Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

The Physiological Kinetics of Nitrogen and the Prevention of Decompression Sickness

  • Leading Article
  • Published:
Clinical Pharmacokinetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Decompression sickness (DCS) is a potentially crippling disease caused by intracorporeal bubble formation during or after decompression from a compressed gas underwater dive. Bubbles most commonly evolve from dissolved inert gas accumulated during the exposure to increased ambient pressure. Most diving is performed breathing air, and the inert gas of interest is nitrogen. Divers use algorithms based on nitrogen kinetic models to plan the duration and degree of exposure to increased ambient pressure and to control their ascent rate. However, even correct execution of dives planned using such algorithms often results in bubble formation and may result in DCS. This reflects the importance of idiosyncratic host factors that are difficult to model, and deficiencies in current nitrogen kinetic models.

Models describing the exchange of nitrogen between tissues and blood may be based on distributed capillary units or lumped compartments, either of which may be perfusion- or diffusion-limited. However, such simplistic models are usually poor predictors of experimental nitrogen kinetics at the organ or tissue level, probably because they fail to account for factors such as heterogeneity in both tissue composition and blood perfusion and non-capillary exchange mechanisms.

The modelling of safe decompression procedures is further complicated by incomplete understanding of the processes that determine bubble formation. Moreover, any formation of bubbles during decompression alters subsequent nitrogen kinetics. Although these factors mandate complex resolutions to account for the interaction between dissolved nitrogen kinetics and bubble formation and growth, most decompression schedules are based on relatively simple perfusion-limited lumped compartment models of blood : tissue nitrogen exchange. Not surprisingly, all models inevitably require empirical adjustment based on outcomes in the field.

Improvements in the predictive power of decompression calculations are being achieved using probabilistic bubble models, but divers will always be subject to the possibility of developing DCS despite adherence to prescribed limits.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Francis TJR, Gorman DR Pathogenesis of the decompression disorders. In: Bennett PB, Elliott, DH, editors. The physiology and medicine of diving. 4th ed. London: W.B. Saunders Company Ltd, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  2. Francis TJR, Smith DJ, editors. Describing decompression illness. Proceedings of the 42nd Undersea and Hyperbaric Medical Society Workshop; 1990 Oct 9–10; Alverstoke, Gosport, England. Bethesda (MD): Undersea and Hyperbaric Medical Society, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bert P. Barometric Pressure. Columbus: College Book Company, 1943

    Google Scholar 

  4. Boycott AE, Damant GCC, Haldane JS. The prevention of compressed-air illness. J Hyg Camb 1908; 8: 342–443

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Bove AA. Risk of decompression sickness with patent foramen ovale. Undersea Hyperb Med 1998; 25: 175–8

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Dear G, Uguccioni DM, Dovenbarger JA, et al. Estimated DCI incidence in a select group of recreational divers [abstract]. Undersea Hyperb Med 1999; 26 Suppl.: 19

    Google Scholar 

  7. Doolette DJ, Gorman DF. Longitudinal evaluation of decompression practice in an occupational diving group [abstract]. Undersea Hyperb Med 1999; 26 Suppl.: 27

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gardner M, Forbes C, Mitchell SJ. One hundred cases of decompression illness treated in New Zealand during 1995. South Pacific Underwater Med Soc J 1996; 26: 222–6

    Google Scholar 

  9. Richardson K, Mitchell SJ, Davis MF, et al. Decompression illness in New Zealand divers: the 1996 experience. South Pacific Underwater Med Soc J 1998; 28: 50–5

    Google Scholar 

  10. Vann RD, Uguccioni DM, editors. Report on decompression illness and diving fatalities. Durham (NC): Divers Alert Network, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  11. Nishi RY. Doppler and ultrasonic bubble detection. In: Bennett PB, Elliott DH, editors. The physiology and medicine of diving. 4th ed. London: W.B. Saunders Company Ltd, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  12. Doolette DJ. Uncertainties in predicting decompression illness. South Pacific Underwater Med Soc J 2000; 30: 31–6

