Marketing Farm Safety: Using Principles of Influence to Increase PTO Shielding
- PMID: 30346257
- PMCID: PMC6353692
- DOI: 10.1080/1059924X.2018.1539421
Marketing Farm Safety: Using Principles of Influence to Increase PTO Shielding
Abstract
Objectives: Despite much work to reduce the frequency and severity of agricultural injuries, these events still occur. Power take-off entanglements are one example of agricultural events that can lead to death or permanent disability. This manuscript considers the use of marketing techniques to reduce agricultural injuries. Specifically, the "principles of influence" (liking, social proof, authority, consistency, reciprocity, and scarcity) are explored as methods of promoting power take-off shielding among New York farmers.
Methods: Focus group discussions were held with farmers and agricultural service providers in seven agricultural counties in New York. Participants were provided with background information about power take-off injuries, as well as information on one principle of influence. Facilitators then guided the groups through a brainstorming discussion to formulate intervention strategies.
Results: Thirty-nine individuals participated in the discussions. Participants provided feedback on individuals and organizations that could serve as influencers, potential incentives for participants, and beliefs about what would not work in their community.
Conclusion: Overall, participants were enthusiastic about using principles of influence to promote power take-off shielding. These methods appear to be promising for improving safety on farms, and have the potential to save both time and money compared to other intervention strategies.
Keywords: Agricultural safety; power take-off; marketing; principles of influence.
Figures
Similar articles
-
A Comparison of Interventional Approaches for Increasing Power Take-off Shielding on New York Farms.J Agromedicine. 2017;22(3):251-258. doi: 10.1080/1059924X.2017.1318726. J Agromedicine. 2017. PMID: 28402231
-
Concept identification for a power take-off shielding campaign.J Agromedicine. 2015;20(1):55-63. doi: 10.1080/1059924X.2014.976731. J Agromedicine. 2015. PMID: 25635743
-
A qualitative analysis of power take-off driveline shields: barriers and motivators to shield use for New York State farmers.J Agric Saf Health. 2014 Jan;20(1):51-61. doi: 10.13031/jash.20.10425. J Agric Saf Health. 2014. PMID: 24804464
-
Relative safety of traditional agricultural tractor power take-off (PTO) drivelines compared to fluid power--a review.J Agric Saf Health. 2003 Aug;9(3):241-50. J Agric Saf Health. 2003. PMID: 12970954 Review.
-
Interventions to reduce injuries among older workers in agriculture: A review of evaluated intervention projects.Work. 2016 Oct 17;55(2):471-480. doi: 10.3233/WOR-162407. Work. 2016. PMID: 27689590 Review.
References
-
- Feury KJ. Injury prevention. Where are the resources? Orthopedic nursing. 2003; 22(2): 124–130. [PubMed: ] - PubMed
-
- Bureau of Labor Statistics. Census of fatal occupational injuries charts, 1992–2016 (final data). United States Department of Labor; Washington, D.C.: 2016. Available from https://www.bls.gov/iif/oshcfoi1.htm.
-
- Donham K Prevention of illness and injury in agriculture. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2016.
-
- Cialdini R Influence: The psychology of persuassion. New York, NY: Collins Bussiness Essentials; 2007.
-
- Marteau T Judging nudging: Can nudging improve population health? British Medical Journal. 2011; 342(7791): 263–265. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical