015-9295-9.
Kulinna, P. H. (2007). Teachers’ attributions and strategies for student misbehavior. The Journal of Classroom Interaction, 42, 21–30.
Leyens, J.-P., Yzerbyt, V. Y., & Schadron, G. (1992). The social judgeability approach to stereotypes. European Review of Social Psychology, 3(1), 91–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/14792779243000032.
Lo, Y., Mendell, N., & Rubin, D. (2001). Testing the number of components in a normal mixture. Biometrika, 88(3), 767–778.
Lubke, G., & Muthén, B. O. (2007). Performance of factor mixture models as a function of model size, covariate effects, and class-specific parameters. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(1), 26–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510709336735.
Marsh, H. W., Hau, K.-T., & Wen, Z. (2004). In Search of Golden Rules: Comment on Hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler’s (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 11(3), 320–341. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1103_2.
Matteucci, M. C. (2007). Teachers facing school failure: The social valorization of effort in the school context. Social Psychology of Education, 10(1), 29–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-006-9011-x.
Matteucci, M. C., Tomasetto, C., Selleri, P., & Carugati, F. (2008). Teacher judgments and pupils’ causal explanations: Social valorization of effort-based explanations in school context. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 23(4), 421–432. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03172750.
McAuley, E., Duncan, T. E., & Russell, D. W. (1992). Measuring causal attributions: The revised Causal Dimension Scale (CDSII). Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18(5), 566–573. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167292185006.
McDonald, R. P. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Lawrence Erlbaum.
McLachlan, G., & Peel, D. (2000). Finite Mixture Models. Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471721182.
Miller, D. T., & Ross, M. (1975). Self-serving biases in the attribution of causality: Fact or fiction? Psychological Bulletin, 82(2), 213–225. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076486.
Morin, A. J. S., Boudrias, J.-S., Marsh, H. W., Madore, I., & Desrumaux, P. (2016a). Further reflections on disentangling shape and level effects in person-centered analyses: An illustration exploring the dimensionality of psychological health. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 23(3), 438–454. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2015.1116077.
Morin, A. J. S., Boudrias, J.-S., Marsh, H. W., McInerney, D. M., Dagenais-Desmarais, V., Madore, I., & Litalien, D. (2016b). Complementary variable- and person-centered approaches to the dimensionality of psychometric constructs: Application to psychological wellbeing at work. Journal of Business and Psychology, 32(4), 395–419. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-016-9448-7.
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998-2017). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Muthén &Muthén.
Natale, K., Viljaranta, J., Lerkkanen, M. K., Poikkeus, A. M., & Nurmi, J. E. (2009). Cross-lagged associations between kindergarten teachers’ causal attributions and children’s task motivation and performance in reading. Educational Psychology, 29(5), 603–619. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410903165912.
Nylund, K. L., Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. O. (2007). Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(4), 535–569. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701575396.
Osborne, D., & Weiner, B. (2015). A latent profile analysis of attributions for poverty: Identifying response patterns underlying people’s willingness to help the poor. Personality and Individual Differences, 85, 149–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.05.007.
Pirrone, C. (2012). The influence of teachers’ preexisting notions about students on scholastic achievement. AASA Journal of Scholarship and Practice, 9(2), 18–28.
Prawat, R. S., Byers, J. L., & Anderson, A. H. (1983). An attributional analysis of teachers’ affective reactions to student success and failure. American Educational Research Journal, 20(1), 137–152. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312020001137.
Reyna, C. (2000). Lazy, dumb, or industrious: When stereotypes convey attribution information in the classroom. Educational Psychology Review, 12(1), 85–110. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009037101170.
Reyna, C. (2008). Ian is intelligent but Leshaun is lazy: Antecedents and consequences of attributional stereotypes in the classroom. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 23(4), 439–458. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03172752.
Reyna, C., & Weiner, B. (2001). Justice and utility in the classroom: An attributional analysis of the goals of teachers’ punishment and intervention strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(2), 309–319. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.93.2.309.
Rolison, M. A., & Medway, F. J. (1985). Teachers’ expectations and attributions for student achievement: Effects of label, performance pattern, and special education intervention. American Educational Research Journal, 22(4), 561–573. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312022004561.
Rubin, D. B. (1987). Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. John Wiley & Sons.
