Jump to content

Template talk:Did you know/Approved

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Did you know?
Introduction and rules
IntroductionWP:DYK
General discussionWT:DYK
GuidelinesWP:DYKCRIT
Reviewer instructionsWP:DYKRI
Nominations
Nominate an articleWP:DYKCNN
Awaiting approvalWP:DYKN
ApprovedWP:DYKNA
April 1 hooksWP:DYKAPRIL
Holding areaWP:SOHA
Preparation
Preps and queuesTM:DYK/Q
Prepper instructionsWP:DYKPBI
Admin instructionsWP:DYKAI
Main Page errorsWP:ERRORS
History
StatisticsWP:DYKSTATS
Archived setsWP:DYKA
Just for fun
Monthly wrapsWP:DYKW
AwardsWP:DYKAWARDS
UserboxesWP:DYKUBX
Hall of FameWP:DYK/HoF
List of users ...
... by nominationsWP:DYKNC
... by promotionsWP:DYKPC
Administrative
Scripts and botsWP:DYKSB
On the Main Page
Main Page errorsWP:ERRORS
To ping the DYK admins{{DYK admins}}


This page holds approved nominations that are waiting to appear in the "Did you know" section on the Main Page. Following DYK approval, nominations are processed and moved into a Prep area, and from there, prep sets are promoted to a queue, and then to the main page.

To create a new nomination or to see those that are yet to be approved, see Template talk:Did you know. For the discussion page see WT:DYK. Click on the link to go directly to the Special occasion holding area.

  If some of the nominations are not showing up properly at the bottom of the page, these alternative pages can be used to view a subset of the most recent nominations.
Count of DYK Hooks
Section # of Hooks # Verified
March 15 1
March 16 1
March 21 1 1
March 22 1
March 23 1
March 24 3 2
March 25 1
March 26 1 1
March 27 1
March 28 1
March 29 2
March 30 5
April 2 3
April 3 1
April 4 1
April 6 3
April 7 1 1
April 8 3
April 9 6
April 11 2
April 12 2
April 13 5 2
April 14 2
April 15 3 2
April 16 4 3
April 17 6 3
April 18 11 5
April 19 6 3
April 20 8 3
April 21 16 9
April 22 9 8
April 23 15 7
April 24 14 7
April 25 11 6
April 26 10 5
April 27 13 9
April 28 25 15
April 29 6 4
April 30 15 11
May 1 11 8
May 2 11 6
May 3 9 8
May 4 6
May 5 6
May 6 4
May 7 8
May 8 4
May 9 5
May 10 7
May 11 3
May 12
May 13
May 14
Total 294 129
Last updated 00:04, 14 May 2025 UTC
Current time is 00:14, 14 May 2025 UTC [refresh]

Instructions for nominators

[edit]

This page is for those nominations that have already been approved and are waiting to be promoted. If yours has been approved but has not yet been run on the main page, it should either be on this page or will soon be moved here, or already promoted to a Prep area or Queue ahead of an appearance on the main page.

If you wish to create a new nomination, please go to the Template talk:Did you know page; there are instructions there in a section similar to this one on how to nominate an article for DYK.

Frequently asked questions

[edit]

Backlogged?

[edit]

This page is often backlogged. As long as your submission is still on the page, it will stay there until someone promotes it to a preparation area. To alleviate this problem, if the approved page has more than 120 approved hooks, then sets will change twice per day (every 12 hours) instead of once per day (every 24 hours). When the backlog falls below 60 approved nominations set frequency returns to once a day.

Where is my hook?

[edit]

If you can't find the nomination you submitted to the nominations page, and it also isn't on this page, in most cases it means your article has been approved and is either in one of the prep areas, has been promoted from prep to a queue, or is on the main page.

If the nominated hook is in none of those places, then the nomination has probably been rejected. Such a rejection usually only occurs if it was at least a couple of weeks old and had unresolved issues for which any discussion had gone stale. If you think your nomination was unfairly rejected, you can query this on the DYK discussion page, but as a general rule such nominations will only be restored in exceptional circumstances.

Instructions for other editors

[edit]

How to promote an accepted hook

[edit]
  • See Wikipedia:Did you know/Preparation areas for full instructions.
  • In one window, open the DYK nomination subpage of the hook you would like to promote.
  • In another window, open the prep set you intend to add the hook to.
  • In the prep set...
    • Paste the hook into the hook area (be sure to not paste in that that)
    • Paste the credit information ({{DYKmake}} and/or {{DYKnom}}) into the credits area.
    • Add an edit summary, e.g., "Promoted [[Jane Fonda]]", preview, and save
  • Back on DYK nomination page...
    • change {{DYKsubpage to {{subst:DYKsubpage
    • change |passed= to |passed=yes
    • Add an edit summary, e.g., "Promoted original hook to Prep 3", preview, and save

How to remove a hook from the prep areas or queue

[edit]
  • Edit the prep area or queue where the hook is and remove the hook and the credits associated with it.
  • Go to the hook's nomination subpage (there should have been a link to it in the credits section).
    • View the edit history for that page
    • Go back to the last version before the edit where the hook was promoted, and revert to that version to make the nomination active again.
    • Add a new icon on the nomination subpage to cancel the previous tick and leave a comment after it explaining that the hook was removed from the prep area or queue, and why, so that later reviewers are aware of this issue.
  • Add a transclusion of the template back to the nominations page so that reviewers can see it. It goes under the date that it was first created/expanded/listed as a GA. You may need to add back the day header for that date if it had been removed from the nominations page.
  • If you removed the hook from a queue, it is best to either replace it with another hook from one of the prep areas, or to leave a message at WT:DYK asking someone else to do so.

Nominations

[edit]

Special occasion holding area

[edit]
Do not nominate articles in this section—nominate all articles in the nominations section on the regular nominations page, under the date on which the article was created or moved to mainspace, or the expansion began, or it was listed as a Good Article; be sure to indicate in the nomination any request for a specially timed appearance on the main page.
Note: Articles intended to be held for special occasion dates should be nominated within seven days of creation, start of expansion, or promotion to Good Article status. The nomination should be made between at least one week prior to the occasion date, to allow time for reviews and promotions through the prep and queue sets, but not more than six weeks in advance. The proposed occasion must be deemed sufficiently special by reviewers. The timeline limitations, including the six week maximum, may be waived by consensus, if a request is made at WT:DYK, but requests are not always successful. Discussion clarifying the hold criteria can be found here: [1]; discussion setting the six week limit can be found here: [2].
April Fools' Day hooks are exempted from the timeline limit; see Wikipedia:April Fool's Main Page/Did You Know.
Note for promoters: please be sure to add an "invisible" comment after a hook when you've placed it in prep, noting that it's a special occasion hook and including the date it is supposed to run. This should keep the hook from being moved after promotion, as sometimes happens to hooks when a queue needs a slot filled or a prep set needs to be made more balanced by swapping hooks between preps.

June 1

[edit]

June

  • ... that today is not June?
Improved to Good Article status by LunaEatsTuna (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 12 past nominations.

❧ LunaEatsTuna (talk), proudly editing since 2018 (and just editing since 2017) – posted at 01:28, 28 February 2025 (UTC).[reply]

Reopened per WT:DYK.--Launchballer 17:28, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • It took me a little while to understand what ALT1 was trying to say. Maybe we could specifically mention "day of the week" instead of just "day" to be more easily understandable: ALT2: ... that every year, no other month ever starts on the same day of the week as June? Mz7 (talk) 05:59, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

June 19

[edit]

Rosa Parks

Rosa Parks in 1955
Rosa Parks in 1955
  • ... that Rosa Parks did not refuse to surrender her seat because she was physically tired, but because she was "tired of giving in"?
  • Source: "People always say that I didn't give up my seat because I was tired, but that isn't true. I was not tired physically, or no more tired than I usually was at the end of a working day. I was not old, although some people have an image of me as being old then. I was forty-two. No, the only tired I was, was tired of giving in." (Parks & Haskins, p. 116)
  • ALT1: ... that Rosa Parks did not refuse to surrender her seat on a Montgomery bus because she was physically tired, but because she was "tired of giving in"? Source: "People always say that I didn't give up my seat because I was tired, but that isn't true. I was not tired physically, or no more tired than I usually was at the end of a working day. I was not old, although some people have an image of me as being old then. I was forty-two. No, the only tired I was, was tired of giving in." (Parks & Haskins, p. 116)
  • Reviewed:
  • Comment: Former reads a little bit better to me, latter gives a bit more context. Not sure if it's necessary, given Parks's fame, but maybe.
Improved to Good Article status by Spookyaki (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

Spookyaki (talk) 18:30, 6 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]

Policy compliance:

Hook eligibility:

  • Cited: Yes
  • Interesting: Yes
  • Other problems: Yes
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: Done.

Overall: @Spookyaki: Thank you for upgrading such an important article to GA status. It was upgraded to GA status recently and a quick scan of the article shows no problems stopping it from becoming a DYK. Both of the hooks are fine. Jon698 (talk) 08:57, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Spookyaki and Jon698: Would you like to submit an image with this nomination?--Launchballer 19:16, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The image in the infobox can be used since it is public domain. Jon698 (talk) 19:32, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I added it. This would make an excellent Juneteenth hook, but I'll let a promoter make that decision since that's well over six weeks away.--Launchballer 19:36, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I think if I were to select an image, it would be that one or this one, since the statue depicts Parks sitting on the bus. Neither would be a bad choice, I think. Spookyaki (talk) 19:41, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, and sorry, as for Juneteenth, that sounds fine. At some point, I'm planning to submit this article for FA, so I'm not entirely sure how the timelines will line up, however. Spookyaki (talk) 19:44, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It has been brought up in the Peer Review for this page that the PD status for the selected image may by questionable, so may be better do use a different image. Spookyaki (talk) 13:03, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I suggest organising a crop of File:President Bill Clinton presents Rosa Parks with the Presidential Medal of Freedom in the Oval Office.jpg; the rest are side profiles.--Launchballer 13:10, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Seems reasonable to me! Spookyaki (talk) 13:13, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Assuming we've got the licensing resolved, I like File:Rosaparks.jpg the best, but I'd take a closer crop. I know that's King in the background, but for the purpose of a Parks biography, that's just a distraction. The photos of sculptures probably won't pass copyright review. And the one with Clinton is a strange perspective, not to mention that a contemporary photo would be much better. I agree with running this on Juneteenth. RoySmith (talk) 22:45, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It is not resolved, unfortunately. It seems like the photo is not PD and maybe not even fair use (though I've tried my best to argue for the latter). I guess maybe the next next next best photo that I am pretty sure is PD would be this one. Spookyaki (talk) 01:08, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Approved nominations

[edit]

Articles created/expanded on March 21

[edit]

Andrée Dumon

Andrée Dumon
Andrée Dumon
5x expanded by Atlanquetzl (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 289 past nominations.

Launchballer 15:52, 28 March 2025 (UTC).[reply]

Policy compliance:

Hook eligibility:

  • Cited: Yes
  • Interesting: Yes
  • Other problems: Yes
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: Done.

Overall: @Atlanquetzl: I made a few edits to the page to improve the lead and parts of her life. The hook is very interesting, but I suggest that it be reworded to "... that Belgian Resistance member Andrée Dumon was recommended for the United States' Medal of Freedom for "assisting directly in the recuperation and repatriation of about 100 Allied airmen"?" Jon698 (talk) 00:29, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Atlanquetzl, Launchballer, and Jon698: are we sure about the free status of this image? It looks like a fairly old photo and the uploader claims it's their own work, which I'm inclined to doubt.~Darth StabroTalk • Contribs 02:09, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Genuinely no idea, I assumed it had been through VRT when it was uploaded. Images are not my stong point, and that's putting it pretty mildly.--Launchballer 02:31, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
See https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Andr%C3%A9e_Dumon.jpg RoySmith (talk) 22:30, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Annwfwn: The image is at XFD and so probably can't be used. I'm happy to wait until they reach a decision.--Launchballer 10:26, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on March 24

[edit]

Soumen Mitra

  • ... that whilst acting as a police superintendent under the West Bengal Police, Soumen Mitra developed a reputation for starting welfare and development projects in areas where he was posted?
Improved to Good Article status by Sohom Datta (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 5 past nominations.

7kk (talk) 00:17, 31 March 2025 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough

Policy compliance:

Hook eligibility:

  • Cited: No - ?
  • Interesting: Yes
QPQ: Done.

Overall: The article achieved GA status on 24 March, and nominated for DYK one week later. Length is adequate. Sourcing is good, but the infobox has a full birth date, whereas the citation in the prose in only for the year 1961. Please clarify. The article is neutral in tone, and no plagiarism was detected. The proposed hook is interesting, but could be said in fewer words. The corresponding prose in the article that supports the hook needs a citation directly at the end, as per WP:DYKHFC. No images are used in the article, and the QPQ requirement is complete. Overall, the article is well written and a welcome contribution to Wikipedia. Flibirigit (talk) 18:58, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed both. Sohom (talk) 20:15, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The birth date concern is resolved. The hook now has a cited, but I struggle to verify it. The source says:

Known for his knack to spruce up buildings where he is posted, some of his colleagues recalled how Mitra had been pivotal in the renovation of the traffic building in Lalbazar, setting up the Calcutta police traffic museum and re-decorating parts of Bhabani Bhavan during his stint at the state CID.

Someone who knows Mitra from his younger days shared with Metro how he had turned a boat seized with a large quantity of illicit liquor into a barb wire shelter for birds during his first posting as the SDPO Barrackpore.

Another officer, who has done multiple assignments with Mitra, said his speciality has been his “human touch for the force and his eye for their welfare”.

As the superintendent of police in Murshidabad, Mitra has started several developmental and welfare projects —some for the constabulary and some for the development of backward pockets known for notorious activities.

“He started the Chandradip Mela in Hariharpara (one of the police station areas in Murshidabad that was infamous of violence and ganglord killings) as an annual developmental project that changed the entire area,” said a senior officer in the force.

Nowhere in this source can I find the word "reputation", which is a subjective term. It appears he "was known" for development projects, but I cannot see where he was "known for" welfare projects. It is verified that he started several welfare projects, but I cannot see a reputation. One officer quoted as saying Mitra had an eye for welfare, but that does not mean he was "known for" it, rather it seems like one person's opinion. Please clarify. Best wishes. Flibirigit (talk) 21:15, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Reminders for this nomination posted today for the nominator and the original author. Flibirigit (talk) 02:02, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Should the hook be rewritten? The hook could be changed to read that Mitra was known for his welfare projects, the source says he was "Known for his knack to spruce up buildings where he is posted". 7kk (talk) 13:36, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, a new hook should be proposed. The corresponding prose in the article needs to be updated accordingly. Flibirigit (talk) 15:25, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Another two reminders have been given to the nominator. Flibirigit (talk) 14:02, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Flibirigit, how about
  • ALT1 ... that Soumen Mitra helped restore one of India's first mental asylum?
Referenced to [3] and [4]. Sohom (talk) 00:56, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
ALT1 is grammatically incorrect. Asylums should be plural in this case. The hook seems to say that the institution remained a mental asylum after it was restored. Rather, the building was restored and repurposed. A better wording is needed here. Also, the dubious mention of a "reputation" for starting development projects needs to be resolved. Flibirigit (talk) 12:12, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Flibirigit, I have reworded the "development and welfare" sentence to be a exact literal interpretation of the source. Regarding ALT 1, what are your thoughts on,
  • ALT2 ... that Soumen Mitra helped restore the Kolkata Police Training School building, which had previously housed one of India's first mental asylums?
Sohom (talk) 12:39, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Approving ALT2. It is the best option of the proposed hooks. It is verified, cited, and somewhat interesting. I have struck ALT0 and ALT1 as per my concerns listed above. The wording concern about "reputation" have been resolved. No other issues remaining. I am open to other hoosk if proposed. Flibirigit (talk) 18:42, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Downstate (play)

  • ... that Ted Cruz accused the play Downstate of celebrating pedophilia? Source: "After the Washington Post critic Peter Marks posted a link on Twitter to his favorable review, conservatives, including Senator Ted Cruz, attacked him. They claimed that the play and by extension the review were sympathetic to pedophiles." The New York Times
    • ALT1: ... that the theatre which premiered a play about sex offenders had to hire additional security for its run? Source: "So inflammatory are its themes that Steppenwolf, having received threats, had to hire additional security for the show’s run." The New York Times
    • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Nawala Al-Mutawalli
    • Comment: I think ALT0 is stronger, but including ALT1 in case others disagree. The expansion tag in the synopsis section is just since it's been a few months since I've seen it and I don't trust myself to remember the full plot, but it's "reasonably complete" for the DYK standard, and if you find it an issue we could reasonably just remove it.
5x expanded by Sdkb (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 45 past nominations.

Sdkbtalk 06:03, 24 March 2025 (UTC).[reply]

  • I'm pretty certain that WP:PLOTCITE only applies to published works such as films and there's no indication this has made it out of the theatre, so the Synopsis and Characters need sourcing.--Launchballer 12:58, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Launchballer, thanks for taking a look! My understanding of WP:PLOTCITE is that it applies to all published works of fiction, and I would consider this a published work in that the script is available for purchase (ISBN: 978-1-63852-403-8). I haven't found a plot summary published online, so I wouldn't have anything to cite beyond the play itself (which is what PLOTCITE says doesn't need to be cited), and looking to precedents like Wicked_(musical)#Synopsis (a GA) I'm not seeing plots cited there either. For the character descriptions, though, because describing their personalities is a form of inference, I can see more of a need for citations, and they're available in the reviews so I've added them. I hope that helps address your note; please let me know if you need anything else to complete the review! Cheers, Sdkbtalk 00:37, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't say I was doing a review, and wouldn't anyway while that tag was still deserved. (I have a firm policy of doing my QPQs oldest first.)--Launchballer 04:04, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
No worries (the use of the reviewer slash icon was what gave me the impression you were).
Per above, this is open for anyone who wants to take it up. Sdkbtalk 05:27, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'll review this one in the morning. (Did say I wouldn't while the tag's deserved, but the alternative's United States government group chat leak...)--Launchballer 02:15, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Long enough, new enough. Earwig is clean and the QPQ is valid. I took the tag off myself and can see no reason why this might deserve a dispute tag; this is {{lead too short}} borderline and could use an infobox, but these are not disqualifiers. As for the hooks, only ALT1 checks out as ALT0 requires knowledge of Cruz and therefore fails WP:DYKINT.--Launchballer 15:49, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the review, Launchballer! Regarding ALT0, Ted Cruz is such a popular figure that I'd say he's recognizable to almost all Americans and some portion of non-Americans. But if it'd help to pass WP:DYKINT, we could use introduce him as a U.S. Senator in ALT0a: that U.S. Senator Ted Cruz accused the play Downstate of celebrating pedophilia? That way, even for readers who don't know Cruz, the fact that an off-Broadway play attracted attention from a national politician should be of interest. Sdkbtalk 18:20, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've pulled this from the queue after discussions about the suitability of the hook at Errors. Schwede66 09:29, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is an article about a play. The hook should be about the play. By cherry-picking the one negative review, we've turned this into a hook about Ted Cruz, not about the play. RoySmith (talk) 13:10, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@RoySmith: Is there a reason why we can't just go with ALT1? That was the reviewer's original preference and also the hook that was originally promoted. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 14:38, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Pinging also @SL93:.--Launchballer 15:03, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
ALT1 looks good to me. RoySmith (talk) 15:07, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This should probably go back into prep/queue.--Launchballer 15:18, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'm fine with ALT1 running at this point. (I'm not fully persuaded by the problems others seem to have with ALT0 here and here, but I don't want to put up a fuss about that, and based on the feedback my own judgement that ALT0 was more interesting may have been wrong.) Sdkbtalk 00:55, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on March 26

[edit]

2015 Islamic State killing of Christian migrants in Libya

Created by Chomik1129 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

Chomik! (talk?) 01:54, 28 March 2025 (UTC).[reply]

Policy compliance:

Hook eligibility:

  • Cited: Yes
  • Interesting: Yes
  • Other problems: Yes
QPQ: Done.