    Google Scholar 

  13. Van der Aue OE, Brinton ES, Kellar RJ. Surface decompression: derivation and testing of decompression tables with safety limits for certain depths and exposures. Panama City (FL): U.S. Navy Experimental Diving Unit, 1945. Report no. 5-45

    Google Scholar 

  14. Van der Aue OE, Kellar RJ, Brinton ES. The effect of exercise during decompression from increased barometric pressures on the incidence of decompression sickness in man. Panama City (FL): U.S. Navy Experimental Diving Unit, 1949. Report No. 8-49

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jauchem JR, Waligora JM, Conkin J, et al. Blood biochemical factors in humans resistant and susceptible to formation of venous gas emboli during decompression. Eur J Appl Physiol 1986; 55: 68–73

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Masurel G, Guillem R, Cavenal P. Detection ultrasonore par effet Doppler de bulles circulantes chez l’homme lors de 98 plongees a l’air. Rev Med Subaquatique et Hyperbare 1976; 15: 199–201

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mekjavic IB, Kakitsuba N. Effect of peripheral temperature on the formation of venous gas bubbles. Undersea Biomed Res 1989; 16: 391–401

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Yamami N, Mano Y, Shibayama M, et al. Driving to altitude after diving and decompression sickness [abstract]. Undersea Hyperb Med 2000; 27 Suppl.: 51

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hills BA. Decompression sickness: the biophysical basis of prevention and treatment. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 1977

    Google Scholar 

  20. Dunford RG, Vann RD, Gerth WA, et al. The incidence of venous gas emboli in recreational diving [abstract]. Undersea Hyperb Med 2000; 27 Suppl.: 65

    Google Scholar 

  21. Thorsen T, Dalen H, Bjerkvig R, et al. Transmission and scanning electron microscopy of N2 microbubble activated human platelets in vitro. Undersea Biomed Res 1987; 14: 45–58

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hallenbeck JM, Anderson JC. Pathogenesis of the decompression disorders. In: Bennett PB, Elliott, DH, editors. The physiology of medicine and diving. 3rd ed. San Pedro (CA): Best Publications, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  23. Helps SC, Gorman DF. Air embolism of the brain in rabbits pre-treated with mechlorethamine. Stroke 1991; 22: 351–4

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Philp RB, Inwood MJ, Warren BC. Interactions between gas bubbles and components of the blood: implications in decompression sickness. Aerospace Med 1972; 43: 946–53

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Philp RB, Ackles KN, Inwood MJ, et al. Changes in the hemostatic system and in blood and urine chemistry of human subjects following decompression from a hyperbaric environment. Aerospace Med 1972; 43: 498–505

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Butler BD, Hills BA. The lung as a filter for microbubbles. J Appl Physiol 1979; 47: 537–43

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Butler BD, Hills BA. Transpulmonary passage of venous air emboli. J Appl Physiol 1985; 49: 543–7

    Google Scholar 

  28. Elliott DH, Moon RE. Manifestations of the decompression disorders. In: Bennett PB, Elliott DH, editors. The physiology and medicine of diving. 4th ed. London: WB. Saunders Company Ltd, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  29. Moon RE, Camporesi EM, Kisslo JA. Patent foramen ovale and decompression sickness in divers. Lancet 1989; I: 513–4

    Google Scholar 

  30. Helps SC, Myer-Witting MW, Reilly PL, et al. Increasing doses of intracarotid air and cerebral blood flow in rabbits. Stroke 1990; 21: 1340–5

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Hills BA, James PB. Microbubble damage to the blood-brain barrier: relevance to decompression sickness. Undersea Biomed Res 1991; 18: 111–6

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Chryssanthou C, Springer M, Lipschitz S. Blood-brain and bloodlung barrier alteration by dysbaric exposure. Undersea Biomed Res 1977; 4: 117–29

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Lin YC, Kakitsuba N, Watanabe DK, et al. Influence of blood flow on cutaneous permeability to inert gas. J Appl Physiol 1984; 57: 1167–72

