Abstract
The Prescription Drug User Fee Act of 1992 (PDUFA) is credited with the dramatic reduction in new drug approval times seen since 1993. Despite the faster approval times, however, the total time required for new drugs to reach the marketplace had not changed appreciably. With passage of the FDA Modernization Act of 1997 (FDAMA), the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) expanded its focus from shortening the regulatory review phase to helping drug developers reduce lengthy clinical development times and increase the speed to market for new products. Our analyses document a sharp downward trend in approval times during the 1990s—average approval time for new drugs fell 58%, from 31.3 months in the period 1990 to 1991 to 13.2 months in the period 1988 to 1999. Moreover, the percentage of new drugs approved in less than six months increased from 4% in 1992 to 28% in 1999. The data also show that, while average clinical development times increased by 14% from the period 1990 to 1991 to the period 1994 to 1995, there was a 37% decrease from the 1994 to 1995 period to the 1998 to 1999 period. The direction of change in average clinical development time from the first half of the 1990s to the second half varied by therapeutic class and by clinical development phase.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.References
Prescription Drug User Fee Act of 1992. Public Law 102-571 (1992) pt 29;21 USC 379;106 Stat 4491.
Kaitin KI. The Prescription Drug User Fee Act of 1992 and the new drug development process. Am J Therapeutics. 1997 May;4(5/6):167–172.
Kaitin KI, Healy EM. The new drug approvals of 1996, 1997, and 1998: drug development trends in the user fee era. Drug InfJ. 2000;34(1):1–14.
DiMasi JA, Seibring MA, Lasagna, L. New drug development in the United States, 1963 to 1992. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1994 Jun;55(6):609–622.
Food and Drug Administration Modernization Act of 1997. Public Law 105-115 (1997 Nov 21); 21 USC 355a; 111 Stat 2296.
DiMasi JA, Manocchia M. Initiatives to speed new drug development and regulatory review: the impact of FDA-sponsor conferences. Drug Inf J. 1997; 31(3):771–788.
Seeking FDA Advice to Speed New Drug Development: The Role of FDA/Sponsor Meetings, a Symposium Organized by the Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development, January 27, 1999, Philadelphia, PA. Executive Summary. Boston, MA: Tufts CSDD: 1999.
Effective data use drives portfolio management and global strategies. Boston, MA: Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development Impact Report. 2000 Jan:2(l).
DiMasi JA, Hansen RW, Grabowski HG, Lasagna L. Cost of innovation in the pharmaceutical industry. J Health Econ. 1991 Feb;10(2): 107–142.
Final annual performance report: Prescription Drug User Fee Act of 1992: fiscal year 1997 report to Congress. Rockville, MD: Food and Drug Administration; Dec 1997.
FY 1998 performance report to Congress for the Prescription Drug User Fee Act of 1992 as amended by the Food and Drug Administration Modernization Act of 1997. www.fda.gov/ope/pdufa/report98/default.htm#Outcomes
Pharma 2005: an industrial revolution in R&D. London: PriceWaterhouseCoopers; 1998.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kaitin, K.I., DiMasi, J.A. Measuring the Pace of New Drug Development in the User Fee ERA. Ther Innov Regul Sci 34, 673–680 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1177/009286150003400303
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/009286150003400303