Overall: @Chomik1129: As you have done less than 5 DYKs you do not need a QPQ and the page was created two days before its DYK nomination. A quick check of the sources shows that all of them are from reputable sources. The first hook isn't interesting, but ALT1 is and I would suggest that is the one that is used. Jon698 (talk) 23:57, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good, thank you! Chomik! (talk?) 02:04, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on April 7

[edit]

Easter Oratorio

Nikolaikirche, Leipzg, in 1749
Nikolaikirche, Leipzg, in 1749
  • ... that the first known collaboration of Bach and Picander resulted in the Shepherd Cantata and, mostly with the same music, the future Easter Oratorio, first performed at St. Nikolai (depicted) for Easter 1725? Source: several
    • Reviewed: Carl Vincenti
    • Comment: I would like this for Easter, 20 April. It's taken by a GA reviewer but not yet GA, but we can already think about it.
Created by Gerda Arendt (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 2141 past nominations.

Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:20, 7 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]

  • The currently proposed hook is somewhat complicated and hard to read. May I suggest a shorter and simpler hook?
ALT1 ... that in contrast to Bach's Christmas Oratorio, his Easter Oratorio has no Evangelist narrator providing Biblical text?
One of my other concerns with the original hook is that it is also reliant on knowing who Picander is; Bach is obviously a well-known name even to the general public, but Picander is less so. I'm trying to come up with a shorter/simplified version of ALT0 that's also less reliant on knowing who Picander is, but I'm drawing a blank, so if you don't mind, I'm asking 4meter4 or CurryTime7-24 to propose a shorter/simplified version of ALT0 for the benefit of the reviewer. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 11:40, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
We would miss 1) the quirkiness that Bach found the same music suitable for shepherds male and female exchanging pleasantries and Biblical characters facing the empty tomb, 2) the 300 years anniversary, and 3) the first collab with Picander, the author of the St. Matthew Passion and probably the Christmas Oratorio, so good to know, - I didn't know. Also: ALT1 has no music whatsoever, just a dry formal aspect. Interesting? It also tells much more about the Christmas Oratorio than the other to those who didn't know that, and almost nothing to those who knew that already. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:26, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
In ALT0, you might skip the church, of course, especially as it was performed in the other the same day, but it forms the link to the image. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:30, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Narutolovehinata5: Let me read this article over later tonight or maybe tomorrow afternoon. Honestly, I don't think the quirkiness really comes through in the prolix ALT0. —CurryTime7-24 (talk) 02:26, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@CurryTime7-24: How do these wordings sound?
ALT0a ... that Johann Sebastian Bach and his frequent collaborator Picander wrote an oratorio for Easter?
ALT0b ... that Johann Sebastian Bach and his frequent collaborator Picander wrote an oratorio for Easter, which premiered at Leipzig's St. Nikolai church (depicted) in Easter 1725?
If they don't work out, maybe we will need to move on from this particular angle. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 07:52, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Both factually wrong, sorry. How about reading the article (which isn't even GA yet)? Bach had no idea about any oratorio until 10 years after this happened. This piece was named oratorio 13 years later (and it's debatable if it even is one, - not much changed from the cantata is was in 1725, just the name and a bit of scoring). Collaboration wasn't yet frequent, and their greatest work together came three years later. This is the beginning! Which I believe is interesting! More interesting that they did something very clever: use the same music for both a scenic dinner entertainment about shepherds here and an Easter cantata there! This cleverness should show, and if you can word it better than I could you can make me happy. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:07, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Narutolovehinata5 and Gerda Arendt: Before this nomination can continue, I need to point out an issue with this article. While working to add new information, I discovered that the article conflates two related, but separate pieces of music: the Easter Cantata and the Easter Oratorio. The article appears to be about the latter, but the "History" is devoted solely to the former (and its secular model). If it's OK with Gerda, I may need to substantially modify the "History" section. —CurryTime7-24 (talk) 19:05, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Firstly: those two pieces are not very different. Secondly: it is mentioned in lead and history that in 1738, Bach wrote a new score, with a few modifications, and then called it Oratorio. The article title is the latter for several reasons: most recordings use that, it's less German, and it was the title when I met the article. - Go ahead, but please don't tell me it's conflating. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:14, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Well, Gerda, they still are two different scores, composed for separate occasions, and with separate performance/reception histories. It's not me saying this (I'm, admittedly, not too familiar with a lot of Bach's music)—it's Christoph Wolff. While he does say that the modifications Bach made were relatively few, the ones he did make were, according to Wolff, "quite remarkable" and that it changed the character of the music from theatrical to devotional. —CurryTime7-24 (talk) 19:24, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
"from theatrical to devotional": that is his interpretation of Bach in 1938 omitting the names of characters and just assigning voice parts, which is in the article. Dürr says about the same. It doesn't change the music. It's still dance music. - There is no reception history of the cantata, as for practically all his church cantatas. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:29, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Again, I'm just the messenger. Please kindly convey your disagreement in written form to Dr. Wolff, c/o W. W. Norton & Company. :) —CurryTime7-24 (talk) 20:22, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
No ;) - I found and added a source that everybody can see, by Wolff, 2010, about a "trilogy of oratorios". It has the dates of two of them wrong (saying 1735 instead of current state of the art 1738). Bach Digital (not I) corrected Mr. Wolff. His ideas are interesting, but need to be put in perspective. As I tried to say: that Bach omitted the names is fact, that it means from theatrical to devotional is interpretation which I avoided. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:37, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@CurryTime7-24 What exactly is the issue here? Are you saying that Gerda is engaging in WP:SYNTH? Or are you saying the history section is WP:UNDUE or in error? If what Gerda is saying is true, then Bach merely recycled an older work and made modifications to it. This happened a lot in the baroque and classical eras, and we often cover pieces like this together in history sections in order to provide context. For example the article on the aria "Lascia ch'io pianga" also covers the earlier aria " "Lascia la spina, cogli la rosa" because they have almost identical music (some minor instrumentation differences), but different text, and it covers the even earlier instrumental sarabande from Almira from which the melody originated. This seems like a similar situation where an earlier piece was reworked and put in a new context. The newer piece evolved from the older one, and the history section should cover this. One can't understand the later work properly if one doesn't have the context of the older work from which it was taken. I'm not convinced that the history section as presented is either inaccurate or undue or original synthesis. Lastly, Gerda is extremely well read in Bach literature/scholarship, and is active performer in a Bach ensemble. Much of our coverage on Bach and his works has been written by her (particularly the many Bach cantata articles). So if she's saying something in a text is outdated or in error when it comes to a Bach related article I at the very least would stop, listen, and look at the evidence. Bach is her area of expertise.4meter4 (talk) 16:11, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

it's GA now --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:11, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment. @Narutolovehinata5 and Gerda Arendt I think too many facts are thrown into the original, and that the alt hooks unfortunately are inaccurate because they miss the nuances of the way this work evolved over time and the extant to which Picander was involved with the work at different stages. I don't think mentioning the church is needed because its inclusion is not adding interest and is distracting from the article being featured. For classical musical buffs, we all know about Bach's lengthy tenure at the St. Nicholas Church and St. Thomas Church, Leipzig so it seems extraneous, and for those who aren't classical music buffs it seems trivial. I would oppose using this photograph as well because the image has nothing to do directly with the oratorio. The painting dates to nearly 25 years after the composition premiered, and is very nominally relevant to the oratorio. I propose the following hook below.4meter4 (talk) 21:46, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Alt0c ... that the Easter Oratorio (1734) recycled music from the Shepherd Cantata which was the first known work produced by Johann Sebastian Bach with his frequent collaborator Picander?
I'm confused with the above 4meter4: so basically, the article is just fine and there's nothing to worry about the issues CT raised, and instead the main issue here is the hook? Having said that, ALT0c sounds okay. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 22:39, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
ALT0C is factually wrong because there was no Easter Oratorio in 1725. Bach's earliest oratorio dates from 1734. As the article says. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 23:18, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Gerda Arendt Than the info box in the article is either in error or confusing and needs to be fixed to say the premiere was in 1734. If you want to make a distinction with the cantata you need to make a clear differentiation in the infobox which is about the oratorio. @Narutolovehinata5 It just passed a GA review. I, nor the GA reviewer, am not seeing a problem. CT hasn't replied back here, and honestly I don't think that CT has truly read all of the literature here and is not necessarily forming an opinion based on all of the materials. The issue appears to be based on a single scholar's work, which apparently has been corrected as being in error in newer materials used by Gerda that has better more accurate scholarship. Best.4meter4 (talk) 00:38, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
In any case, given the concerns raised with ALT0, I've struck it. Both commenters have suggested that a snappier wording is needed, possibly one that only mentions the essential details. @4meter4: Is the only issue with ALT0c what Gerda raised, or it's actually correct and it's the article that's currently wrong? If this is resolved, we can probably request a new review for ALT0c (or whatever revision to it). Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 05:47, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
(edit conflict) I thought the development of the oratorios was clear now but will have to expand it further, also the infobox. It was the Christmas Oratorio, Bach's first oratorio, that premiered in 1734. The Easter Oratorio, under this name - well, actually in Latin - was premiered in 1938. However, the cantata premiered in 1725 was basically the very same music, which Bach was able to repurpose to the oratorio concept without major changes because, as the Shepherd Cantata, it had been theatrical from the start, and so was Bach's earliest oratorio (just not named so), before the St Matthew Passion even, with that same Picander.
Dropping the pic wish (motivated by the wish for both more prominence and a clear placement at a glance in the 18th century):
ALT0d: ... that the first known collaboration of Bach and Picander resulted in the Shepherd Cantata and, mostly with the same music, the future Easter Oratorio, first performed for Easter 1725?
The following might be clearer regarding the 1725 event being the future Easter Oratorio, but would miss saying that the 1738 music was still "mostly the same":
ALT0e: ... that the first known collaboration of Bach and Picander resulted in 1725 in the Shepherd Cantata for a birthday and for Easter, mostly with the same music, the future Easter Oratorio?
I thought about including that it was Picander who would write the St Matthew Passion, to clarify why he is important, but wasn't able to do that on top of the complexity that comes from three stages of the Easter music (well, actually four stages, the last with no more chorus, so more oratorio style even, not mentioned).
That's as concise as I can get including three stages of one music, important per music history and a high holiday and a centenary, and saying something about the early beginnings (two years before the St Matthew Passion) of Bach and Picander working together cleverly and the future Easter Oratorio. All sources call underrated. It should be known more. Improvement of hooka ia welcome, but not shortening to being wrong. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:19, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I think the issues with ALT0d/ALT0e are: 1. they require familiarity with Picander; again, while Bach is reasonably well-known, Picander is less so, so at least some context as to who Picander is would be necessary, and 2. they don't exactly flow very well. It might be hard to understand for you as English is not your first language, but the grammar is a bit on the clunky side and also long. I still think ALT0c (assuming it has no more remaining factual issues, or is otherwise modified to address them) flows better and largely gives the same idea. @4meter4: can you please modify ALT0c to address any remaining factual issues, or perhaps you can edit the article to address any remaining concerns? Both CT and 4meter4 expressed concerns about hooks being too wordy, and ALT0c at least strives to address that concern. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 08:42, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
ALT0c is wrong as it's written because there was no idea of any oratorio by Bach in 1725. Misleading. - You and I will not agree that any hook requires to be already familiar with anything linked, here Picander, just the opposite: he is mentioned to arouse interest in him, the person without whom we would not have the St Matthew Passion. (Did you see how many clicked on Pavarotti yesterday?) There is a link. Many will already know the name as he is supposed to have written the Christmas Oratorio also. The early collaboration, before all of the other masterworks, and then with the clever plan to use the music for both Shepherds' flattery and followers' missing of Jesus, is interesting, and for me the most surprising and good-to-know news there is about this piece. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:12, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Alt0f ... that the 1738 Easter Oratorio recycled music from the 1725 Shepherd Cantata, the first known joint work produced by Johann Sebastian Bach and his frequent collaborator Picander?--Launchballer 21:23, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I like the approach. I fixed the year to 1738. However, "recycled" isn't quite right to express that it seems to have been planned from the start that two very different texts should suit the same music for very different occasions, both in 1725, the year of the first collaboration. It's a problem that, while the Easter Oratorio was basically again the same music in 1738, it was already heard without that name for Easter 1925, which is the anniversary, not the other. - Any hook: we should pipe to Bach or J. S. Bach. Compare:
ALT0g: ... that the first known collaboration of Bach and Picander resulted in 1725 in two works with mostly the same music, the Shepherd Cantata for a birthday and the future Easter Oratorio? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:04, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I still think Launchballer's wording is better: it flows better, it puts the Oratorio's name at the start, and "recycled" isn't inherently wrong since it doesn't necessarily mean he copied everything, just that he copied. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 10:57, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I am not surprised. Could you perhaps also let others comment? Launchballer, for example. There was no "recycling", and certainly not in 1738, when Bach just wrote a new score. But even in 1725, there was no "recycling" (as I understand the word) but a clever plan from the start to use the music for two mightily different purposes. The oratorio has no tricentenary this year but in 2038, - saying 1738 only is misleading, especially regarding the beginning of the collaboration. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:28, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Trying to please:
ALT0h: ... that in 1725, J. S. Bach used the same music for the future Easter Oratorio and the Shepherd Cantata for a Duke's birthday, helped by librettist Picander in their first known collaboration? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:49, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Re ALT0e. Content OK, but not snappy, and does not run smoothly.
Re ALT0f. Thanks for that, Launchballer, it might have been OK, but in this context "recycled" has a connotation of shabbiness or laziness. Can you find another word?
Re ALT0g. That would be OK, but it's a bit long and not snappy. Can we just list the new works and leave out the birthday and future?
Re ALT0h. That would run nicely and smoothly if you missed out "in their first known collaboration". The readers can get that bit when they read the article; they don't need it in the hook.
ALT0i: ... that in 1725, J. S. Bach and librettist Picander used the same music for the future Easter Oratorio and the Shepherd Cantata for a Duke's birthday? Storye book (talk) 18:02, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
ALT0j: ... that the 1738 Easter Oratorio reused music from the 1725 Shepherd Cantata, the first known joint work produced by Johann Sebastian Bach and his frequent collaborator Picander? Interpolated would work also.--Launchballer 16:41, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
(commenting here at Gerda's invitation). I think the reason this is tricky is because we're trying to squeeze in a lot of interesting info into one hook. I think of all the options, I like this latest by Launchballer (Alt0j, tho I do not understand the numbering system here!) the best. It is the easiest to parse (i.e. not as clunky as some of the options), and does a good job of keeping the most important/interesting information, as well as efficiently clarifying who Picander is. The unincluded info is, IMHO, also interesting, but there's just too much of it (if DYK was 2 sentences I'd say include it, but it isn't). I don't really like the formulations that refer to Easter Oratorio as a relative "future" work; it's the targeted article. I prefer this formulation. FWIW. --Floquenbeam (talk) 20:27, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
ALT0j has a few problems:
  1. Bach comes too late or would you think people would be interested in some Easter Oratorio without composer?
  2. 1738 comes too soon to understand it's 300 years, which was the only reason to expand that article now.
ALT0i has the problem that Picander can't be a subject for the verb "used the same music". Per your suggestion:
ALT0k: ... that in 1725, J. S. Bach used the same music for the future Easter Oratorio and the Shepherd Cantata for a Duke's birthday?
ALT0l: ... that in 1725, J. S. Bach used the same music for the future Easter Oratorio and the Shepherd Cantata for a Duke's birthday to poetry by Picander?
I like ALT0h better because the "first" hints at Picander becoming a regular collaborator. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:09, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think 1725 coming after 1738 is a big enough problem that we should refer to the targeted article as a future work. That said, ALT0m: ... that the 1738 Easter Oratorio reused music from the 1725 Bach and Picander collaboration Shepherd Cantata, their first of many?--Launchballer 13:12, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You don't think ... but I know that the article expansion happened only because Easter 2025 is 300 years after the first performance of the Easter music, not the Shepherd cantata, and that is missing in ALT0m. Instead, we are made believe that the oratorio was composed in 1738, but it was composed in 1725, - only renamed in 1738, which makes it the earliest-composed of Bach's 3 oratorios, and even earlier than the St. Matthew Passion. Which is interesting, I think. You are good in phrasing: can you try? - Any admin around? WT:DYK#Good Friday needs attention even sooner, like in a few hours. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:41, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I think the main issue with these new proposals, particularly ALT0k and ALT0l is that they don't give any context as to who Picander is. It's been a recurring issue with your proposals and is something that isn't ideal, especially when neither Picander nor his frequent collaborations with Bach are necessarily well-known among the general public. For reference, WP:DYKHOOKSTYLE states Make sure to provide any necessary context for your hook; don't assume everyone worldwide is familiar with your subject. What may be obvious to you or indeed other classical music experts may not be common knowledge to the general public. I don't see what the issue is with ALT0j: to me at least, the opposition to it feels more like nitpicking rather than any actual hook errors. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 14:14, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It's a recurring issue that you don't understand that if there is a link, readers don't have to know but can find out. We will have many readers who know who Picander is (or won't care anyway): why bore them in the few characters we have with who he is? It's not sure that he wrote the text for the music heard on Easter Sunday 1725, only most likely. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:52, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see the harm in at least explaining, even briefly, who Picander is, as part of introducing him. If the point of the hook is to introduce who Picander is, at least mentioning how he is relevant to Bach seems more ideal than just mentioning his name without context; not saying who he is would make readers care less about him. If it isn't sure that he wrote the music for the 1725, wouldn't that put the entire hook's viability into question? Asking 4meter4 again regarding the above claim to clarify if there are indeed concerns about if Picander was involved or not. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 22:54, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
(I see how well you read by saying "If it isn't sure that he wrote the music" talking about Picander.) I came with a good unusual story, the original hook, which tells everybody without special knowledge that 1) there was a great piece performed for Easter 1725 (actually to become one of three oratorios by one of the most celebrated composers ever), 2) that there was some beginning of collaboration of two people, 3) that the piece shared music with another piece of different character, - I think that is interesting information enough, without needing to know who precisely these two people were. - I came to tell a good story for Good Friday (today) about Johannes-Passion (Gubaidulina). --Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:56, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
To be honest, had you agreed to ALT0f or even ALT0j, the hook would probably already be in Queue right now since multiple editors were fine with it and were ready to agree to it. The apparent nitpicking regarding hook wording, rather than going with an option that already had multiple editors open to it (ALT0j/ALT0f) is what is causing the nomination to get delayed. If the hook ultimately fails to run on Easter, it is not through the fault of editors who did their best to propose and discuss hooks that would have appealed to the general public while also not being too overly detailed or complicated. Considering how it is becoming less likely the nomination will be approved in time: 1. would you be open to agreeing to ALT0j given editor openness to it, so that the hook can run on time, or 2. would you be open to the hook running on any day other than Easter? Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 07:06, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I don't like a hook that is factually wrong. Nothing was recycled or reused in 1738, it happened in 1725. You could still approve j, if you don't see that. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:24, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • I was about to approve ALT0j, but right now there's an issue with the article. Actually multiple. Firstly, I can't actually see any sentence in the article, apart from the lede, that outright says the Oratorio reused music from the Shepherd Cantata. Instead, if my understanding is correct, Bach reused the Shepherd Cantata's music for the 1725 Easter Cantata (not Oratorio), which was then reused for the Oratorio. As such, the reuse actually seems to be indirect in this case rather than direct.
In addition, the "Oratorio (1738)" section also does not directly mention that he reused the Shepherd Cantata's music for the Easter Oratorio, but rather he reused the Easter Cantata for that purpose. The sentence stating this, "For Easter 1738, Bach could use the 1725 Easter cantata basically at it was." also lacks a footnote. There's also an inconsistency between the lede and the article: the lede claims that the Easter Oratorio was different from Bach's other oratorios in lacking an Evangelist narrator, but the article only compares it to the Christmas Oratorio and not in general.
Given the issues with the Shepherd Cantata/Easter Cantata angle, we may have to move away from that one. Depending on how the article and lede are reconciled, we could revisit ALT1 and have something like:
ALT1a ... that unlike his other oratorios, Bach's Easter Oratorio does not feature an Evangelist narrator?
If that's not feasible, we may have to go with a completely different angle. I don't think we could go with the Duke's birthday angle as it's still ultimately tied to the Shepherd Cantata. ALT2 might not pass scrutiny as it's technically a hook about song lyrics, a hook format that has been discouraged at DYK due to the association with WP:DYKFICTION. Inviting 4meter4, CurryTime7-24, Launchballer, and Floquenbeam for feedback regarding possible new hook angles/wordings, as well as to address the concerns raised above. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 01:02, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Forgot to ping Grimes2 as well. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 01:02, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Given the concerns raised above, I've struck all hooks reliant on the Shepherd Cantata angle; they can be revisited and unstruck on an individual basis once the issues I raised are resolved. ALT2 is left unstruck as it remains open as an alternative, especially if others disagree with the "use of lyrics in a hook" objection. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 01:17, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Please read the article again. The music for the oratorio is the same (with minor scoring differences) as the cantata. Happy Easter - I celebrate until Tuesday. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:07, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I did, and other than the lede the connection between the Shepherd Cantata and the Easter Oratorio is indirect at best. That has to be made clearer in the article, that that the Oratorio used the Shepherd Cantata's music, rather than the current version where it says so in a roundabout way (it used the Easter Cantata as a basis, which itself used the Shepherd Cantata as a basis). Even if that was resolved, one of the sentences that verifies that fact, "For Easter 1738, Bach could use the 1725 Easter cantata basically at it was," lacks a footnote. Now that I think about it, several of the variations of ALT0 are unsuitable since they actually seem to be more about the Easter Cantata than the Oratorio itself, and generally we want to avoid hooks where the bolded article is only tangentially related to the main hook fact. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 07:56, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
"For Easter 1738, Bach could use the 1725 Easter cantata basically at it was." - In the table of the music, how many changes are there, things in brackets that indicated differences to earlier versions? (... and one of the changes relates to a change in the 1740s, after oratorio) - I will try clarification, but not today or tomorrow. Church, going outoors and company. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:57, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Back to work. After we missed the chance to point at this work on the anniversary we can of course say things unrelated to the anniversary. I gave it a rewrite, with better sourcing. Pick what you like. Most beautiful score. "No Evangelist, no Biblical text, no chorale" if you have to say what it is not. I should probably unwatch ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:11, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Given the above, right now only ALT1a and ALT2 should remain in consideration as the concerns regarding the Shepherd Cantata angle remain unaddressed. I should point out that the Evangelist angle also still lacks direct referencing in the article, so that will need to be addressed before this is ready for a new review; pinging Grimes2 and Thoughtfortheday to address these concerns. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 23:36, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    I don't know what you expect. That there is no Biblical text includes that there is no Evangelist (who would report Biblical text). Do you need a ref for the other oratorio's having an Evangelist? That could be copied from the other articles. I just find poor to only say what it is not.
    ALT3: ... that the autograph manuscript that J. S. Bach made in 1738 of music he had composed in 1725, calling it Easter Oratorio, has been described as one of his most beautiful scores?
    ALT4: ... that J. S. Bach performed his St John Passion and his Easter Oratorio in 1749, the year before his death?
    He must have loved these two pieces. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:02, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
ALT3a: ... that J. S. Bach's 1738 autograph manuscript of his 1725 Easter Oratorio has been described as one of his most beautiful scores? Storye book (talk) 10:11, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for trying, but in 1725, there was no oratorio. (I guess it's the fifths time I write that in this thread.) It's remained the same music but the name came only in 1738, with that copy. I guess I'll have to write a still different lead. Or should I rename the article? See Ascension Oratorio which is only a redirect. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:19, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Beginning of the soprano aria, with the end of the first recitative
Beginning of the soprano aria, with the end of the first recitative
ALT3b: ... that J. S. Bach's 1738 autograph manuscript of his Easter Oratorio has been described as one of his most beautiful scores (page pictured)?
Thank you, modified for caution, quoting from the article. I don't think that someone not knowing what score means will find an answer in sheet music ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:31, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the modification. I linked "score(s)" to sheet music because the WP definition includes both handwritten and printed music in that - but mainly because I thought the great unwashed would probably think "score" meant sport/gaming scores, and would not connect it with the autograph manuscript at all. ;-) Storye book (talk) 11:37, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I like ALT3b, but I think it would be for the best for this to get a review from an uninvolved and unpinged/non-messaged editor. Having said that, among the available hooks, ALT3b is my favorite. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 12:26, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article is still in need of a full review, ideally from a non-messaged uninvolved editor. ALT3b in particular needs a checking. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 00:09, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Grow up, Naruto. You frequently message CurryTime7-24, 4meter4 and others, openly on Gerda's nominations, for comments which may possibly back up your views, for example views on wordiness. So please stop making snidy, veiled aspersions about other people getting messaged. Note: I have no personal objection to Curry Time and 4meter4, or to their contributions, but if you block people messaged by Gerda, then in principle you are also blocking people messaged by yourself. Therefore I suggest that you withdraw the above comment about messaging. Storye book (talk) 08:38, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    take it easy, - I didn't even read it this way, I just grinned about generously inviting independent reviewers after having made a personal selection of possible hooks. Who knows, a different independent reviewer might have approved ALT0. Imagine ... --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:55, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Here's the thing: when I pinged 4meter4 and CurryTime to this nomination, I made it clear that it was only for hook suggestions, and not to review the hooks. Indeed, when I asked for a "non-messaged uninvolved editor", this includes both 4meter4 and CurryTime (as well as Launchballer for that matter), meaning someone who hasn't commented on the nomination yet and wasn't specifically invited to review the nomination. This is to ensure an impartial review regardless of what hook is ultimately picked; it's also one reason I begged off from giving a review myself. In any case, I suggest you modify your comment above as others may consider it as uncivil. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 14:12, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    What modification do you wish from me? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:17, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Apologies Gerda: my comment was directed towards Storye book and not towards you. I'm happy with ALT3b and would endorse it being approved if another reviewer says so. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 14:18, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    How could I see that it was for Storye book when you indented as a reply to me? I won't fix it now or my question would look silly. I fixed the bullet though, or my comment below looks silly. There's no rush. Once we missed the 300 years, a day more or less doesn't matter, - Eastertide until Ascension Day. I made my story today about Werner Thissen instead of the Johannes-Passion DYK which should have come on Good Friday, only to find out that his funeral was today, - good timing once in a month, per chance. The clergy was dressed for Easter. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:31, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    I guess it could be inferred from context, but my intention was for the comment was to have the same indention as your comment that said "take it easy". I guess I accidentally inserted another colon. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 14:35, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    You are all invited to leave comments about what could be improved in the FAC. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:54, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    I added an image which shows more than 1000 words. I know that sheet music is not ideal but this one looks interesting even when small, and would hopefully invite to look at it, which might be more educational than looking at the article. The caption is too long, feel free to trim. I took the liberty to add it next to ALT3b, and fix the ALT. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:33, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article now GA. Images are both good. Support ALT3b as that is agreed upon by all. Thriley (talk) 22:11, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • I was going to promote this because I think File:Nikolaikirche Leipzg 1749 (Kupferstich) Foto H.-P.Haack.JPG is a great image and wanted to use it. But I see ALT3b is the only hook approved and that uses a different image; one which I think won't work well at all on the main page. Also, I'm currently reviewing this for FAC; I don't think that disqualifies me from promoting it, but instead I'll just leave my comments and hope somebody can find a way to use the better image. RoySmith (talk) 14:04, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    • ALT3c: ... that J. S. Bach's 1738 autograph manuscript of his Easter Oratorio, first performed at St. Nikolai (pictured), has been described as one of his most beautiful scores? (155 characters excl. ellipsis and pictured). Storye book (talk) 15:57, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
      • I like it. I'd drop the "J.S." unless you think somebody would confuse him with P.D.Q. RoySmith-Mobile (talk) 18:11, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
      • sorry (I meant to unwatch ...) to spoil the fun. ALT3c has the same problem that some earlier hooks had: when this music was first performed at that church (1725) it was not yet named an oratorio (1738), nor had Bach written anything named oratorio (1734). This would be good to know, but can't be seen in the short hook, and even could get us to ERRORS. Minor: when we have a pic of the church, I believe we can have its name (shorter) in German (also a little indication of where this plays, and perhaps include Leipzig). I try to avoid "St." for Protestant churches (as a little indication that this is Lutheran). --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:10, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
        • If we being pedantic over the current name being ahistoric to the time of a separately-specified manuscript, could the hook add "what became known as" - I too come here having wanted to promote the hook with the Nikolaikirche image (a lovely image for MP) and seeing it held up on technicality. Kingsif (talk) 01:03, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
          • We could, please word it. I was trained to keep things short, and would much like to illustrate the hook with what it talks about than a connection that's far-fetched and unfair - the same music was played in the other church also, the same day. We could run the church image some other day with some other piece. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:52, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on April 8