Schafer, J. L. (1997). Analysis of Incomplete Multivariate Data. Chapman & Hall, London. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781439821862.
Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. The Annals of Statistics, 6(2), 461–464. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176344136.
Sclove, S. L. (1987). Application of model-selection criteria to some problems in multivariate analysis. Psychometrika, 52(3), 333–343. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02294360.
Tollefson, N., & Chen, J. S. (1988). Consequences of teachers’ attributions for student failure. Teaching and Teacher Education, 4(3), 259–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/0742-051X(88)90005-4.
Tollefson, N., Melvin, J., & Thippavajjala, C. (1990). Teachers’ attributions for students’ low achievement: A validation of Cooper and Good’s attributional categories. Psychology in the Schools, 27(1), 75–83. https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6807(199001)27:1<75::AID-PITS2310270111>3.0.CO;2-%23.
Upadyaya, K., Viljaranta, J., Lerkkanen, M. K., Poikkeus, A. M., & Nurmi, J. E. (2012). Cross-lagged relations between kindergarten teachers’ causal attributions, and children’s interest value and performance in mathematics. Social Psychology of Education, 15(2), 181–206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-011-9171-1.
Vermunt, J. K. (2010). Latent class modeling with covariates: Two improved three-step approaches. Political Analysis, 18(4), 450–469. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpq025.
Wang, H., & Hall, N. C. (2018). A systematic review of teachers’ causal attributions: Prevalence, correlates, and consequences. Frontiers in psychology, 9, 2305. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02305.
Weiner, B. (1979). A theory of motivation for some classroom experiences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71(1), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.71.1.3.
Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92(4), 548–573. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.92.4.548.
Weiner, B. (1986). An attributional theory of motivation and emotion. Springer-Verlage. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4948-1.
Weiner, B. (1995). Judgments of responsibility: A foundation for a theory of social conduct. Guilford Press.
Weiner, B. (2000). Intrapersonal and interpersonal theories of motivation from an attributional perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 12(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1009017532121.
Weiner, B. (2001). An attributional approach to perceived responsibility. In Responsibility: The many faces of a social phenomenon, eds A. E. Auhangen and H. W. Bierhoff (New York, NY: Routledge), 49–60.
Weiner, B. (2005). Motivation from an attribution perspective and the social psychology of perceived competence. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of Competence and Motivation (pp. 73–84). The Guilford Press.
Weiner, B. (2006). Social motivation, justice, and the moral emotions. Erlbaum. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410615749.
Weiner, B. (2010). The development of an attribution-based theory of motivation: A history of ideas. Educational psychologist, 45(1), 28–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520903433596.
Weiner, B. (2019). My journey to the attribution fields. In Advances in motivation science (Vol. 6, pp. 185-211). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.adms.2018.08.002
Weiner, B., & Kukla, A. (1970). An attributional analysis of achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 15(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0029211.
Woodcock, S., & Jiang, H. (2013). Teachers’ causal attributional responses of students with learning disabilities in China. Learning and Individual Differences, 25, 163–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2013.01.016.
Woolfson, L. M., & Brady, K. (2009). An investigation of factors impacting on mainstream teachers’ beliefs about teaching students with learning difficulties. Educational Psychology, 29(2), 221–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410802708895.
Yehudah, Y. B. (2002). Self-serving attributions in teachers’ explanations of students’ performance in a national oral essay competition. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 30(4), 411–415. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2002.30.4.411.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Author’s personal details
Laurent Brun. Université Grenoble Alpes, LaRAC, Grenoble, France. Post-box: Université Grenoble Alpes, 1251 Avenue Centrale, 38400, Saint-Martin-d’Hères, bâtiment Michel Dubois, Aile C. Email: laurent.brun@univ-grenoble-alpes.fr
Current Themes of Research:
Laurent Brun is PhD in Educational Sciences at Grenoble Alpes University (France). His research focuses on causal attribution and their cognitive and behavioral consequences in educational settings.
Most Relevant Publications in the field of Psychology of Education:
Brun, L., Dompnier, B., & Pansu, P. (2019). Une échelle de mesure des attributions causales pour enfants : EMAC-E. L’Année psychologique, 119(4), 449-471. 10.3917/anpsy1.194.0449
Benoît Dompnier. Quartier UNIL-Mouline, Bâtiment Géopolis, Bureau: 5528, CH-1015, Lausanne, Switzerland. Email: Benoit.Dompnier@unil.ch
Current Themes of Research:
Benoît Dompnier is a Senior lecturer at University of Lausanne. His academic work concerns social psychology and educational psychology. His recent work focused on social judgment, self-presentation strategies and motivation in educational contexts.