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Hill L, Greenwood M. The influence of increased barometric pressure on man: II. Proc R Soc Lond B 1907; 79: 21–7

    Google Scholar 

  35. Mapleson WW Quantitative prediction of anesthetic concentrations. In: Papper EM, Kitz, RJ, editors. Uptake and distribution of anesthetic agents. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1962

    Google Scholar 

  36. Eger EI. A mathematical model of uptake and distribution. In: Papper EM, Kitz RJ, editors. Uptake and distribution of anesthetic agents. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1962

    Google Scholar 

  37. Lango T, Morland T, Brubakk AO. Diffusion coefficients and solubility coefficients for gases in biological fluids: a review. Undersea Hyperb Med 1996; 23: 247–72

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Nunn JF. Applied respiratory physiology. 3rd ed. London: Buttersworths, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  39. Krogh A. The number and distribution of capillaries in muscles with calculations of the oxygen pressure head necessary for supplying the tissue. J Physiol (Lond) 1919; 52: 409–15

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Perl W, Chinard FP. A convection-diffusion model of indicator transport through an organ. Circ Res 1968; 22: 273–98

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Bassingthwaighte JB, Goresky CA. Modeling in the analysis of solute and water exchange in the microvasculature. In: Berne RM, Sperelakis N, editors. Section 2: the cardiovascular system. Bethesda (MD): American Physiological Society, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  42. Hennessy TR. The interaction of diffusion and perfusion in homogeneous tissue. Bull Math Biol 1974; 36: 505–26

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Altaian PL, Dittmer DS. Respiration and circulation. Bethesda (MD): Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, 1971

    Google Scholar 

  44. Hudlicka O, Zweifach BW, Tyler KR. Capillary recruitment and flow velocity in skeletal muscle after contractions. Microvasc Res 1982;23:201–13

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Tepper RS, Lightfoot EN, Baz A, et al. Inert gas transport in the microcirculation: risk of isobaric supersaturation. J Appl Physiol 1979; 46: 1157–63

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Hempleman HV. British decompression theory and practice. In: Bennett PB, Elliott DH, editors. The physiology and medicine of diving and compressed air work. 1st ed. London: Balliere Tindall and Cassell, 1969

    Google Scholar 

  47. Hennessy TR. The equivalent bulk-diffusion model of the pneumatic decompression computer. Med Biol Eng 1973; 11: 135–7

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Nishi RY, Lauckner GR. Development of the DCIEM 1983 decompression model for compressed air diving. Downsview (ON): Defence and Civil Institute of Environmental Medicine, 1984. Report no. 84-R-88

    Google Scholar 

  49. Morales MF, Smith RE. On the theory of blood-tissue exchange of inert gases: VI. Validity of approximate uptake expressions. Bull Math Biophysics 1948; 10: 191–200

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Kety SS. The theory and applications of the exchange of inert gas at the lungs and tissues. Pharmacol Rev 1951; 3: 1–40

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Scheid P, Piiper J. Inert gas wash-out from tissue: model analysis. Respir Physiol 1986; 63: 1–18

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Doolette DJ, Upton RN, Grant C. Diffusion limited, but not perfusion limited, compartmental models describe cerebral nitrous oxide kinetics at both high and low cerebral blood flows. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm 1998; 26: 649–72

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Scheid P, Meyer M, Piiper J. Elements for modeling inert gas washout from heterogeneous tissues. Adv Exp Med Biol 1984; 180: 65–72

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Homer LD, Weathersby PK. How well mixed is inert gas in tissues? J Appl Physiol 1986; 60: 2079–88

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Homer LD, Weathersby PK, Survanshi S. How countercurrent blood flow and uneven perfusion affect motion of inert gas. J Appl Physiol 1990; 69: 162–70

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Himm JF, Homer LD, Novotny JA. Effect of lipid on inert gas kinetics. J Appl Physiol 1994; 77: 303–12