[edit]

Charles Moses (sprinter)

5x expanded by Habst (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 330 past nominations.

BeanieFan11 (talk) 22:06, 17 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]

  • Thank you for nominating this as I didn't do it in time. I'm not sure if it would be a conflict for me to review it because I did the expansion? --Habst (talk) 22:09, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article is new enough (given a 2-day leeway on the seven day criterion), long enough, article looks good on quality and presentation, hook is cited, short enough, and interesting. QPQ done. My only question is around the licensing of the image - it was uploaded based on the lack of copyright notice, and indeed there doesn't appear to be one on the page the image is from, but there is one on the first page of the newspaper. I'm not well versed enough in that specific license template to know if this qualifies that particular image as being copyrighted, so I'll see if I can get a second opinion. Sam Walton (talk) 11:41, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Highlighting his untruthfulness violates WP:DYKHOOKBLP. Isn't there something more positive we can say about him? RoySmith (talk) 15:28, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    • I'm not sure it unduly ("to an unwarranted degree; inordinately") focuses on a negative aspect; (i) it mentions that he did later compete at the Olympics, and (ii) the majority of significant coverage of him was related to his Olympic claims (given that he's arguably best "known" for that, I don't think its necessarily undue to have a hook based on it). Can you think of a better hook? BeanieFan11 (talk) 15:45, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
      • Reading the article, I don't see anything obvious that would make a better hook. Which leads me to believe we should just pass on running this one. We've got more nominations than we can handle; no need to contort ourselves to run marginal articles. RoySmith (talk) 18:48, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
        • What do you mean "contort ourselves to run marginal articles"? I don't think its fair to just fail articles because "we've got more than we can handle". BeanieFan11 (talk) 19:29, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
          • I would like to run the subject but not before the actual article itself is given a good check in line with sources. With every other sentence in the article saying "claimed" or similar, it does read like Wikipedia believes Moses to be a perpetual liar and - at that point - what would we even have a bio for. There are probably quite a few of these statements that can be written as factual or at least written with attribution (and importantly without the wikivoice hedging). Also see WP:CLAIMED. Like, yeah, if information is only attested in one source it may seem 'safer' to hedge, but if it's presented as truth, and the source is sound, we can treat the information as V. As written, I would not be happy to put the article on MP, as much as the subject seems suitable. Kingsif (talk) 02:10, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

3D mousepad

3D mousepads for sale in Tokyo
3D mousepads for sale in Tokyo
Created by Morgan695 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 169 past nominations.

Morgan695 (talk) 17:01, 8 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]

Articles created/expanded on April 9

[edit]

Sunset Dunes

  • ALT1: ... that San Francisco's newest park is located on an oceanfront road that is now permanently closed to cars? Source: https://sfrecpark.org/1555/Sunset-Dunes (In April 2020, the Great Highway was closed to vehicles from Lincoln to Sloat to provide recreational opportunities and social distancing space during the COVID-19 pandemic. In August 2021, the Great Highway reopened to vehicular traffic on weekdays while retaining the weekend park usage. In December 2022, the Board of Supervisors passed legislation establishing the Great Highway Pilot, a hybrid usage plan that closed the road to vehicles on holidays and weekends and, during which, traffic and visitor data was collected on the Great Highway’s use as both a roadway and park. In November 2024, San Francisco voters approved the passage of Proposition K, which transforms the Upper Great Highway to a permanent 24/7 recreational public park for walking, biking, rolling and more.)
  • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Choquei
  • Comment: I'll do the QPQ later today.
Created by BaduFerreira (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 7 past nominations.

BaduFerreira (talk) 23:24, 16 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]

  • Review by Noleander
  • Overall - Passed review.
  • New: Okay: Article was created 9 April 2025, nominated 16 April.
  • Hook: Fairly interesting: in USA it is rare to replace a road with a park; and this particular park location is very noteworthy. Primary hook is superior to Alt2 hook, in my judgement.
  • Hook length is under 200 characters
  • Verifiable: All important facts in article have citations. I did a spot check of about half the cites, and they are valid.
  • Size: tool shows size is 2910 B (476 words) ... which meets the DYK requirements, I believe.
  • Source for hook: Yes, a source is provided, and I looked at it.
  • Plagiarism - I ran the Earwig copyvio tool and max % was 16%, which is within tolerances.
  • POV: Article is neutral and factual.
  • Images: article has one image, and it contains appropriate free use justification.
  • Quid Pro Quo - Nominator says they have NOT done it yet; Cannot approve DYK until that is completed.
@BaduFerreira: Can you ping me when you've done the QPQ? Thanks. Noleander (talk) 02:41, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Noleander (talk) 02:10, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on April 12

[edit]

Iblis

Iblis (right) guards the Divine Garden.
Iblis (right) guards the Divine Garden.
  • Source: Barry, M. A. (2004). Figurative art in medieval Islam and the riddle of Bihzad of Herat (1465-1535). Flammarion.: 246
  • Reviewed:
Improved to Good Article status by VenusFeuerFalle (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

VenusFeuerFalle (talk) 14:49, 14 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]

  • Please read the rules - there are NO LINKS!!! - you need at least 4 here. Put them in & I'll finish the review. Johnbod (talk) 21:00, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    • Ok, you have now done so. GA, AGF on hook fact/ref (the hook is virtually a quote from the article). The hook is not very clear, but nor is the article, frankly. No qpq needed. The pic is ok, if rather tall, but the caption waaaay too long! You won't get more than say "Iblis (right) guards the Divine Garden. Johnbod (talk) 01:48, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
      • Johnbod, this doesn't really strike me as a "yes". I agree the hook is unclear to the average reader. I think a clearer one should be promoted, and the image is not clear at displayed size. Zanahary 05:04, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
        • It was a yes, but a clearer/snappier hook might be better. I don't feel qualified to suggest one, but as always, anyone else may do so. I can probably understand it better than many of our readers as I know what the Upanishads are, and who Dara Shikoh was. Johnbod (talk) 03:16, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
          • Not sure if I missed something, but what is the consensus about the hook now? is it fine or do I need somethign else to do?VenusFeuerFalle (talk) 12:41, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
            • I'm not sure either. It passed review as far as I'm concerned. Perhaps one of those who like fiddling with hooks at the last minute will find a better hook after promotion. Zanahary? Johnbod (talk) 16:11, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
              • Just noting that the image is poor at thumb size, which is disappointing as it's a nice image overall and of a different art style than usually featured. If it's possible to isolate Iblis with a crop, that may make it clearer i.e. usable. Kingsif (talk) 01:06, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • VenusFeuerFalle I'd like to double-check the hook fact. Could you send me a copy of the appropriate page from Barry 2004? I can get it on inter-library loan, but it would probably be a lot faster if you could send me a scan. Thanks. RoySmith (talk) 17:42, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    • Sure. I have been back to the library yesterday to take a photo of the page. Would you mind telling me how I sent it to you?

Articles created/expanded on April 13

[edit]

Liechtenstein at the 1968 Summer Olympics

  • ... that when Liechtenstein sent athletes to compete at the 1968 Summer Olympics, they only sent athletes who competed in athletics?
5x expanded by History6042 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

History6042😊 (Contact me) 15:05, 13 April 2025 (UTC). I like this hook very much; it is clever in its wordplay, and interesting. The article is of sufficient length and the source is reliable (as explained here). It appears to be well written. For the reasons stated, I approve it. Will Thorpe (talk) 13:46, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

May I jump in here and suggest instead of linking to Athletics, which is rather ambiguous, it would make more sense to link to athletics or more specifically track and field? Annwfwn (talk) 21:17, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Done History6042😊 (Contact me) 21:38, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
A proper was never added, so this never made it to the approved queue. Sammi Brie (she/her · t · c) 00:13, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. History6042😊 (Contact me) 00:16, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sounder commuter rail

A Sounder train
A Sounder train
Improved to Good Article status by SounderBruce (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 254 past nominations.