Most Relevant Publications in the field of Psychology of Education:
Świątkowski, W., & Dompnier, B. (2020). A regulatory focus perspective on performance goals’ effects on achievement: A small-scale meta-analytical approach. Learning and Individual Differences, 78.
Carrier, A., Dompnier, B., & Yzerbyt, V. (2019). Of nice and mean: The personal relevance of others’ competence drives warmth perceptions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45, 1549-1562.
Darnon, C., Wierderkehr, V., Dompnier, B., & Martinot, D. (2018). “Where there is a will, there is a way”: Belief in school meritocracy and the social-class achievement gap. British Journal of Social Psychology, 57, 250-262.
Jury, M., Darnon, C., Dompnier, B., & Butera, F. (2017). The social utility of performance-approach goals in a selective educational environment. Social Psychology of Education, 20, 215-235.
Verniers, C., Martinot, D., & Dompnier, B. (2016). The feminization of school hypothesis called into question among junior and high school students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 369-381.
Dompnier, B., Darnon, C., Meier, E., Brandner, C., Smeding, A., & Butera, F. (2015). Improving low achievers’ academic performance at university by changing the social value of mastery goals. American Educational Research Journal, 52, 720-749.
Dompnier, B., Darnon, C., & Butera, F. (2013). When performance-approach goals predict academic success and when they do not: A social value approach. British Journal of Social Psychology, 52, 587-596.
Dompnier, B., Darnon, C., & Butera, F. (2009). Faking the desire to learn: A clarification of the link between mastery goals and academic achievement. Psychological Science, 20, 939-943.
Pascal Pansu. Université Grenoble Alpes, LaRAC, Grenoble, France. Post-box: Université Grenoble Alpes, 1251 Avenue Centrale, 38400 Saint-Martin-d’Hères, bâtiment Michel Dubois, Aile C. Email: pascal.pansu@univ-grenoble-alpes.fr
Current Themes of Research:
Pascal Pansu, PhD in social psychology, is full Professor at Grenoble Alpes University (France). His research mainly focuses on social beliefs and social judgment and their effect on self-evaluation and cognitive performances. He investigates the dynamics and processes involved in learning and achievement in educational settings, as for example, how teacher judgment and evaluative indices present in the classroom regulate students’ self-perceptions, learning, and performance.
Most Relevant Publications in the field of Psychology of Education:
Sanrey, C., Bressoux, P., Lima, L. & Pansu, P. (accepted). The halo effect in teachers’ judgments: Does certainty raise the bias? British Journal of Educational Psychology.
Boissicat, N., Pansu, P., & Bouffard, T. (2020). Does classroom social comparison bias students’ evaluation of their own competence? Social Psychology of Education, 1-24. DOI: 10.1007/s11218-020-09582
Hascoët, M., Pansu, P., Bouffard, T., & Leroy, N. (2018). The harmful aspect of teacher conditional support on students’ self-perception of school competence. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 33(4), 615-628. DOI: 10.1007/s10212-017-0350-0
Pansu, P, Régner, I, Max, S., Cole, P., Nezlek, J. B, & Huguet, P. (2016). A burden for the boys: Evidence of stereotype threat in boys’ reading performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 65, 26–30. DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2016.02.008
Bressoux, P., & Pansu, P. (2016). Pupils’ self-perceptions: The role of teachers’ judgment controlling for big-fish-little-pond effect. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 31(3), 341-357. DOI: 10.1007/s10212-015-0264
Bédard, K., Bouffard, T., & Pansu, P. (2014). The risks for adolescents of negatively biased self-evaluations of social competence: The mediating role of social support. Journal of adolescence, 37(6), 787-798. DOI: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2014.05.004
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
ESM 1
(DOCX 47 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brun, L., Dompnier, B. & Pansu, P. A latent profile analysis of teachers’ causal attribution for academic success or failure. Eur J Psychol Educ 37, 185–206 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-021-00551-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-021-00551-3