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Novotny JA, Mayers DL, Parsons Y-FJ, et al. Xenon kinetics in muscle are not explained by a model of parallel perfusionlimited compartments. J Appl Physiol 1990; 68: 876–90

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Perl W, Rackow H, Salanitre E, et al. Intertissue diffusion effect for inert fat-soluble gases. J Appl Physiol 1965; 20: 621–7

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Kjellmer I, Lindberg I, Prerovsky I, et al. The relation between blood flow in an isolated muscle measured with the Xe133 clearance and a direct recording technique. Acta Physiol Scand 1967; 69: 69–78

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Sejrsen P, Tonnsen KH. Inert gas diffusion method for measurement of blood flow using saturation techniques. Circ Res 1968; 22:679–93

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Ackles KN, Holness DE, Scott CA. Measurement of uptake and elimination of nitrogen in tissue, in vivo. In: Lambertsen CJ, editor. Underwaterphysiology V. Proceedings of the 5th Symposium on Underwater Physiology. Bethesda (MD): FASEB, 1976: 349–54

    Google Scholar 

  62. Ohta Y, Farhi LE. Cerebral gas exchange: perfusion and diffusion limitations. J Appl Physiol 1979; 46: 1164–8

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Kety SS, Harmell MH, Broomell HT, et al. The solubility of nitrous oxide in blood and brain. J Biol Chem 1948; 173: 487–96

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Lassen NA, Klee A. Cerebral blood flow determination by saturation and desaturation with krypton. Circ Res 1965; 16: 26–32

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Brodersen P, Sejrsen P, Lassen NA. Diffusion bypass of xenon in brain circulation. Circ Res 1973; 32: 363–9

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Sejrsen P. Shunting by diffusion of gas in skeletal muscle and brain. In: Johansen K, Burggren W, editors. Cardiovascular shunts: phylogenic, ontogenic, and clinical aspects. Proceedings of the Alfred Benzon Symposium 21; 1984 Jun 17–21; Copenhagen. Copenhagen: Munksgaard, 1985: 452–62

    Google Scholar 

  67. Campbell JA, Hill L. Studies in the saturation of the tissues with gaseous nitrogen: I. Rate of saturation of goat’s bone marrow in vivo with nitrogen during exposure to increased atmospheric pressure. Q J Exp Biol 1933; 23: 197–210

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Behnke AR, Thomson RM, Shaw LA. The rate of elimination of dissolved nitrogen in man in relation to the fat and water content of the body. Am J Physiol 1935; 114: 137–46

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Vorosmarti Jr J, Barnard EE, Williams J, et al. Nitrogen elimination during steady-state hyperbaric exposures. Undersea Biomed Res 1978; 5: 243–52

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Lundin G. Nitrogen elimination during oxygen breathing. Acta Physiol Scand 1953; 30 Suppl. 111: 130–43

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Groom AC, Morin R, Farhi LE. Determination of dis solved N2 in blood and investigation of N2 washout from the body. J Appl Physiol 1967; 23: 706–12

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Weathersby PK, Mendenhall KG, Barnard EEP, et al. Distribution of xenon gas exchange rates in dogs. J Appl Physiol 1981; 50: 1325–36

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Thalmann ED, Parker EC, Survanshi SS, et al. Improved probabilistic decompression model risk predictions using linearexponential kinetics. Undersea Hyperb Med 1997; 24: 255–74

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Eckenhoff RG, Olstad CS, Carrod G. Human dose-response relationship for decompression and endogenous bubble formation. J Appl Physiol 1990; 69: 914–8

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Van Liew HD, Hlastala MP. Influence of bubble size and blood perfusion on absorption of gas bubbles in tissue. Respir Physiol 1969; 7: 111–21

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Van Liew HD. Simulation of the dynamics of decompression sickness bubbles and the generation of new bubbles. Undersea Biomed Res 1991; 18: 333–45

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Srinivasan RS, Gerth WA, Powell MR. Mathematical models of diffusion-limited gas bubble dynamics in tissue. J Appl Physiol 1999; 86: 732–41