SounderBruce 19:11, 13 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]

  • Article is a recent GA. QPQ completed. Copyvio not detected and referencing is adequate. All hooks verified in the sources and cited inline. Good to go - prefer ALT2. Something tells me you like the word "Sounder", but I can't quite say what. Juxlos (talk) 02:11, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    • Just a coincidence. Excuse me while I hide my paper trains. SounderBruce 04:09, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
      • I was going to promote this, noting my preference for alt1 as written but the reviewer's preference for alt2. In checking the article, I think we can make alt2 a bit more interesting without getting weird:
  • ALT3: ... that Sounder commuter rail (pictured) has been frequently disrupted by mudslides, with a seasonal record for cancelled trips reaching 170 in winter 2012–2013?
Kingsif (talk) 01:11, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Don't mind the switch, though ALT3 is a bit wordy. Also proposing a new image since, per the FAC, the current one is a bit unclear. SounderBruce 05:58, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A better crop of the image, but I don't think either is going to work on the MP, so I suggest running without an image. RoySmith (talk) 18:48, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A Sounder train
A Sounder train
I disagree that the crop is an improvement, it's worse - I generally dislike making photos unconventional dimensions, and especially so when it's to isolate the subject from its background/context when doing so is unnecessary (often, actually, having 'breathing room' around the subject is better). I think either of the current (original) proposed image or the previous one (now in the article under "Added trips and 2010s improvements") would be good for MP. The train's shape, rather unusual (and perhaps unique to the northern US states and Canada in my experience), as well as the wave design on it, is interesting. The current proposal also has some very pretty water in it that kinda matches up with the design on the train, so that's neat. Kingsif (talk) 22:08, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The problem is that in the original image, you can't even recognize that it's a train. I agree with you that my crop doesn't work either, so my labeling it as "a better crop" wasn't really accurate. How about File:Sounder-consist-full.jpg?

RoySmith (talk) 23:17, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on April 15

[edit]

Pandora (2002 novel)

Created by Lajmmoore (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 131 past nominations.

Lajmmoore (talk) 07:16, 16 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]

  • New enough and long enough. QPQ present. No textual issues but one hook issue: I'd suggest changing "bonkbuster" to "romance novel" because I'd ask for a link to bonkbuster, in the middle of two other links. Is this an acceptable change, Lajmmoore? Sammi Brie (she/her · t · c) 00:21, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Meng Sufen

  • ... that Chinese politician Meng Sufen led a 1993 investigation in Guizhou's Mashan region, sparking a donation campaign raising over 1.6 million yuan for poverty alleviation?
Created by Toadboy123 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 51 past nominations.

Toadboy123 (talk) 09:06, 16 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]

Articles created/expanded on April 16

[edit]

Buster Maddox

  • ... that despite being named in college as the best at his position in the U.S., football player Buster Maddox only appeared in one NFL game after getting injured in practice for an all-star game?
  • Source: All-American (which means "best at his position in the U.S." - I figured that international readers would benefit from having it explained in the hook), injury, one game
5x expanded by BeanieFan11 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 338 past nominations.

BeanieFan11 (talk) 23:51, 23 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]

  • Newly-promoted GA, meets the minimum size requirement. Sources are reliable, no concerns with POV or CV. Hook is interesting (poor guy!), cited, and present in the article. QPQ complete. Good to roll here. ♠PMC(talk) 23:06, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wicked!

Converted from a redirect by Lajmmoore (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 132 past nominations.

Lajmmoore (talk) 07:24, 17 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]

Good catch, thanks. Here's an alternative:
Rhain (he/him) 04:39, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
That seems to meet the rules if Rhain wants to tick it again. ~Darth StabroTalk • Contribs 01:14, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Happy to—it's practically identical, after all. Rhain (he/him) 01:16, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Rhain, Darth Stabro, and Lajmmoore: how do the hooks above meet WP:DYKFICTION? Rjjiii (talk) 20:24, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
My comment was about the sea of blue and I have no comment about the rest of the article or hook's eligibility or appropriateness. ~Darth StabroTalk • Contribs 20:27, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

...ALT2 ... that Jilly Cooper first wrote a sex scene where a character wears a condom in the 2006 novel Wicked!?

I think this is better - it's more about her writing the scene, rather than the internal plot of the novel. I'm quite new to nominating books, so have tripped on this previously, thanks for catching it Rjjiii Lajmmoore (talk) 20:37, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Lajmmoore: I've struck the objection above, and that does seem better but still feels rooted in fiction. If someone else approves it, I won't object though. You might also try posting to WT:DYK to get some feedback and ideas from regulars. Good luck, Rjjiii (talk) 00:58, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Selby rail crash

  • Source: "£30m paid out after the Selby train crash" [5]
  • ALT1: ... that a car driver falling asleep led to the Selby rail crash? Source: "a jury decided that he had fallen asleep at the wheel of his Land Rover before it plunged off the M62, causing the rail crash last February." [6]
  • Reviewed: [[]]
Improved to Good Article status by FozzieHey (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

FozzieHey (talk) 15:21, 20 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: None required.

Overall: new Good Article, well sourced. I personally find ALT1 more interesting but I'm ok with ALT0 as well. Good to go! Annwfwn (talk) 21:29, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on April 17

[edit]

Robert Allen Norris

Moved to mainspace by Hawkeye7 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 444 past nominations.

Hawkeye7 (discuss) 22:34, 17 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]

  •  Comment: @Hawkeye7: Earwig's Copyvio Detector shows 37.9% similarity to fn2 (Crawford, Robert L. (2010) In Memoriam: Robert Allen Norris," Oriole: 75 (3).) While is says "Violation unlikely", even before running the tool, some key phrases stuck in my mind as being nearly the same as the "In Memoriam" piece. Some minor editing should easily address this. — ERcheck (talk) 22:18, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Good to go. NOTES: (1) Disclosure. I made some minor rewording edits to the article to make a few phrases less similar to the sources. (2) The nomination had a single hook, which works, though not all readers may be familiar with A Tale of Two Cities, I've made a suggestion for ALT1 below. — ERcheck (talk) 16:12, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Fred Borak

5x expanded by BeanieFan11 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 339 past nominations.

BeanieFan11 (talk) 23:43, 24 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: 7118 B and GA three days before nom. I also fixed some close paraphrases and an excess quote, which the GA review apparently missed. Otherwise, no copyvios or other issues, prefer ALT0, and GA review checks out. (And can you not believe this was expanded from what was originally a mass redirect? This is why BEFORE helps.) ミラP@Miraclepine 02:10, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Darko Pešić

5x expanded by Riley1012 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 38 past nominations.

Riley1012 (talk) 01:21, 18 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]

  • Article recently expanded. Referencing is adequate, hook fact is interesting, cited inline, and verified in source. QPQ is provided. Earwig check clears, so good to go. Juxlos (talk) 07:36, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on April 18

[edit]

James Ashcroft

  • Source: James Ashcroft
The Rule of Jenny Pen
    • Reviewed:
Created by Blackballnz (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

Blackballnz (talk) 04:10, 20 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]

  • ...New Zealander James Ashcroft enjoys “playing in the dark” and has directed two psychological horror films based on short stories by kiwi writer Owen Marshall.

Here's another version. How's this?Blackballnz (talk) 02:47, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

As currently written, that doesn't meet WP:DYKINT. I'd personally shorten it to just: ... that New Zealander director James Ashcroft enjoys "playing in the dark"? Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 03:28, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine by me. This is the source of the quote: https://thespinoff.co.nz/pop-culture/19-03-2025/i-enjoy-playing-in-the-dark-inside-james-ashcrofts-latest-nightmare Blackballnz (talk) 06:01, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Review New enough, long enough, sourced well enough. Copyvio free according to Earwig (only quotes are copied). Article doesn't have an infobox but is still presentable, though would recommend splitting into sections and merging paragraphs. Hook is cited and interesting. (something like ALT1: ... that James Ashcroft wants to "stick something serious down [the audience's throats]"? also works) No images, so none to review. No QPQ required. Congratulations, pass. Bremps... 17:23, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Samar Abu Elouf

  • ... that Palestinian photojournalist Samar Abu Elouf once improvised protective gear from a cooking pot while documenting a protest?
Created by Richard Nevell (talk) and ForsythiaJo (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 12 past nominations.

Richard Nevell (talk) 23:35, 25 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall:  Bait30  Talk 2 me pls? 03:11, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hazel Vincent Wallace

  • Source: Times obituary subhead reads "Indomitable spirit who with the backing of Dame Sybil Thorndike became the first woman to build a new theatre in Britain." https://archive.is/JgL6t

Two 1969 sources from when the theatre opened, which are in the British Newspaper Archive (paywalled) https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/viewer/BL/0000560/19690917/140/0017

https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/viewer/BL/0001180/19690807/138/0015
    • ALT1: ... that in 1969 actor-manager Hazel Vincent Wallace became the first woman to build a theatre in Britain? Source: as per first suggestion
    • Reviewed:
Created by EEHalli (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

EEHalli (talk) 20:11, 22 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: None required.

Overall: Article is new, long enough, and well sourced. WP:DAILYMIRROR is no consensus for reliability, but an uncontroversial article from 1969 seems safe enough. The hook is an exceptional claim but it seems to be well supported by reliable sources, and it is interesting. qpq is not required because the nominator has less than 5 previous noms. BuySomeApples (talk) 10:26, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hal Hanson (American football, born 1905)

University of Minnesota star football guard Harold Hanson
University of Minnesota star football guard Harold Hanson
  • ... that Hal Hanson (pictured) "made brave men wince"?
  • Source: here: "There was a shattering quality in his blocking and tackling which made brave men wince.")
5x expanded by Cbl62 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 382 past nominations.

Cbl62 (talk) 23:51, 20 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]


General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems

Hook eligibility:

  • Cited: Yes
  • Interesting: Yes
  • Other problems: Yes
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: Done.

Overall: I'm not a huge fan of quotes that are not WP:INTEXT attributed in the hook, but I accept that this is a DYK norm. Re: the image, considering the hook, he's more strapping in the uncropped version. —Bagumba (talk) 08:18, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tan Jin Sing

  • ... that Tan Jin Sing was "no longer a Chinese, not yet a Dutchman, a half-baked Javanese"? Source: Carey, P. B. R. (2015). The Power of Prophecy: Prince Dipanagara and the End of an Old Order in Java, 1785-1855. p. 400.
Moved to mainspace by Juxlos (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 252 past nominations.

Juxlos (talk) 07:38, 18 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Article is new and long enough, cites multiple sources. Spot checks indicate good neutrality and a clear structure. Negligible similarity with sources. Article is balanced, no excessive editorializing. Nice job! Regards, Jeromi Mikhael 20:06, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Food House

  • Reviewed:
Improved to Good Article status by Averageuntitleduser (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

Averageuntitleduser (talk) 14:02, 18 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: None required.

Overall: Looks good. Nice work. No QPQ required as the nominator has under five nominations. @Averageuntitleduser: The original hook is fine, though, reading the article, this struck me as a potential option as well: ALT1 ... that music by Food House has been described as "3OH!3, SpongeBob SquarePants, Nicki Minaj, metal, and original Twitter put into a musical blender by the Joker"? Let me know if you like that or if we should just go with the original hook. BeanieFan11 (talk) 20:30, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@BeanieFan11: Thanks. I like both but slightly prefer the alt1 hook you suggested, which is more punchy. Averageuntitleduser (talk) 20:48, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
OK, given that I suggested it, I think we'll need another user to approve that one. BeanieFan11 (talk) 20:50, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Articles created/expanded on April 19

[edit]

Bergebyløpet N70

A Bergebyløpet N70 musher
A Bergebyløpet N70 musher
Created by Annwfwn (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 13 past nominations.

Annwfwn (talk) 13:24, 22 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Article looks good. My only concern is that it seems the only citation for the claim is from the website of the organization itself. Are there any independent sources that mention this? BeanieFan11 (talk) 00:27, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, here's three news articles that could also be used to cite the hook:

Thanks! Annwfwn (talk)

pinging @BeanieFan11: Annwfwn (talk) 00:43, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oops, sorry for missing this. Taking a look, it does appear to be verified, so BeanieFan11 (talk) 00:45, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Leo Franciosi

5x expanded by BeanieFan11 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 341 past nominations.

BeanieFan11 (talk) 23:53, 26 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Article was recently expanded and meets the 5x expansion requirement. No apparent issues such as copyright concerns, though the format of the sources makes it hard to confirm the whole article with Earwig. The LA Times clipping was a bit blurry as I can't get access to Newspapers.com, but I think I was able to find mention of the hook facts in that article (pg 19) and the Olympedia source. I wouldn't normally find this aspect of an athlete's career interesting enough for DYK, but the cheeky wording makes it in this case. Thank you for expanding this. Best, Bridget (talk) 01:52, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Jean-Mohammed Abd-el-Jalil

  • ... that Jean-Mohammed Abd-el-Jalil, a Moroccan Franciscan friar, was permitted by the Pope to keep Muhammad as his baptismal name and had Quran verses on his priestly ordination card?
  • Source: Basetti-Sani, Giulio; Verderio, Matteo (2005). Musulmano e Cristiano: La storia del francescano Giovanni-Maometto. Milan: Ancora. p. 54. ISBN 8851402957. "Il papa [Pius XI], come ispirato da Dio, seppe darmi una risposta che merita davvero di essere considerata provvidenziale, oltre che importantissima per tutti coloro che desiderino convertirsi dall'islam alla fede cristiana: « [...] E noi vi autorizziamo a mantenere anche da cristiano il nome di Muhammad. »
Massignon, Louis; Abd-el-Jalil, Jean-Mohammed; Jacquin, Françoise; Borrmans, Maurice (2007). Massignon - Abd-el-Jalil: parrain et filleul, 1926-1962. Paris: Éditions du Cerf. p. 110
    • Reviewed:
    • Comment: If the page number is needed for the second fact I will supply it—on that, would scanning the picture in the book of said card (from 1935) be fair use?
5x expanded by M.A.Spinn (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

M.A.Spinn (talk) 02:42, 20 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]

  • Article is new enough, long enough, appropriated sourced, and clear of copyright issues. The hook is fascinating, cited in the article (AGF on a portion of the verification), and short enough. A promoter can use their discretion to remove the second half of the hook if the length is too much. Otherwise, good to go—nice job! ~ Pbritti (talk) 16:28, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Swamp rabbit

Sylvilagus aquaticus
Sylvilagus aquaticus
  • Source: Schai-Braun, S. C.; Hackländer, K. (2016). "Family Leporidae (Hares and Rabbits)". In Wilson, D.E.; Lacher, T.E.; Mittermeier, R.A. (eds.). Handbook of the Mammals of the World. Vol. 6. Lagomorphs and Rodents I. Barcelona: Lynx Edicions. p. 119. ISBN 978-84-941892-3-4.
Improved to Good Article status by Reconrabbit (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 9 past nominations.

-- Reconrabbit 14:32, 20 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]

  • . Just reviewed this article for GA, so happy on all the content checks. QPQ done. I do not have access to the source, but did do a spot checking for the GA review, so trust it supports the statement. I think it's interesting to say a rabbit is a great swimmer. Maybe less interesting that they're territorial? A shorter DYK might be punchier, but up to you. While a lot of rabbits do it, I still find it interesting that they eat their droppings. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 19:04, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    I guess the cite template that I used doesn't support the quote parameter; it's "One study suggested that males were non-territorial in January-June because home ranges overlapped considerably; otherwise Swamp Rabbits are considered territorial. Swamp Rabbits are excellent swimmers". How about:
  • ALT1: ... that the swamp rabbit (pictured) is a great swimmer?
    -- Reconrabbit 19:41, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Per nom comment. Kingsif (talk) 01:22, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • For clarity, happy with the new hook. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 12:58, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on April 20

[edit]

Lux (Doctor Who)

Moved to mainspace by TheDoctorWho (talk) and Pokelego999 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 12 past nominations.

TheDoctorWho (talk) 05:08, 23 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]

Turns All Year

A popular summer skiing destination
A popular summer skiing destination
Created by Buidhe (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 256 past nominations.

(t · c) buidhe 03:25, 21 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]

  • On reviewing this article- it is new enough, long enough, cites a range of sources (which includes some offline, some blog and startup news pages) which have all published articles on this topic over a period spanning 20 years. The article is neutral, does not need to be BLP-compliant, and appears to be copyvio-free. There is an image on the page which appears appropriate. QPQ credit is listed. I can see no issues with the article. The language from both hooks is from articles in Ski Magazine. Both hooks are interesting, but I prefer the ALT1 hook which is much more specific and this appears appropriate given that the sources are all from one continent. I should note that I have had a long break since my last DYK review. Drchriswilliams (talk) 03:41, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Erotic Probiotic 2

  • Reviewed:
5x expanded by मल्ल (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

मल्ल (talk) 23:27, 20 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation

QPQ: Unknown
Overall: Article 5x expanded. QPQ is not required as nominator has less than 5 nominations. Passes earwig, hook is interesting, cited inline, and verified. Good to go. Toadboy123 (talk) 14:19, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on April 21

[edit]

1990 United States Senate election in Tennessee

5x expanded by OlifanofmrTennant (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 25 past nominations.

Olliefant (she/her) 20:41, 21 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems

Hook eligibility:

  • Cited: Yes
  • Interesting: No - See below
QPQ: Done.

Overall: @OlifanofmrTennant: very nice 5x expansion! The article is sufficiently longer, well-cited, and neutral, leaving my only issues relating to the hooks themselves. The non-striked hooks are all cited (as a courtesy I added a citation for ALT3), but aren't necessarily interesting. I can't see ALT0 mattering to readers outside of the US, ALT1 is true for 90% of non-presidential elections that take place, and ALT3 is kind of the opposite of catchy (who wants to read about a boring election 🙃). If you could revise ALT2 and correct its inaccuracy, or maybe make an ALT4 touching on the fact that 'while the general election wasn't close, Hawkins only won the primary by a narrow margin', those could sound good. If you disagree with my assessment of ALT0, however, I'll pass the DYK for that hook, I just feel like the article has more potential. Thank you again for your contributions, and cheers! Johnson524 08:16, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think if the concern with Alt0 is being to America-centric then the primary thing won’t be work either because AFAIK other countries don’t have primary systems that same issue. I do belive I may be able to reword alt2 into something but I’ll do some digging for more facts. Olliefant (she/her) 16:05, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
A reworked ALT2 could be:

Also a possible option could be

Apologies if you feel these also don't meet DYKINT it was quite a boring campaign. Olliefant (she/her) 04:00, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Approving ALT0, ALT2a, and ALT4, with a preference towards ALT2a and ALT4. I actually quite like these new hooks! Thank you again for your contributions, and cheers from North Carolina 🙂 Johnson524 05:06, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Night

  • ... that one night on the planet Venus lasts just over 58 full days on Earth?
  • Source: "Venus, Backwards Rotation and Orbital Period". Royal Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy. n.d. Retrieved 22 April 2025. This means a little more than 2 complete solar days in one sidereal day! Venusian days and nights last almost 2 terrestrial months (58d 9h).
Improved to Good Article status by Rjjiii (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 11 past nominations.

Rjjiii (talk) 06:02, 22 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]

Policy compliance:

Hook eligibility:

  • Cited: Yes
  • Interesting: Yes
  • Other problems: Yes
QPQ: Done.

Overall: New (promoted to GA on April 20), long enough, well sourced and neutral, free from plagiarism. Hook is cited and interesting.

Though one question, your QPQ is way back in July 2024, did you have a backlog of reviews? Pinging @Rjjiii: for answers Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 14:59, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Miminity: I thought that "QPQs do not expire and may be used at any time for a future DYK nomination. (WP:QPQ)", but if the age is a concern, I can do another one. Rjjiii (talk) 17:31, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Okay. Thank You Good To Go! Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 22:18, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tornadoes in Chicago

  • Source: Synthesis of sources inside the article - strike if not acceptable
  • ALT1: ... that the sound of warning sirens in the city has been described as creepier than a tornado in Chicago? Source: This - it's a student newspaper, but I think it'll work
  • ALT2: ... that an 1876 Chicago Tribune article lamented the fact that a tornado in downtown Chicago "could not have been caught and pickled for scientific investigation"? Source: "Saturday's tornado. Where it came from, how it looked, and what it did", Chicago Tribune, 1876
  • ALT3: ... that Ted Fujita suggested that tornadoes in Chicago could not be ruled out, saying "[a] large, violent tornado might manage to smash through the Loop, damaging skyscrapers"? Source: Tornado patterns perplexing - Chicago Tribune, 1990
  • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Swen Swenson (politician)
  • Comment: Today is the 58th anniversary of the Oak Lawn tornado, the deadliest Chicago-area tornado, so I moved the page to mainspace today. I like ALT2 the most.
Moved to mainspace by Departure– (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 9 past nominations.

Departure– (talk) 20:38, 21 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]

  • Good to go for DYK. Article was moved to mainspace on April 21, so new enough. Article is comprehensive and definitely long enough. Article is well-sourced, with Earwig assessing a copyvio as unlikely (highest match is 9.1%). The article is presentable, the hooks are properly cited and interesting. QPQ has been completed. ALT1 is my preference here, but promoter may find issue with that particular hook being cited to a student newspaper. I think it should be fine (it's a student newspaper from School of the Art Institute of Chicago, which seems like a uniquely apt source for this specific article, as opposed to some totally unrelated or undue source); but I'll defer to the promoter. I think ALT1 could be also tweaked a bit, to make it have a smoother (in my opinion) flow; something like, (ALT1b): that the sound of tornado warning sirens in Chicago has been described as creepier than the actual tornadoes?
If ALT1 is not fine, I'd go with ALT0. This doesn't have an impact on this article's DYK candidacy, but suggestion/question for the article's list of tornadoes: why is the date column 4th and not 2nd? Currently, the event column is 2nd but there are quite a few (essentially) N/As in that column. Think this may be just a preference thing, and definitely not a make-or-break issue for the list at all. Soulbust (talk) 09:28, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Soulbust: Yeah, my main problem with ALT1 was that there isn't a way to phrase it in a way that isn't awkward. ALT0 is synth-y as well. What's your opinion on ALT2? The source is available online in the Chicago Tribune archives, or in a book by Grazulis (pinging @WeatherWriter: who has the book to verify - thank you in advance if you choose to verify!).
As for the table, it's not easy to fix now that I made the table (easily spent 5 hours getting sources and writing the summaries for secondary prose) and I don't know if there's a tool to automatically swap two columns on a table over 100 entries. As of now, I still don't know if I missed any and some of the entries are half-baked but it's presentable enough. Standard practice on other tornado list articles is rating, location, county, state, coordinates, timestamp, path length, and width (see List of United States tornadoes in April 2025 for an example) - the nature of this table made me drop location to add to the summary, drop state and coordinates (as most don't have coordinates), and that led to a few issues early on that aren't the easiest to reverse. Departure– (talk) 14:44, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I can verify Alt2 comes from Grazulis’ book 1680–1991 Significant Tornadoes. The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 21:14, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Soulbust: Do you mind taking a second look at this before this gets promoted? Departure– (talk) 14:36, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hey sorry, I missed the ping for some reason on your initial reply from last week or so. ALT2 is nice. I don't think the ALT1b suggestion I made is too clunky, though I would defer to the promoter on that and if they can make a truly smooth/non-clunky reading of it then that would still be my pick to promote, but ALT2 is quite nice definitely and would go with that one if the promoter has any issue with the wording on ALT1. Also no worries on the table, I understand it would be quite the time-consuming endeavor to adjust it (not even "fix" it, as there's not anything actually wrong with it). Soulbust (talk) 14:46, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe something like:

Feel free to cross it out if not interested, Rjjiii (talk) 20:42, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • That could work. The main reason I oppose this was that the source has one foot in unreliability - having it in the article is one thing but backing up a hook is another. I'm going to bring this to WT:DYK because this is a good hook either way. Departure– (talk) 23:59, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Walter Ben Hare

  • ... that while dramatist Walter Ben Hare's plays were rarely performed professionally, his work as a playwright made him wealthy?
  • Source: "Dead Man Identified as Rich Playwright". St. Louis Globe-Democrat. July 4, 1950. p. 3. Quote- "Walter Ben Hare, a meteorologist who became wealthy from his stage plays that were seldom produced professionally."
Created by 4meter4 (talk) and FloridaArmy (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 112 past nominations.

4meter4 (talk) 16:06, 25 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Epicgenius (talk) 20:36, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Formosa Chang

  • ... that the Taiwanese restaurant chain Formosa Chang drew inspiration from McDonald's for its non-greasy atmosphere and corporate practices?
  • Source:
  1. Teng, Sue-feng 滕淑芬 (December 2010). "The Night-Market Money Tree". Taiwan Panorama. Translated by Williams, Scott. Archived from the original on 2025-04-21. Retrieved 2025-04-21.

    The article notes: "In his efforts to transform stewed minced pork over rice into a signature Taiwanese snack, Chang studied the operations of fast-food leader McDonald's closely. He came away deeply impressed by the industry giant's ability to run eateries that didn't have a greasy feel."

  2. "「鬍鬚張」超過一甲子老味道 從路邊攤起家成為連鎖企業" [「Formosa Chang」 Over 60 Years of Tradition: From a Roadside Stall to a Chain Business]. United Daily News (in Chinese). 2024-06-25. Archived from the original on 2025-04-21. Retrieved 2025-04-21.

    The article notes: "1984年,麥當勞進軍台灣市場,為本土餐飲業帶來衝擊。張炎泉之子張永昌受此啟發,決心將家族事業現代化。他積極引進企業管理模式。1987年,「鬍鬚張速食有限公司」正式成立在北台灣各地開設分店。儘管在90年代,曾因口蹄疫受到影響,鬍鬚張仍是屹立不搖,持續在台紮根。"

    From Google Translate: "In 1984, McDonald's entered the Taiwanese market, bringing an impact to the local catering industry. Inspired by this, Chang Yan-chuan's son Chang Yung-chang decided to modernise the family business. He actively introduced corporate management models. In 1987, "Formosa Chang Fast Food Co., Ltd." was officially established and opened branches throughout northern Taiwan. Although affected by foot-and-mouth disease in the 1990s, Formosa Chang still stands firm and continues to take root in Taiwan."

Created by Cunard (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 91 past nominations.

Cunard (talk) 23:14, 21 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]

  • Comments by Tbhotch

General eligibility:

Policy compliance:

Hook eligibility:

  • Cited: Yes
  • Interesting: Yes
  • Other problems: Yes
QPQ: Done.

Overall: A new article that is long enough. The article is well sourced and neutral. There are no copyvios; Chinese text was adapted accordingly and match the citation content. I assume good faith in offline sources. The hook is interesting. QPQ done. (CC) Tbhotch 06:25, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wanderstop

  • Reviewed:
Improved to Good Article status by BarntToust (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

BarntToust 00:05, 22 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]

  • Article is very impressive - passed GA yesterday so size/timing is no issue. Earwig shows up above 20% but basically all of it is either proper nouns or direct quotes so I'm not concerned about that. Sourcing looks solid as well and the hook fact is present in the article and cited. This is the 4th DYK nom by this user so no QPQ required. I will admit that it took me a couple of read-overs to understand what was meant by the hook (I presume it's "he spent so long working on a cozy game that the mere mention of the phrase 'cozy game' is irritating" or the like); perhaps amending slightly to give it a touch more context (either pointing out what the developer meant by this quote or pointing out that Wanderstop is a cozy game, or a combination of the two - could be beneficial. All in all this is really nice work and I'll be happy to pass with that minor concern addressed. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 20:09, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Alt1:

@User:PCN02WPS: Much of what Wanderstop director Davey Wreden has said in other interviews has impressed that cozy games have become a very saturated market in recent years, more so than when he began developing the game [10]. Wreden's line in the The Verge article is rather ambiguous, but I felt that it had oomph to it, considering that the game took an extended development time. BarntToust 20:56, 22 April 2025 (UTC) Alternatively, here's something about women and jiu-jitsu if this one works best.[reply]

Alt2:

  • ... that Wanderstop's story editor spoke with women practitioners of jiu-jitsu to inform the characterization of the player character?

BarntToust 21:01, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kitty Marion

Note on the image: I'm not certain how to set the size/width to conform to DYK requirements.

Improved to Good Article status by Noleander (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

Noleander (talk) 18:18, 21 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]

  • Article is a recent GA. Referencing is adequate. QPQ is provided but not completed, but it is not needed anyway. Copyvio has a fairly high score from a somewhat long quote, but it's good enough. I cannot access the specific sources used inline on the article, but a spot check on other sources online verifies. Hook interesting, so good to go. Juxlos (talk) 08:14, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
RoySmith (talk) 23:28, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@RoySmith: Agree the headshot photo is better. I changed it above. If I'm not permitted to do that, or if the size needs to be adjusted, go ahead. Noleander (talk) 00:10, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Morton D. Magoffin

  • ... that fighter pilot Morton D. Magoffin made pilots in his group to sprint around an airfield for not saluting him?
Created by Toadboy123 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 52 past nominations.

Toadboy123 (talk) 08:28, 21 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Article and hook look mostly good. There appears to be some copying in the paragraph starting On July 13, 1944, – is that public domain or no? If not, it needs to be redone. Secondly, awaiting a QPQ. BeanieFan11 (talk) 13:48, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Steve's Lava Chicken

Converted from a redirect by NegativeMP1 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 292 past nominations.

Launchballer 00:44, 21 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Article looks good and hook is interesting. Approving. BeanieFan11 (talk) 14:16, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on April 22

[edit]

Miles Turpin

  • ... that NFL player Miles Turpin wrestled alligators when young, calling it "a lot of fun"?
Improved to Good Article status by BeanieFan11 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 343 past nominations.

BeanieFan11 (talk) 22:25, 27 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]

  • Articles is new enough and long enough, well sourced, BLP compliant and found no evidence of copyvios. Hook is sinteresting, hort enough and reliably sourced. QPQ done. Rlendog (talk) 00:13, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Shangi

  • Source: Des Forges, Alison (2011). Defeat Is the Only Bad News: Rwanda under Musinga, 1896–1931. Madison, Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin Press, p. 15: "The Rwandans attacked twice more before Sandrart killed Bisangwa with a bullet through the head and thus dispersed the Rwandan troops."
Created by Applodion (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 66 past nominations.

Applodion (talk) 20:02, 28 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]

Dustin McDonald

  • ... that NFL player Dustin McDonald was later a labor leader who led strikes and was jailed for fighting the police?
Improved to Good Article status by BeanieFan11 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 342 past nominations.

BeanieFan11 (talk) 22:21, 27 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Everything seems to check out here, short and sweet article, no problems in sources, neutrality, or copy violations. The hook is interesting in its current state, however, similar to another recent DYKN I reviewed, I do think it would make it slightly more interesting to trim it slightly:

  • ALT1 ... that NFL player Dustin McDonald was once jailed for fighting the police?

It's not unusual for labor leaders to be arrested in a similar fashion, but this leaves a little more mystery behind it. Regardless of which hook is used, this just needs a QPQ before I officially approve it. I have this on my watchlist, but drop me a {{ping}} when you add it just in case. TheDoctorWho (talk) 04:51, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Mount!

Created by Lajmmoore (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 134 past nominations.

Lajmmoore (talk) 18:43, 22 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]

  • Article was moved to the mainspace on April 22 and nominated shortly after. It's long enough and well sourced. No issues with plagiarism. The hook is interesting, under 200 characters, and sourced. QPQ has been provided. Good to go! Sebbirrrr (talk) 17:58, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Flag of Lincoln, Nebraska

The flag of Lincoln, Nebraska
The flag of Lincoln, Nebraska
  • ... that the creator of Lincoln, Nebraska's flag (pictured) cites the city's skyline as an inspiration for his flag design?
“I began the process of designing a submission for Lincoln’s next city flag by reflecting on the emotions I felt when I drove into town the first time”, said Mejia. “Lincoln rises up out of the horizon, beaming with a sense of hope and optimism that is shared by both lifelong residents and recent refugees.”
Moved to mainspace by Hurstbergn (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

Hurstbergn (talk) 01:45, 23 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation

QPQ: Unknown
Overall: Moved to mainspace. QPQ is not required as nominator has less than 5 nominations. Clears Earwig check, hook is engaging, properly cited inline, and confirmed accurate. Ready to proceed. Toadboy123 (talk) 14:39, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Drymaeus poecilus

  • ... that the land snail Drymaeus poecilus is notable for the striking variety of colors and patterns on its shell?
"This species is extremely variable in colour pattern, as the vast type series shows (NHMUK 1854.12.4.152–157, 53 paralectotypes), with some slight variation in shell shape also occurring (Bonnet, 1864; Pilsbry, 1897; Breure & Ablett, 2014)."
    • Reviewed:
Improved to Good Article status by Daniel Cavallari (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

Daniel Cavallari (talk) 13:41, 23 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: None required.

Overall: Article promoted to GA on April 22, 2025. Ready to go. — ERcheck (talk) 22:57, 23 April 2025 (UTC) [reply]

Any Austin

  • Reviewed:
Created by Based5290 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

Based5290 :3 (talk) 04:18, 23 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]

Policy compliance:

Hook eligibility:

  • Cited: Yes
  • Interesting: Yes
  • Other problems: Yes
QPQ: Done.

Overall: This article is new enough (created just a day before). Long enough (1578 characters (267 words)), Well-sourced, Neutral in tone. 4.8% in Earwig. Hook is cited and in the article. QPQ is not needed as nom as less than 5 noms. Good to Go!. Good to see that this guy has an article now. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 04:38, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment I personally think it is dubious that he would pass WP:NYOUTUBER. He does have a lot of trivial mentions, but all of the sources used are about the particular thing he has found, and mention him as the discoverer in passing. He is not the developer of Skyrim, so it would only point to Skyrim itself being notable. In terms of significant coverage about him the person, there is next to nil. The Polygon article is the closest, but it's an interview and primary source, not a secondary one. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ () 13:48, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    • The sources are more in line with "Any Austin found X" rather than "X was found", and coverage of the actions that a person does is evidence of notability for that person (or rather, a YouTube channel in this case). Based5290 :3 (talk) 17:58, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tarmidi Suhardjo

Created by Juxlos (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 253 past nominations.

Juxlos (talk) 08:08, 22 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]

Articles created/expanded on April 23

[edit]

Hester Leggatt

  • Source: Source: Ben Macintyre's book Operation Mincemeat (https://archive.org/details/operationminceme0000maci) (p 77) "Hester Leggett was certainly fierce and demanding. She never married, and she devoted herself utterly to the job of marshalling a huge quantity of secret paperwork. But into Pam’s love letters, she poured every ounce of pathos and emotion she could muster. These letters may have been the closest Hester Leggett ever came to romance: chattering pastiches of a young woman madly in love, and with little time for grammar." (p 78) "As the official report on Operation Mincemeat acknowledged, Hester Leggett’s effort ‘achieved the thrill and pathos of a war engagement with great success’."
  • ALT1: ... that fans of the musical Operation Mincemeat helped uncover the real-life contributions of MI5 secretary Hester Leggatt to the WWII deception operation of the same name? Source: Source: The Times article by Ben Macintyre titled "How musical fans forced MI5 to come clean" (https://www.thetimes.com/culture/books/article/how-musical-fans-forced-mi5-to-come-clean-0xsnrvwvz?region=global) Quote: "Musical theatre spawns a peculiarly obsessive fan base and this is particularly true of Operation Mincemeat: some have seen the show dozens of times, others dress up in costume and a few dive deep into the history. Hester plays a key role in the musical and a group of diehard fans, calling themselves “The Mincefluencers”, set out to track her down. Starting last June, they (“they” include teachers, solicitors, people in cybersecurity and Big Tech, a cancer research scientist, someone in the ambulance service, a barrister plus — as you’d expect — authors and creatives) began scouring the National Archives at Kew and the Imperial War Museum, conducting open-source investigations, attempting to locate potential relatives and pooling their research on a private server. They used the hashtag #FindingHester. They wrote to MI5, asking for confirmation that she had worked in the wartime security services. Gradually, the real woman took shape. It seemed that Hester was not Leggett, which was how Jean had spelt her name to me, but Hester May Murray Leggatt, with an “a”. She was born in India in 1905, to a family with a tradition of military service, attended Tormead and Wycombe Abbey schools, and played the piano. Surviving samples of her handwriting appear to match that of the “Pam” letters."
  • Reviewed:
Created by Engrigg22 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

Engrigg22 (talk) 22:20, 29 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]

  • This is a really well written and needed article, well done! Sourcing and earwig don't show any issues and QPQ isn't needed. I think either hook is fine but I prefer hook #1. I think the "despite never marrying herself" could be removed but I am not fussed if it stays. This is good to go, well done! DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 20:36, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Chill Guy

A wood carving of the Chill Guy meme
A wood carving of the Chill Guy meme
Improved to Good Article status by Johnson524 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 27 past nominations.

Johnson524 08:19, 27 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]

  • Article was recently promoted to GA status, has no copyright issues or any other issues and is well-sourced. QPQ has been done so it is good to go. I think that the first hook is the best, but perhaps slightly too long - perhaps "reached a half-billion dollar market cap," could be cut from the sentence? But it is not a big deal either way. Well done on the article! :) This DYK is good to go DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 17:20, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    • Actually, after reading the source again, I am a bit confused by the "was promoted by the President of El Salvador" - the source seems to say that the meme was shared by the president, whereas the hook suggests that the president actively promoted the cryptocurrency rather than the meme. Could the hook be edited? DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 17:25, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
      • @DaniloDaysOfOurLives: Thank you for the review and kind words! 🙂 I am a little confused on your reasoning though, as by promoting the coin he by extension promoted the meme by posted the picture of Chill Guy to all of his followers? If you don't believe this does, however, how would you recommend rephrasing it? Cheers! Johnson524 18:04, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
      • Further information: the source shows that his tweet solely consisted of "an image of the Chill Guy in a grassy field for some reason and without comment." So it was more so people assuming he was promoting the coin (which he was), but all he really did was just post a picture of the meme with no comment, which I still feel like is promotion. Johnson524 18:07, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
      • I understand your reasoning and I agree. Hence, it should not be changed, and the hook is good to go ! :D Well done! DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 18:11, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Homo rodans

Homo rodans
Homo rodans
Moved to mainspace by Sawyer777 (talk) and D Kirlston (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 6 past nominations.

... sawyer * any/all * talk 15:52, 25 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]

  • Length, date, hook, close paraphrase check ok. QPQ done. Image free on Commons, and by my reading should be ok in line with Commons:Public art and copyrights in the US. --Soman (talk) 15:04, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hwanhaejangseong

Created by Chipmunkdavis (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 56 past nominations.