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Burkard ME, Van Liew HD. Simulation of exchanges of multiple gases in bubbles in the body. Respir Physiol 1994; 95: 131–45

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Hyldegaard O, Madsen J. Influence of heliox, oxygen, and N2O-O2 breathing on N2 bubbles in adipose tissue. Undersea Biomed Res 1989; 16: 185–93

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Hyldegaard O, Madsen J. Effect of air, heliox, and oxygen breaming on air bubbles in aqueous tissues in the rat. Undersea Hyperb Med 1994; 21: 413–24

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Gerth WA, Vann RD. Probabilistic gas and bubble dynamics models of decompression sickness occurrence in air and N2-O2 diving. Undersea Hyperb Med 1997; 24: 275–92

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Willmon TL, Behnke AR. Nitrogen elimination and oxygen absorbtion at high barometric pressure. Am J Physiol 1940; 131:633–8

    Google Scholar 

  83. Hills BA. Effect of decompression per se on nitrogen elimination. J Appl Physiol 1978; 45: 916–21

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Kindwall EP, Baz A, Lightfoot EN, et al. Nitrogen elimination in man during decompression. Undersea Biomed Res 1975; 2: 285–97

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. D’Aoust BG, Smith KH, Swanson HT. Decompression-induced decrease in nitrogen elimination rate in awake dogs. J Appl Physiol 1976;41:348–55

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. D’Aoust BG, Swanson HT, White R, et al. Central venous bubbles and mixed venous nitrogen in goats following decompression. J Appl Physiol 1981; 51: 1238–44

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Anderson D, Nagasawa G, Norfleet W, et al. O2 pressures between 0.12 and 2.5 atm abs, circulatory function, and N2 elimination. Undersea Biomed Res 1991; 18: 279–92

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Hennessy TR, Hempleman HV An examination of the critical released gas volume concept of decompression sickness. Proc R Soc Lond B 1977; 197: 229–313

    Google Scholar 

  89. Workman RD. American decompression theory and practice. In: Bennett PB, Elliott DH, editors. The physiology and medicine of diving and compressed air work. 1st ed. London: Balliere Tindall and Cassell, 1969

    Google Scholar 

  90. U.S. Navy Diving Manual (Air Diving). Revision 1 st ed. Washington, DC: Naval Sea Systems Command, 1985

  91. Schreiner HR, Kelley PL. A pragmatic view of decompression. In: Lambertsen CJ, editor. Underwater physiology IV Proceedings of the 4th Symposium on Underwater Physiology. New York: Academic Press, 1971: 205–19

    Google Scholar 

  92. Bühlmann AA. Die Berechnung der risikoarmen Dekompression. Schweiz Med Wschr 1988; 118: 185–97

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Yount DE, Hoffman DC. On the use of a bubble formation model to calculate diving tables. Aviat Space Environ Med 1986; 57: 149–56

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Wienke BR. Numerical phase algorithm for decompression computers and application. Comput Biol Med 1992; 22: 389–406

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Weathersby PK, Homer LD, Flynn ET. On the likelihood of decompression sickness. J Appl Physiol 1984; 57: 815–25

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Tikuisis P, Gault KA, Nishi RY Prediction of decompression illness using bubble models. Undersea Hyperb Med 1994; 21: 129–43

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Gault KA, Tikuisis P, Nishi RY. Calibration of a bubble evolution model to observed bubble incidence in divers. Undersea Hyperb Med 1995; 22: 249–62

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, SA 5005, Australia

    David J. Doolette

  2. Wesley Centre for Hyperbaric Medicine, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

    Simon J. Mitchell

Authors
  1. David J. Doolette
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Simon J. Mitchell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David J. Doolette.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Doolette, D.J., Mitchell, S.J. The Physiological Kinetics of Nitrogen and the Prevention of Decompression Sickness. Clin Pharmacokinet 40, 1–14 (2001). https://doi.org/10.2165/00003088-200140010-00001

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00003088-200140010-00001