CMD (talk) 13:18, 24 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Epicgenius (talk) 20:34, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tackle!

Created by Lajmmoore (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 135 past nominations.

Lajmmoore (talk) 18:54, 23 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems

Hook eligibility:

  • Cited: Yes
  • Interesting: Yes
  • Other problems: No - Unfortunately, ALT1 fails WP:DYKFICTION ("If the subject of the hook is a creative work, the hook must be focused on a real-world fact"), since Glittoris is presented in the article as a fictional substance.
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Nice work on this article. ALT0 is good to go, but since ALT1 fails DYKFICTION, I've stricken it. Epicgenius (talk) 20:24, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

John C. Raaen Jr.

  • Source: "..Raaen participated in the initial assault onto Omaha Beach, Normandy, France. For his bravery and actions he received the Silver Star."AHOF Hall of Fame
5x expanded by ERcheck (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 6 past nominations.

ERcheck (talk) 23:02, 23 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]

General eligibility:

Policy compliance:

Hook eligibility:

  • Cited: Yes
  • Interesting: Yes
  • Other problems: Yes
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Good to go with Main or ALT1. Although ALT2 is a much better hook, the source says that he is the last survivor of the first wave on Omaha Beach, so stricken Hawkeye7 (discuss) 19:21, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • What a great idea! Posting it on June 6, 2025, 81 years after his landing at Omaha Beach, would be nice. If not June 6, then May 26, 2025 (Memorial Day USA, honoring those who gave their lives in service to the country. While Raaem is a survivor, approximately 777 American were KIA/MIA on Omaha Beach). — ERcheck (talk) 22:24, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Taraxacum mongolicum

Taraxacum mongolicum flower in bloom
Taraxacum mongolicum flower in bloom
Created by MallardTV (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

MallardTV Talk to me! 00:58, 24 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]

  • Let's see:
New
created on April 23rd, 2025.
Long enough
way over 1,500 characters.
Cited hook
It's there, and it's referenced.
Within policy
No problems here.
Review requirement (QPQ)
Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

Everything seems good. Daniel Cavallari (talk) 17:55, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on April 24

[edit]

Elizabeth Ellis Hoyt

  • ... that economist Elizabeth Ellis Hoyt has a library in Paradise View, South Africa, named after her in recognition of her work in Africa?
Created by CaptainAngus (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 8 past nominations.

CaptainAngus (talk) 22:18, 26 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems

Hook eligibility:

  • Cited: Yes
  • Interesting: Yes
  • Other problems: Yes
QPQ: Done.

Overall: The Works section needs to be cited. CaptainAngus SL93 (talk) 01:30, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@SL93: Citations added, thank you! CaptainAngus (talk) 00:44, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. This is ready. SL93 (talk) 21:51, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Auldbrass Plantation

Old Brass plantation house
Old Brass plantation house
5x expanded by Epicgenius (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 718 past nominations.

Epicgenius (talk) 15:13, 24 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]

Policy compliance:

Hook eligibility:

  • Cited: Yes
  • Interesting: Yes
  • Other problems: Yes
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: Done.

Overall: @Epicgenius: Everything looks to be in order. I would suggest that ALT1 be used as ALT0 sounds a bit generic (all artists have said something like that at some point). I see no major problems with the article. Jon698 (talk) 23:07, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dimitar Agura

Agura in 1892
Agura in 1892
  • ... that Bulgarian historian Dimitar Agura (pictured) returned to Romania for an anniversary in 1911, whereupon he died in the same room where he had spent his youth in the 1870s?
  • Source: "†Dimitrie Agura", in Opinia, 4 October 1911, p. 1: Fericit că a putut revedea Iaşul, că-i a putut aduce, la bătrîneţe, prisosul său de recunoştinţă—Agura—minat de o boală ucigătoare—se stinge în oraşul seu iubit, moare, deştept profesor de Universitate, barbat de stat apreciat în ţara sa, moare în aceeaşi odaie în care locuise, ca pedagog al Institutului Academic, în oraşul seu adoptiv de altă dată. ("Content at having revisited Iași, to have been able to express, in his old age, his debt of gratitude to it, Agura—sapped by some deadly disease—has now expired in beloved city, as a smart University professor, as a statesman well-liked by his country [of Bulgaria], in the same room where he had lived, as a teacher of the Academic Institute, in what was once his adoptive city.")
5x expanded by Dahn (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 114 past nominations.

Dahn (talk) 12:59, 29 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
  • Cited: Yes - Offline/paywalled citation accepted in good faith
  • Interesting: Yes
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Article looks good. Nice work. AGF on the offline sources. Appears good to go. BeanieFan11 (talk) 20:28, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Luther H. Richmond

Created by Toadboy123 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 53 past nominations.

Toadboy123 (talk) 14:20, 24 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]

Policy compliance:

Hook eligibility:

  • Cited: Yes
  • Interesting: Yes
  • Other problems: Yes
QPQ: Done.

Overall: @Toadboy123: Pretty interesting hook about a piece of aerial warfare history. Everything is sourced and I cannot find any grammatical or spelling mistakes. QPQ is met. Jon698 (talk) 17:50, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

El Apóstol

  • ... that El Apóstol is the first animated feature film?
Improved to Good Article status by Lazman321 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 17 past nominations.

Lazman321 (talk) 17:57, 28 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]

Policy compliance:

Hook eligibility:

  • Cited: Yes
  • Interesting: Yes
  • Other problems: Yes
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Recently promoted to GA, hook is cited and interesting, no other issues, qpq is done.

I think there is a copyvio here, the plot is verbatim copy of [12]. Copyvio report here. Kindly explain this and possibly rewrite the plot. Pinging @Lazman321: for answer. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 08:38, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Miminity: Actually, Letterboxd is the one plagiarizing Wikipedia. Letterboxd uses data from TMDB for its entries, and TMDB is user-generated, with each entry having its own edit history. Comparing the entry's edit histories between Wikipedia and TMDB, the plagiarism becomes obvious, as Wikipedia's plot section took on its modern form in November 2020, with a copyedit in January 2021, while the plot was added to TMDB in January 2025 (can't link because the site is blacklisted), which was, in turn, carried over to Letterboxd.
Okay - Approving Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 00:30, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I Don't Wanna Live Forever

Improved to Good Article status by Ippantekina (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 13 past nominations.

Ippantekina (talk) 12:24, 24 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]

Sašo Bertoncelj

Bertoncelj at the 2015 European Games
Bertoncelj at the 2015 European Games
5x expanded by Riley1012 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 39 past nominations.

Riley1012 (talk) 21:16, 24 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]

Articles created/expanded on April 25

[edit]

Greg Jensen

  • ... that Greg Jensen played in the NFL after he watched a game on television and thought "I can do that"?
5x expanded by BeanieFan11 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 352 past nominations.

BeanieFan11 (talk) 22:22, 2 May 2025 (UTC).[reply]

  • Promoted to GA status on April 28 and nominated here 4 days later. The article is long enough, well-sourced, and there are no issues with copyright. All hooks are sourced within the article and under the character limit. I think that ALT2 is the best hook. QPQ has been provided. Good to go! Sebbirrrr (talk) 21:18, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Mickey Volcan

5x expanded by HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 86 past nominations.

HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 04:28, 25 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Interesting. Article looks good, nice work. Just awaiting QPQ. BeanieFan11 (talk) 22:44, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@HickoryOughtShirt?4: QPQs are now required at the time of the nomination and noms can be closed without warning if a QPQ is not provided. The nomination will be closed within 24 hours if no QPQ is given within that timeframe. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 01:52, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Narutolovehinata5 and BeanieFan11: my apologies, I was unaware. I have completed my QPQ. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 02:54, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
BeanieFan11 (talk) 15:44, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Fear and trembling (biblical phrase)

  • ... that the scriptural phrase "fear and trembling" has been used to celebrate hospitality, explore the nature of faith, and justify slavery?
  • Source: Berger, Klaus (2003) [1991]. Identity and Experience in the New Testament. Translated by Muenchow, Charles. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press. p. 139. ISBN 1-4514-1259-2. (hospitality; of the Corinthians to Titus); Carlisle, Claire (2010). Kierkegaard's Fear and Trembling: A Reader's Guide. London: Bloomsbury Academic. p. 3. ISBN 978-1-84706-461-5. (explore the nature of faith; by Kirkegaard); Schipper, Jeremy (2022). Denmark Vesey's Bible: The Thwarted Revolt that Put Slavery and Scripture on Trial. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press. p. 71. ISBN 978-0-691-19286-4. (justify slavery, by Lionel H. Kennedy)
  • ALT1: ... that a Biblical verse about "fear and trembling" was used both to support and to oppose American slavery? Source: Schipper, Jeremy (2022). Denmark Vesey's Bible: The Thwarted Revolt that Put Slavery and Scripture on Trial. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press. p. 71. ISBN 978-0-691-19286-4.; Harrill, J. Albert (2000). "The Use of the New Testament in the American Slave Controversy: A Case History in the Hermeneutical Tension between Biblical Criticism and Christian Moral Debate". Religion and American Culture: A Journal of Interpretation. 10 (2): 155. JSTOR 1123945.
  • ALT2: ... that Paul the Apostle described his nerves about public speaking with a phrase commonly used in Jewish literature to describe the fear of seeing the acts of God? Source: Bockmuehl, Markus (2006). The Epistle to the Philippians. London: Bloomsbury Academic. p. 153. ISBN 0-8264-8107-8. (use in Jewish literature); Ciampa, Roy E.; Rosner, Brian S. (2020). The First Letter to the Corinthians. The Pillar New Testament Commentary. Lisle, IL: Inter-Varsity Press. ISBN 978-1-78974-014-1. (use by Paul)
  • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Voluta ebraea
Improved to Good Article status by UndercoverClassicist (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 31 past nominations.

UndercoverClassicist T·C 17:43, 25 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Article passed GA on March 25. No copyvio issues. Main hook is interesting and preferred. — ERcheck (talk) 17:38, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Goetsch–Winckler House

The Goetsch–Winckler House
The Goetsch–Winckler House
  • ... that the Frank Lloyd Wright Building Conservancy once bought the Goetsch–Winckler House just two days before it was to be auctioned off? Source: Mack, Linda (January 2, 2005). "'Teardown city': Wrong address for Wright ; A conservancy works to save Frank Lloyd Wright houses from demolition". Star Tribune. p. 1F
    • ALT1: ... that a lanai was added to the Goetsch–Winckler House because one of its owners wanted to be secure? Source: Bandes, Susan J. (Fall 1990). "Affordable Dreams: Frank Lloyd Wright and Mid-Michigan". The Frank Lloyd Wright Quarterly. Vol. 1, no. 3. p. 6.
    • ALT2: ... that the Goetsch–Winckler House's owners rehired its architect to design a second house less than a decade after it was completed? Source: Tepfer, Diane (1991). "Alma Goetsch and Kathrine Winckler: Patrons of Frank Lloyd Wright and E. Fay Jones". Woman's Art Journal. 12 (2): 15. p. 16.
    • ALT3: ... that the Goetsch–Winckler House was designed for two members of a co-op that disbanded after failing to obtain construction loans? Source: Sergeant, John (1984). Frank Lloyd Wright's Usonian Houses: The Case for Organic Architecture. Whitney Library of Design. p. 78.
    • ALT4: ... that before the Goetsch–Winckler House was built, more than 50 financial institutions refused to give its owners loans due to its design? Source: Sergeant, John (1984). Frank Lloyd Wright's Usonian Houses: The Case for Organic Architecture. Whitney Library of Design. p. 78. (Technically, the owners were part of a co-op, and the rejected loans were intended to fund all the houses in the co-op, not just this one.)
    • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/SZA
    • Comment: Hook suggestions welcomed
5x expanded by Epicgenius (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 719 past nominations.

Epicgenius (talk) 21:10, 25 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]

  • Approved: Article is long enough, and generally in good shape. It's an old article, but expanded within the window. QPQ is done. I think ALT0 and ALT2 are the best of the hook: ALT1 is pretty opaque, to my reading, and I'm not sure how interesting ALT3 and ALT4 would be to a general audience. If using ALT2, I would be inclined to link Wright on "its architect". Those two hooks are cited and included in the article.
Freedom of Panorama law for buildings in the United States requires that the building be visible from a public place: looking at the map on the page, the images seem to be taken from the house's grounds and driveway, but by the very scientific method of looking on Google Street View, I think we're fine, as the Street View car was able to photograph the house from the road. That question aside, there are no evident copyvio or BLP concerns. UndercoverClassicist T·C 14:04, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the review UC. (With regards to freedom of panorama, the building was completed prior to December 1, 1990, which according to c:COM:FOP US makes the building itself public domain except for the plans, regardless of whether it can be seen from a public place. At least, that's my understanding of the matter.) Epicgenius (talk) 18:15, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yup, looking at that page, I have the same understanding, so the point's moot in any case -- the building is PD for the purposes of photos. UndercoverClassicist T·C 18:27, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Makoto Nishimoto

Nishimoto in 2022
Nishimoto in 2022
  • Source: Asahi Shimbun, "He became a hot topic when he ran under the name Super Crazy-kun in the Tokyo gubernatorial election last July." [昨年7月の都知事選でスーパークレイジー君の名前で活動して話題になった。]
Created by Miminity (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 16 past nominations.

Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 14:59, 25 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Is it just me, or the prose reads a bit too funky? There are too many of them to list them all. Not a fan of one-line sections, either. AlphaBetaGamma (Talk/report any mistakes here) 04:50, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@AlphaBetaGamma: Thanks for the review. I fixed what I can fixed. The "personal life" section is a only that short as it is the only available information. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 06:02, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Good to go then. AlphaBetaGamma (Talk/report any mistakes here) 09:16, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Miss Behave's Mavericks

  • Source: Miller, Ken (2022-08-05). "'Miss Behave's Mavericks' brings variety acts to downtown Las Vegas". Las Vegas Magazine. Greenspun Media Group. Archived from the original on 2025-04-25. Retrieved 2025-04-25.

    The article notes: "What really puts this experience over the top is, well, you. You are strongly encouraged to bring dollar bills along, which you are then strongly encouraged to crumple into tiny balls and throw at any performer you particularly like. It’s like making it rain, only it’s more like hail."

Created by Cunard (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 92 past nominations.

Cunard (talk) 08:20, 25 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]

  • QPQ is done. All DYK criteria check out. No copyright violations detected. Article is new enough, long enough, and cited to reliable sources throughout. The hook fact is interesting and verified to the source with an inline citation. This hook can be promoted.4meter4 (talk) 15:37, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on April 26

[edit]

John Papadimitriou

Improved to Good Article status by UndercoverClassicist (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 32 past nominations.

UndercoverClassicist T·C 14:18, 26 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]

  • I claim this and will review this article either today or on the weekend. WatkynBassett (talk) 17:58, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • The article was promoted to GA on 26 April 2025 and nominated on the same day. It is thus eligible.
  • The article is (very) well-sourced. I did two spot checks and they checked out.
  • The article is written in a neutral and non-promotional tone.
  • QPQ done.
  • Concerning the hooks, I love the second one. It is interesting, sourced and funny. I approve ALT1. Thank you for creating free knowledge, I learned a lot from reading the article. WatkynBassett (talk) 18:42, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Well (Doctor Who)

Moved to mainspace by TheDoctorWho (talk) and Pokelego999 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 13 past nominations.

TheDoctorWho (talk) 05:25, 28 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]

  • Article is neutral, free from copyvio (Earwig shows 49.2% similarity but it's obvious the website copied from Wikipedia, and the phrasing is standard stuff anyway, like producer names), suitably referenced, and meets the length and newness criteria—moved to mainspace on 26 April, within seven days of this nomination. The hooks are interesting, succinct, neutral, and verifiable—I think ALT1 is my preference, but ALT0 may be more appealing for a general audience. Here's a slightly rephrased version of ALT1:
QPQ is done. This is good to go! Rhain (he/him) 22:25, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Blane Smith

  • ... that NFL player Blane Smith, one of 15 children, grew up in a two-room house in conditions like "sardines in a can"?
5x expanded by BeanieFan11 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 351 past nominations.

BeanieFan11 (talk) 22:17, 2 May 2025 (UTC).[reply]


General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Peaceray (talk) 21:16, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Meitetsu Okoshi Line

  • Source: Tokuda, Koichi (2001). 名鉄の廃線跡を歩く (in Japanese). JTB. p.80
Created by AlphaBetaGamma (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 9 past nominations.

AlphaBetaGamma (Talk/report any mistakes here) 05:06, 26 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
  • Cited: Yes - Offline/paywalled citation accepted in good faith
  • Interesting: Yes
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Article looks good. AGF on the offline source. The only issue is that the article currently has no categories. @AlphaBetaGamma: Would you be willing to add some categories to the article and then I can approve? BeanieFan11 (talk) 22:02, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@BeanieFan11: Done. AlphaBetaGamma (Talk/report any mistakes here) 06:34, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
BeanieFan11 (talk) 19:32, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I and my Chimney

  • ... that the chimney in a work by Herman Melville has been described as a "a bastion of phallic, assertive, and aggressive masculinity"?
  • Source: Douglas, Ann (1977). The Feminization of American Culture. Alfred A. Knopf. ISBN 0394405323.
Moved to mainspace by Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 436 past nominations.

SL93 (talk) 00:34, 28 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]

Articles created/expanded on April 27

[edit]

Just Say Yes (Ted)

Scott Grimes
Scott Grimes
  • Reviewed:
Moved to mainspace by Crystal Drawers (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

Crystal Drawers (talk) 23:42, 27 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]

  • New enough and long enough. Nominator is QPQ-exempt. Hook fact is in article and reasonably interesting (needed adjustment in hook presentation as the quote includes brackets from source). Image is appropriately licensed for Main Page use. Good to go. Sammi Brie (she/her · t · c) 20:31, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Brian Satterfield

  • Source: [13] - he quit the Redskins before playing, then worked for UPS, then joined the Packers and played
5x expanded by BeanieFan11 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 355 past nominations.

BeanieFan11 (talk) 22:48, 4 May 2025 (UTC).[reply]

HNLMS De Ruyter (1935)

HNLMS De Ruyter
HNLMS De Ruyter
  • Source: "The most important German naval enterprise established in the Netherlands was the design firm of N.V. Ingenieurskantoor voor Scheepsbouw, or IvS (a front for AG Vulcan Stettin, AG Weser and Germaniawerft), founded in The Hague in 1922. Admiral Paul Behncke, commander of the post-war German Reichsmarine from 1920 to 1924, insisted that German naval design, particularly U-boat design, be continued clandestinely abroad and was the driving force behind the establishment of IvS...The Koninklijke Marine, through the association of its own personnel with these firms, received access to their technical developments while allowing the Reichsmarine and later Kriegsmarine to cover much of the financial investment."
    "DE RUYTER CLASS CRUISER DE RUYTER...The Koninklijke Marine turned to IvS to prepare the design of the new cruiser, intent on taking advantage of the firm’s access to recent German design developments." PG 10, 12, 18, 20 from The Royal Netherlands Navy of World War II by Ryan Noppen
  • ALT1: ... that an essay contest was held to determine the design of HNLMS De Ruyter (pictured)?
  • Source: "A Controversal Cruiser....A prize was offered for the best essay on the best type of cruiser for the Royal Netherlands Navy..."
    PG 75, Profile Warship: Her Netherlands Majesty's Ship De Ruyter by F.C. van Oosten
  • ALT2: ... that the shipwreck of HNLMS De Ruyter (pictured) went missing in 2016, with the wreck's imprint on the ocean floor still visable?
  • Reviewed:
  • Comment: ALT2: While interesting, I listed it last as it could serve as a good hook for an article that would be otherwise unremarkable
Improved to Good Article status by GGOTCC (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

GGOTCC 00:21, 1 May 2025 (UTC).[reply]

  • The article is new enough (GA on 27 April 2025), long enough (15.771 characters), has no copyright issues (per GA review), and is presentable (per readthrough and GA review). QPQ is not required. The image is used in the article and its license seems in order. The first hook is interesting, but seems incorrect because the ship was ordered in 1932, and design started before that, and Nazi Germany was established in 1933. ALT1 is interesting, but also seems incorrect, only objections to an already proposed design emerged through the essay contest, according to the article. Therefore I prefer ALT2, but I noticed that the year 2016 that is not in the article text. From the source that covers the other elements, it is not clear when exactly the discovery was made, so I approve the shorter ALT3 version. – Editør (talk) 09:48, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    • ALT3 ... that the shipwreck of HNLMS De Ruyter (pictured) went missing, leaving only an imprint on the ocean floor?
    • @Editør: Thank you for the response! While I do not object to ALT3, I believe thw main hook is still factual. Ship design does not end when the vessel is laid down; instead, it is a continuous effort until (and even after) she enters service. De Ruyter entered service in 1936, well after IvS was directly influenced by Nazi Germany. Even by the most conservative definitions, only the concept design of De Ruyter was finished when she was ordered in 1932. The Kriegsmarine was founded in 1935, meaning there was a solid year when IvS was funded by the Kriegsmarine as the cruiser was still being worked on. What do you think of this? Best, GGOTCC 02:51, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Looking Glass Girl

Created by DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 9 past nominations.

DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 17:32, 27 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: See below for comments. Rjjiii (talk) 21:13, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • @DaniloDaysOfOurLives: The article looks good. It was moved out of userspace at the end of April. The QPQ is good. The quote from the book's blurb is styled as a MOS:PULLQUOTE, and I don't think it meets WP:NPOV. A few quick solutions that come to mind would be to style it as a regular {{blockquote}}, to select a passage from the book that illustrates something about the writing rather than the promotion blurb (this would still go against MOS:PULLQUOTE but that's not a dealbreaker for DYK), to do both of the previous ideas, or remove the quote. If you have another better idea feel free to try that as well. I think the first hook looks solid. The ALT3ALT2 hook also passes, but do you think it could be phrased to more clearly indicate that it's about 17 libraries in Coventry? ALT1 does not meet WP:DYKHOOKSTYLE. No other issues. All quotes are clear and attributed with citations. {{Ping}} me whenever you're ready for me to take another look, or if you have any questions or concerns, Rjjiii (talk) 21:13, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    • @Rjjiii: Thank you so so much for reviewing the article! I have removed the quote instead and used the ref to support the line about the book's theme. I slightly reworded ALT2 (I assume that's the one you meant), though I think ALT0 may be best. Please let me know if anything else is needed :) DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 23:34, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Aquilegia paui

  • ... that the conservation of a goat might endanger the survival of Aquilegia paui?
Created by Pbritti (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 76 past nominations.

Pbritti (talk) 22:52, 27 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: I'd prefer if the second paragraph were cited, but I suppose some would consider it part of the lede. All statements there are supported in the rest of the body, so not a deal breaker. I'm also curious what the Spanish common name is. ALT1 could be rephrased to be more interesting: Even just saying "mix-up" instead of "mistake" would punch it up. Still interesting enough as is. Likewise ALT0 is good. ALT2 is alright in a pinch. Great job. awkwafaba (📥) 00:46, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Awkwafaba: Thanks for the review—always nice to see a nice and quick one! To clarify, MOS:LEAD explains that the lead is anything preceding the first heading. I generally refrain from citations in leads for plant articles as there's typically little room for controversy, but please let me know if you have specific facts you think ought to be directly verified in the lead! Best, ~ Pbritti (talk) 03:41, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kirkby train crash

The aftermath of the Kirkby train crash
The aftermath of the Kirkby train crash
  • ... that the train driver in the Kirkby train crash (pictured) was found to have been using their mobile phone before the collision?
  • Source: "detectives found he’d sent a WhatsApp message at 6.51.34pm, 26 seconds before the crash" [17]
  • Reviewed: [[]]
Improved to Good Article status by FozzieHey (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

FozzieHey (talk) 20:54, 28 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: None required.

Overall: Article reached Good Article status within 7 days of nomination. Article is more than 1,500 words in prose, sourced, and neutral. There is one source that is only accessible by paid subscription, and for that, I assume good faith. Earwig returned an unlikely violation of 37.9%. Most of what was flagged were names of certain organization and phrases that were not used in the same context as the source. The hook is interesting and sourced. Image is also found in article and is license-free. A QPQ is not needed at this time as the nominator has less than 5 nominations. lullabying (talk) 05:20, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • @FozzieHey and Lullabying: wondering if this hook might run afoul of WP:DYKBLP. ~Darth StabroTalk • Contribs 02:12, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    I don't think it is, though I can see how it possibly could be. @FozzieHey: do you have an alternate hook we could use? lullabying (talk) 05:39, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    The RAIB report (paragraph 61) states The driver was using his mobile telephone while driving the train. Other paragraphs in the same report (e.g. paras 39, 62, 114) confirm that this mobile phone use was shortly before the collision. I don't see this as a BLP concern. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 10:15, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    My understanding of WP:DYKBLP was that it was intended to prevent undue hooks on BLP articles like "... that John Doe committed xyz crimes?" The guideline mentions an "individual's wider life". In this hook, we're not naming the driver, and we're just explaining what led to the accident. Quite a lot of disasters (such as train crashes and airplane crashes) have human error as contributing factors, I don't think mentioning these in the hook violates the guideline. It'd be good to get other people's thoughts on this though. FozzieHey (talk) 18:57, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yvette Greer-Albrecht

  • ... that Yvette Greer-Albrecht was named as the Female College Athlete of the Year by the South Dakota Sportswriters Association in 1979?
  • Source: Tillman, Jim (2023). The Journal of African American History Vol. 1 - Sioux City, Iowa. p. 45.
Created by SL93 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 435 past nominations.

SL93 (talk) 02:38, 27 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]

  • : Had a read on the reference. Haven't seen anything on the reference to indicate her being named as such in 1979. Feel free to direct me to a reference to look it up if's it there. Thanks. Ominae (talk) 06:01, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Ominae I'm not sure how you managed to read the print reference. It says, "In 1979 the South Dakota Sportswriters Association named her as the Female College Athlete of the Year." SL93 (talk) 06:16, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Amtrak Susquehanna River Bridge

Improved to Good Article status by Pi.1415926535 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 61 past nominations.

Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:44, 27 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]

  • I drive by where this with some frequency. A delightful area. Anyhow, QPQ done, nominated soon enough, and no copyright concerns. The hooks are sourced, cited, interesting, and short enough. No image attached to hook. If you want me to get a picture of the construction that is already underway, I'll be in the area sometime soon and can make a detour. Great work! ~ Pbritti (talk) 03:18, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

High and Low (1963 film)

  • Source: Richie, Donald (1970). The Films of Akira Kurosawa (2nd ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press. p. 183. ISBN 0520017811.
  • ALT1: ... that after the release of High and Low, director Akira Kurosawa received telephone calls imitating his film that threatened to kidnap his daughter? Source: Kurosawa, Kazuko (2000). パパ、黒澤明 [Papa, Kurosawa Akira] (in Japanese). Tokyo: Bungei Shunjū. p. 30.
  • Reviewed:
Improved to Good Article status by Plifal (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

Plifal (talk) 12:10, 27 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]

Article has achieved Good Article status. No issues of copyvio or plagiarism. All sources appear reliable. Hooks are interesting and sourced. QPQ is not needed. Looks ready to go. Thriley (talk) 18:03, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Thriley, given the upcoming reinterpretation by spike lee, would it be possible to have this GAN coincide with the theatrical release of his remake on 22 august 2025?--Plifal (talk) 11:14, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I think that is possible. I'll make a request. Thriley (talk) 13:43, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
saw the request and response earlier, regardless, thank you for asking!--Plifal (talk) 09:44, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on April 28

[edit]

Regulations on children's television programming in the United States

Improved to Good Article status by ViperSnake151 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 80 past nominations.

ViperSnake151  Talk  04:13, 2 May 2025 (UTC).[reply]

Came up with another option. ViperSnake151  Talk  23:48, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Natural Dis-tinction Un-natural Selection

Minidresses from the collection with digitally-engineered prints
Minidresses from the collection with digitally-engineered prints
Moved to mainspace by Premeditated Chaos (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 62 past nominations.

PMC(talk) 02:06, 29 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]

Article created 28 April. No issues of copyvio or plagiarism. All sources appear reliable. Hook is interesting and sourced. QPQ is done. Looks ready to go. Thriley (talk) 17:13, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Jeremy Crawshaw

  • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/KUAT-TV
  • Comment: To do QPQ within a day or two. It seems that I'm two days late, given that the article was partly expanded by another user before I did the full expansion. Requesting an extension per WP:DYKG: The seven-day limit can be extended for a day or two upon request.
5x expanded by BeanieFan11 (talk) and 62.57.120.243 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 360 past nominations.

BeanieFan11 (talk) 21:55, 7 May 2025 (UTC).[reply]


General: Article is new enough and long enough

Policy compliance:

Hook eligibility:

  • Cited: Yes
  • Interesting: Yes
  • Other problems: Yes
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Good to go. COMMENTS: Newness: Nominator requested a 2-day extension. Nomination for the expanded article within the extended time window. Hook Interest: While the hook is short, it is interesting - I was surprised he was the only punter drafted. — ERcheck (talk) 20:46, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

North Korean destroyer Choe Hyon

Also am open to other references.

5x expanded by Ominae (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 17 past nominations.

Ominae (talk) 06:06, 28 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]

  • Date, size, refs, neutrality, QPQ, copyvio spotcheck, ok. The hooks, however, are problematic. The first one is a pretty random trivia-like claim that does not sound very interesting (yes, it is my subjective view). The second one would be more interesting, if put in context (what's the average time for contstructing such ship these days?) and, crucially, if it was sourced to a RS, rather than a NK party official. I'd suggest making a simpler hook about how the "ship's construction is the largest vessel ever constructed in North Korea". Further, the lead of the article does not follow WP:LEAD - it contains a claim (by Lim Eul-chul) that does not seem to be present elsewhere in the article. Why is Lim Eul-chul and its institution not hyperlinked (see also WP:RED)? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 11:50, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

For the WP:LEAD, I can double check and see where else I can put more info to back up Lim's assessment on the destroyer. As for Lim, I'm sure he has no article here in the wiki. Ominae (talk) 14:15, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

        • The hook is fine now. For the lead, Lim's claim should be moved to the body; instead, the lead should summarize key facts. I am getting good results having AI like ChatGPT summarize article for Wikipedia's lead - try it (of course, double check it, please). As for links, it is worth to check Korean Wikipedia and if it has articles, link them via {{ill}}. Anyway, these are minor concern, more for GA than DYK, so passing. Thanks for the article! --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:36, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Riverine rabbit

Bunolagus monticularis
Bunolagus monticularis
  • Source: Ferguson, J.W.H. (July 1994). "The riverine rabbit saga". South African Journal of Science. 90. Subsequently, in 1947, Captain C.G. Shortridge, curator of the Kaffrarian Museum in King William's Town, collected some 20 specimens. He offered one pound sterling for each rabbit brought to him and, as a consequence, the animal came to be known as the 'pondhaas'.
Improved to Good Article status by Reconrabbit (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 10 past nominations.

-- Reconrabbit 15:42, 4 May 2025 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Looks good. Nice work. BeanieFan11 (talk) 21:47, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Gustav Conrau

  • ... that the German explorer Gustav Conrau shot himself in 1899 to avoid recapture, according to a later report by his local interpreter?
Created by Munfarid1 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 31 past nominations.

Munfarid1 (talk) 19:51, 3 May 2025 (UTC).[reply]

  • I will review this article in the coming days! WatkynBassett (talk) 08:24, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • The article was created on 28 April 2025‎ and nominated on 3 May 2025. It is thus eligible.
  • The article is well-sourced. I did two spot checks and they checked out. The sources could, however, be much better organized if you intend to take the article to GA later (using Sfn-References helps a lot, in my opinion). But this is of no interest to DYK ... :-)
  • The article is written in a neutral and non-promotional tone. I did some copy editing, feel free to change back, if you dislike my changes.
  • Earwig picked up the quotes, which is - of course - perfectly fine.
  • QPQ done.
  • Hook review: I think the first hook is the best one. I added a "the" to avoid the false title and a "to avoid recapture" to make it more interesting. If you have concerns - feel free to discuss.
  • @Munfarid1: Thank you very much for this great work. It was a pleasure to read and very interesting. Original hook approved . WatkynBassett (talk) 19:26, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@WatkynBassett: Thanks for your help and positive feedback.Munfarid1 (talk) 07:38, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Máximo Bistrot

  • ... that after being denied a table at Máximo Bistrot, one diner prompted a temporary closure by raising concerns over the reservation system?
  • Source: * Quadratin: The Federal Consumer Protection Agency (Profeco) reported that the suspension seals have been removed from the restaurant “Máximo Bistrot Local” after the establishment addressed the cited issues. The restaurant had been shut down days earlier following a scandal involving the daughter of the agency's head, Humberto Benítez Treviño, who caused a scene when she was not given the table she wanted [...]
  • According to the document issued by the federal agency itself [...] At the time of the inspection, it was confirmed that the establishment offers restaurant services through a reservation system, without informing consumers—by any means or in any form—of the applicable policies and procedures, particularly regarding table assignments.
Created by Tbhotch (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 54 past nominations.

(CC) Tbhotch 17:37, 29 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]

Argo (dog)

  • ... that a stray dog named Argo visited the ruins of Pompeii daily for 15 years and was considered its guardian until he died in 2024?
Created by 151.12.29.138 (talk) and BuySomeApples (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 46 past nominations.

BuySomeApples (talk) 06:56, 29 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]

  • Comments by Tbhotch

General eligibility:

Policy compliance:

Hook eligibility:

  • Cited: Yes
  • Interesting: Yes
  • Other problems: Yes
QPQ: Done.

Overall: A new article. QPQ done. No copyvio issues. Long enough. Neutral. The sources back-up the statements excepting: "He joined school and tourist groups visiting Pompeii" - The source says "that he baceame a symbol between workers and visitors" and this source never mentions that Argo joined any groups. @BuySomeApples: (CC) Tbhotch 18:12, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review! I fixed that ref @Tbhotch: the ref for the school groups and tourists line should have been the same source as the guardian bit. BuySomeApples (talk) 19:18, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Good to go. (CC) Tbhotch 03:42, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Path (The Last of Us)

The Last of Us production
Converted from a redirect by Rhain (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 92 past nominations.

Rhain (he/him) 23:53, 28 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]

Policy compliance:

Hook eligibility:

  • Cited: Yes
  • Interesting: Yes
  • Other problems: Yes
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Earwig turns up 57% copyvio from this; could you just go back and check to make sure there isn't any/the possibility this is some kind of error? Here is the Earwig link. I think the imdb may be copying from Wikipedia, but just want clarity. As for the hooks, I think ALT1 is uninteresting, ALT2 is not really considering that many movies/shows build sets that are only used once, ALT4 would need attribution to the reviewer. I do like ALT0 and my favourite is ALT3. It would catch my attention on the front page (though I do get that, again, I suppose filming in mundane locations like Vancouver is pretty common). All cited. @Rhain: just provide clarity on the copyvio problem & which hook you prefer jolielover♥talk 19:18, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review, Jolielover! IMDb is definitely copying from Wikipedia there; for instance, I wrote that sentence about additional photography back in September, whereas IMDb trivia is only written after an episode airs. (Looks like they've borrowed our information about other episodes as well, which I hadn't noticed before.) ALT0 and ALT3 are probably my favourites too. Rhain (he/him) 21:00, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Haridas Mitra

  • Source: Who's who 1972: General Election, March 1972. West Bengal Legislative Assembly Secretariat, 1974. pp. 50-51, Gopal Gandhi. A Frank Friendship: Gandhi and Bengal : a Descriptive Chronology. Seagull Books, 2007. p. 1953
Moved to mainspace by Soman (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 433 past nominations.

Soman (talk) 11:36, 28 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]

  • New article, long enough, no copyvio, neutral. The hook is sourced and interesting. QPQ is done. I made some fixes to the article, otherwise this is good to go. As I cannot access the hook's source, I accept in good faith. Applodion (talk) 21:50, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Rhino Boy Chris

Rhino Boy Chris in his rhinoceros costume after a marathon in 2022
Rhino Boy Chris in his rhinoceros costume after a marathon in 2022
  • ... that Rhino Boy Chris has run 113 marathons wearing a rhinoceros costume to raise awareness for rhino conservation?
  • Reviewed:
Created by Nayyn (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

Nayyn (talk) 12:20, 28 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: None required.

Overall: Looks mostly good. The only issue I see, @Nayyn:, is that the article says both that Green has run more than 150 marathons in a rhinoceros suit to raise awareness for conservation initiatives. and As of the 2025 London Marathon, Green has run 113 marathons in the same 10kg rhino suit. – is it 113 or over 150? BeanieFan11 (talk) 22:08, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Pope Donus II

Fanciful illustration of Donus II from 1675
Fanciful illustration of Donus II from 1675
  • ... that despite being praised for his honorable conduct by later historians, Pope Donus II (pictured) never existed?

"Attention must now be called to the fact that no Pope of the name of Domnus (or Donus II.) had any existence at this time,"

from https://archive.org/details/popesearlymid04mannuoft/page/312/mode/2up?q=%22Donus+II%22
5x expanded by GGOTCC (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

GGOTCC 01:24, 29 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]

  • Newly expanded to slightly over 5X the stub, no copyright/close paraphrasing issues; well-sourced, neutrally voiced, presentable; very interesting even as a footnote, with hooks cited to good scholarly sources; image is public domain (the license should be completed with a PD art one, since the original image is from the Renaissance), but not exactly high quality (also consider uploading this alternative). No QPQ required from nominator. This article is a nice break from all the trite promotional articles about vapid and terminally online celebrities. Dahn (talk) 05:50, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
How does the new image look? Thanks!
Perfect! Dahn (talk) 12:14, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Driocephalus

  • Source: Diebakate, Cheikhna; Raibaut, André; Kabata, Zbigniew (1997). "Thamnocephalus cerebrinoxius n. g., n. sp. (Copepoda: Sphyriidae), a parasite in the nasal capsules of Leptocharias smithii (Müller & Henle, 1839) (Pisces: Leptochariidae) off the coast of Senegal". Systematic Parasitology. 38 (3): 231–235. doi.org/10.1023/A:1005840205269.
  • ALT1: ... that the parasitic copepod Driocephalus cerebrinoxius burrows into the brains of sharks through their noses? Source: Diebakate, Cheikhna; Raibaut, André; Kabata, Zbigniew (1997). "Thamnocephalus cerebrinoxius n. g., n. sp. (Copepoda: Sphyriidae), a parasite in the nasal capsules of Leptocharias smithii (Müller & Henle, 1839) (Pisces: Leptochariidae) off the coast of Senegal". Systematic Parasitology. 38 (3): 231–235. doi.org/10.1023/A:1005840205269.
  • Reviewed:
  • Comment: Open to other suggestions for hooks, I think this topic has a lot of potential. ALT1 is more exciting, but a bit simplistic...
Created by Ethmostigmus (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

Ethmostigmus 🌿 (talk | contribs) 10:03, 28 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
  • Cited: Yes - Offline/paywalled citation accepted in good faith
  • Interesting: Yes
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Technically it looks like the sources say "nervous system" but if they're entering through the nose, it sounds like brain is accurate. AGF on hoof references, and the other refs seem to say the same. Article long enough and new enough with no copyvio. Either hook works, I leave it to the promoter's discretion. BuySomeApples (talk) 03:08, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Cheers BuySomeApples, I forgot that paper is paywalled - the publicly available abstract states The most characteristic feature of this copepod is its holdfast of numerous, profusely branching dendrites that penetrate the olfactory lobe of the host’s brain. This type of host-parasite relationship is unique among all known parasitic copepods, but if the promoter wants to double check (which I would certainly encourage!), the full text is accessible on Springer Nature Link via WP:TWL and discusses this in a bit more detail. Ethmostigmus 🌿 (talk | contribs) 04:07, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tom Farris

  • ... that American football player Tom Farris thought he was a jinx for every team he played for, so he asked his coach to be traded to an opposing team to make them lose?
  • Reviewed:
Improved to Good Article status by History6042 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

History6042😊 (Contact me) 00:17, 29 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: None required.

Overall: Newly-promoted GA, article looks good. No QPQ required. Personally, I probably add context in the hook to note that he's a football player (e.g. ... that football player Tom Farris thought...), but I'll leave it to you to decide if you want to do that. Either way, approved. BeanieFan11 (talk) 02:09, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

How to Stay Married (book)

Created by Lajmmoore (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 136 past nominations.

Lajmmoore (talk) 12:07, 28 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Valorrr (lets chat) 00:45, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on April 29

[edit]

Mee siam mai hum

Created by Kingoflettuce (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 184 past nominations.

KINGofLETTUCE 👑 🥬 12:26, 6 May 2025 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: ZKang123 (talk · contribs) 15:22, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

QPQ done. Newly created article. Earwig mainly flags the quote from the speech cited in the article. The source for this DYK checks out.--ZKang123 (talk · contribs) 15:22, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Julian Yacoub Mourad

  • Reviewed:
Created by Romanov loyalist (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

Romanov loyalist (talk) 22:25, 29 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: None required.

Overall: Looks good. Nice work. No QPQ required. Approving. BeanieFan11 (talk) 23:18, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Anyós

  • ... that from 2021 to 2022, 40% of the property acquisitions in the Andorran town of Anyós were by people from the Netherlands?
5x expanded by Jon698 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 93 past nominations.

Jon698 (talk) 13:18, 1 May 2025 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Article looks good. Just awaiting QPQ. BeanieFan11 (talk) 23:11, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@BeanieFan11: QPQ added. Jon698 (talk) 17:51, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
BeanieFan11 (talk) 20:03, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Petre Cișmigiu

Cișmigiu in 1966
Cișmigiu in 1966
  • ... that Romanian sports shooter Petre Cișmigiu (pictured) demanded the elimination of a pension gap between Olympic champions and non-Olympic ones, including himself?
  • Source: Andrei Dicu, "Antrenorul emerit de tir, octogenarul Petre Cișmigiu, întreabă: 'De ce Legea sportului tratează, în mod discriminatoriu, campionii mondiali și olimpici?'", in Curierul Național, 16 January 2001, p. 10 -- the whole article is dwells on that topic, so perhaps translating its title would serve the purpose: Octogenarian coach-emeritus in shooting, Petre Cișmigiu, asks: "Why does the law on sports discriminate between world and Olympic champions?".
5x expanded by Dahn (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 115 past nominations.

Dahn (talk) 17:14, 30 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
  • Cited: Yes - Offline/paywalled citation accepted in good faith
  • Interesting: Yes
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Beautiful expansion! Article looks good, hook is interesting, AGF on the offline source. Appears good to go. BeanieFan11 (talk) 21:39, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Surely we can do better than this hook? "Dude wants more money" is not exactly earth shattering news. (t · c) buidhe 22:14, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    • I thought the notion that Olympic champions got more money than all other champions is at least somewhat interesting. On a broader level, it may also be interesting for readers to explore how athletes in former socialist states came to rely on state pensions during their twilight years. Dahn (talk) 05:54, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    • Anyway, I have rephrased the hook to make this issue stand out more clearly. Dahn (talk) 05:59, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on April 30

[edit]

Cosas Four

Created by Buidhe (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 257 past nominations.

(t · c) buidhe 18:16, 30 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]

  • Article was recently expanded from a redirect. It is long enough for DYK and generally in reasonable shape, though I think it might be worth doing some basic polishing-up before it hits the main page. In particular:
  • Could it be given e.g. a clearer structure, a short description, perhaps an image/infobox if appropriate?
  • There are places where more details would help:
  • I found the coverage of the actual killing a little brief, particularly in terms of who was on what side and where the state was involved: were Christiaan Siebert Rorich and Thlomedi Ephraim Mfalapitsa agents of the Security Branch?
  • Why was there a charge of kidnapping, if the activists went to the place of their deaths willingly (albeit under false pretences)?
  • Had the Security Branch previously prepared the place to blow up?
  • Why did the TRC decide that the crime wasn't political?

QPQ is done and there are no evident plagiarism or BLP concerns, though this article does come within the BLP policies. I think ALT0 is an excellent hook and look forward to seeing it on the front page, once these (admittedly subjective and firmly cr. 10) issues are addressed. UndercoverClassicist T·C 15:23, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • UndercoverClassicist I expanded and reorganized the article to make its structure make more sense. None of the sources give more insight into the kidnapping charge and the details provided about the actual killing are limited. Also, there is no reason that I can find that the TRC granted amnesty to some of the involved SB members but not others. (t · c) buidhe 05:52, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Vlado Paradžik

5x expanded by BeanieFan11 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 359 past nominations.

BeanieFan11 (talk) 21:52, 7 May 2025 (UTC).[reply]

Early Winters Ski Resort

Ski touring in the area where the resort was proposed
Ski touring in the area where the resort was proposed
Created by Buidhe (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 258 past nominations.

(t · c) buidhe 02:11, 1 May 2025 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Article appears okay. Hooks is interesting and QPQ done. Should be good to go. BeanieFan11 (talk) 18:03, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Eileen Niedfield

  • ... that doctors stationed in India, like Eileen Niedfield MD of the Medical Mission Sisters, trained nurses for Mother Teresa's Missionaries of Charity, and sometimes they trained each other's teams?
    • ALT1: ... that [Medical Mission Sisters
    • Reviewed:
    • Comment: I'm not sure if I'm supposed to include links and formatting, so I did. Thank you!
Improved to Good Article status by Oh-Fortuna! (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

Oh-Fortuna! (talk) 02:37, 1 May 2025 (UTC).[reply]

  • @Buidhe:I think the hook stripped out because I added formatting, so just now I put it back without formatting, and cut it down to one hook. If you want formatting I can send a version with that. Oh-Fortuna! (talk) 16:30, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    • There's a ton of great DYK material in the article, I'm quite sure we can do better than that. Something about being invited to Bhutan, belonging to a Catholic religious order while helping Muslim and Christian women, etc. (t · c) buidhe 04:33, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    • Okay, how about this? ... that Eileen Niedfield MD, a Medical Mission Sister in India from 1955-1992, treated rural Muslim women who could not afford care and whose fathers or husbands would not let them consult male doctors? Oh-Fortuna! (talk) 19:01, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
      • Shorter is better when it comes to hookiness. I see this is your first DYK so if you don't mind let me propose an alt. Also, please remember to boldface and link the article in question.
    • ALT1b ... that Catholic sister Eileen Niedfield treated many Muslim women whose fathers or husbands would not let them consult male doctors? (t · c) buidhe 03:23, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]


General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
  • Cited: Yes - Offline/paywalled citation accepted in good faith
  • Interesting: Yes
QPQ: None required.

Overall: ALT1c approved (t · c) buidhe 04:49, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Masanori Tanimoto

5x expanded by Miminity (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 18 past nominations.

Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 08:42, 30 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]

Crazy About One Direction

  • ... that a viral hoax claimed 42 people committed suicide after their homoerotic fan art was included in the film Crazy About One Direction?
  • Julia, Jameson (19 December 2021). "'Story of My Life': Why One Direction fans are still participating". Southwestern Mass Communication Journal. 37 (1): 1–19. doi:10.58997/smc.v37i1.97.: 3 
  • Created by Jolielover (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 16 past nominations.

    jolielover♥talk 19:29, 30 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]

    General: Article is new enough and long enough

    Policy compliance:

    Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
    QPQ: Done.

    Overall: The article is new enough, long enough and no copyvio. Both hooks are cited and imo interesting. Leaning towards ALT0 because it might be easier to understand. The synopsis is uncited which is allowed per MOS:FILM, so no issues there. Everything else seems well sourced except for a few minor problems that I'll list below. BuySomeApples (talk) 07:02, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    • @Jolielover: Under reception, it says "The film faced backlash for addressing Larries," can you clarify that this was backlash from fans?
    • In the line about Payne "claiming he "couldn't give a fuck" about Channel 4", per the source it seems like he was talking about the documentary not the channel. Once these are fixed I'll take another look. BuySomeApples (talk) 07:02, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    @BuySomeApples: Added clarity on who the backlash was from (it was from fans), and changed 'Channel 4' to 'the programme', I misinterpreted it and thought he said that about the channel. jolielover♥talk 08:31, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Thanks @Jolielover: this nom looks ready! BuySomeApples (talk) 02:39, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Església de Sant Serni de Canillo

    5x expanded by Jon698 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 94 past nominations.

    Jon698 (talk) 13:23, 1 May 2025 (UTC).[reply]

    • Hi Jon698, review follows: article more than 5x expanded from 30 April; I'm not an expert on Andorran or Catalan websites but the sources used look to be reliable; hook fact is interesting enough and checks out to source cited; sources are all in languages I can't read so AGF that there is no copyright violation from them, Earwig flags up nothing of concern; a QPQ has been carried out. Looks fine to me - Dumelow (talk) 06:14, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    You're Lost Little Girl

    • Source: "When the producer then suggested getting a hooker in to give Morrison a blow job, while he did the vocal, things did not go so well though. 'We went with a later take', Densmore concludes diplomatically" - Wall; "According to the legend, Morrison's 'cosmic mate', Pamela Courson, gave him a blow job while he overdubbed the vocals for 'You're Lost Little Girl'". - Weidman
    Created by Rlendog (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 103 past nominations.

    Rlendog (talk) 00:24, 2 May 2025 (UTC).[reply]

    General: Article is new enough and long enough
    Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
    Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
    QPQ: Done.

    Overall: Article is new enough, long enough, no apparent copyvio. The hook is kind of racy but doesn't break guidelines and it's well sourced. This nom looks good to go. BuySomeApples (talk) 04:02, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    On the other hand, @Rlendog: are there any althooks we can add just in case someone feels these hooks fail WP:GRATUITOUS? The guitarist might work. BuySomeApples (talk) 04:12, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    I think the ALT hook would address any issue with the original hook, but if there is an objection that can be discussed. Rlendog (talk) 13:28, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Misato Haga

    • Reviewed:
    Created by Road Atlanta Turn 5 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

    Road Atlanta Turn 5 (Talk) 20:17, 30 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]

    • @Road Atlanta Turn 5: The article has been expanded more than 5 times in the last week, has no obvious errors, is fully cited, and the hook is cited. However, 'almost' is doing a lot of heavy lifting and seems almost like clickbait IMO. The article insinuates that she could have reached Formula One if the team was accepted, which it did not due to an unexplained reason. The current hooks seems like she was almost about to compete in Formula One, while according to the article, she did not even qualify to do so. Can my points be addressed in the hook and article? is it safe to assume this is your first time in DYK? I don't want to scare you off, and I am willing to stay around and help out to improve the article. Please ping me whenever you are ready. Cheers! GGOTCC 00:34, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    • @GGOTCC: Apologies for the mistakes, it's my first time in DYK but I have thought about a new hook that could maybe be better. If there is anything else I should fix don't hesitate to tell me. Thanks! "...that Misato Haga went from being a race queen to the founder of a team that attempted to join Formula One?
      • @Road Atlanta Turn 5: No need to apologize, that's why I am here :) ! You are clearly the expert on this topic; to my eyes as someone without a background in racing, I was most interested in her carrer path from a race queen to a team founder/manager. Do you think this could work as more intersting hook, such as:
    • ALT2: ... that Misato Haga began her carrer as a race queen before she lead her own motor racing team?

    GGOTCC 20:22, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

      • @GGOTCC: I think this one can do, i'd just fix the typo "carrer" to "career" and to me this suggestion looks fine. I thank you so much for the suggestion and help!
    • ALT3: ... that Misato Haga began her career as a race queen before she lead her own motor racing team?

    Soliloquy

    5x expanded by MallardTV (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

    MallardTV Talk to me! 11:29, 30 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]

    • DYK compliance check:
    Topic is encyclopedic
    Article created November 20, 2003. Qualification for DYK is per 5x expansion.
    Article is minimum length for DYK (2953 words)
    Article is well-sourced, neutral, BLP-compliant, and copyvio-free.
    Article is presentable
    All hooks are cited to a reliable source
    All hooks are short enough.
    All hooks are interesting. I am veering towards the first because the wording gives it a mysterious quality.
    Not applicable: hook does not have image
    Not applicable: QPQ not required
    RESULT: ViperSnake151  Talk  02:41, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    PWHL Seattle

    Created by SounderBruce (talk) and Wasianpower (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 255 past nominations.

    SounderBruce 17:23, 30 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]

    General: Article is new enough and long enough
    Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
    Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
    QPQ: Done.

    Overall: Article looks good. Either hook should work. Awaiting QPQ. BeanieFan11 (talk) 21:13, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    @BeanieFan11: QPQ added. SounderBruce 21:46, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    BeanieFan11 (talk) 19:33, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Articles created/expanded on May 1

    [edit]

    Montages of a Modern Motherhood, Hedwig Tam

    Hedwig Tam
    Hedwig Tam
    Created by Prince of Erebor (talk). Number of QPQs required: 2. Nominator has 39 past nominations.

    👑PRINCE of EREBOR📜 16:04, 1 May 2025 (UTC).[reply]

    General: Article is new enough and long enough
    Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
    Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
    Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
    QPQ: Done.

    Overall: Citations 1, 5, 10, 15, and 20 randomly spot-checked in both articles for verification; no issues arose. All the hooks are mentioned and verified with the given sources in Montages of a Modern Motherhood (primary article). This requirement is fulfilled by the primary article and not needed in the other article. Yue🌙 04:40, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    References

    1. ^ 溫敏芝 (18 April 2025). "增肥20磅演新手媽媽地獄之旅 談善言對母親多了感恩和歉疚|封面故事". Ming Pao (in Chinese). Retrieved 28 April 2025. 為了營造產後媽媽的身形,她增肥二十磅,「其實是要增多一點,因為我本身的臉很削,在鏡頭上會很明顯,如果不是wide shot,也未必察覺到我增了肥,其實我在戲中是有雙下巴,沒辦法,我先天因素不明顯。」 [To portray the figure of a postpartum mother, she gained twenty pounds. "Actually, I needed to gain a bit more because my face is naturally quite thin, which is very noticeable on camera. If it is not a wide shot, you might not even realize I gained weight. In the film, I actually have a double chin; there is nothing I can do about it since my natural factors aren't obvious."]
    2. ^ 莫匡堯 (26 April 2025). "專訪︱談善言小野童年哭鬧性格相反 談:我唔難湊但生咗十幾個鐘". HK01 (in Chinese). Retrieved 28 April 2025. 談善言亦表示:「當時余香凝很好,讓我到她家中留宿一宵,連她老公也要回父母家中,讓我能夠與她傾談、體驗照顧嬰兒的過程。另外亦家訪許多母親,分享育兒過程、餵哺母乳、照顧嬰兒同時做家務、甚至婆媳糾紛及自我價值。」 [Tam also mentioned, "At that time, Jennifer was very kind, allowing me to stay over at her house for a night. Even her husband went back to his parents' home, so I could discuss and experience the process of caring for a baby. I also visited many mothers to share their parenting experiences, breastfeeding, managing housework while caring for infants, and even dealing with mother-in-law disputes and self-worth issues."]
    3. ^ 桑妮 (22 November 2024). "2024金馬影展 │至喜混雜至哀,新手媽媽之難:《虎毒不》演員談善言、盧鎮業訪問". Golden Horse Film Festival (in Chinese). Retrieved 28 April 2025. 她也去找剛生產不久的演員好友余香凝,請對方「出借寶寶」提供練習。 [She also reached out to her actress friend Jennifer Yu, who had recently given birth, asking her to "lend" her baby for practice.]
    4. ^ Ho, Ar-nam; Ma, Pony (30 November 2024). "「拍電影再如何辛苦,還不及母親困境的百分之一」──導演陳小娟,以《虎毒不》向社會提問". Funscreen Weekly (in Chinese). Retrieved 28 April 2025. 還是想有視覺上有美感,不論光線構圖,蘇偉鍵其中一個提議是常常把女主角置中,我們選了一個 wide screen 的比例,一直把她放在中間,究竟什麼時候比較小,什麼時候比較大,都是選擇。 [We still wanted to achieve visual beauty, regardless of lighting and composition. One of So Wai-kin's suggestions was to frequently center the female lead. We chose a widescreen aspect ratio, consistently placing her in the middle, deciding when she appears smaller and when larger.]
    5. ^ 莫匡堯 (26 April 2025). "虎毒不︱談善言增肥20磅演出自言不願生育 小野幽默一語道破原因". HK01 (in Chinese). Retrieved 28 April 2025. 談善言表示:「那個裸露鏡頭其實是假皮,當時試鏡已經有說過,小娟一開始就問可否增肥、第二是可否裸露,她說『如果我們有預算的話會做假皮』!」導演陳小娟隨即笑言:「不,早已預算好的!因為做假皮是在拍攝前。」陳小娟表示尚未成為人母的談善言,難以弄出妊娠紋的效果,於是需要透過假皮模擬效果。 [Hedwig Tam stated, "That nude shot is actually prosthetic skin. During the audition, it was mentioned that Oliver [Chan] initially asked if she could gain weight, and secondly, if she could be nude. She said, 'If we have the budget, we will use prosthetic skin!'" Director Oliver Chan then joked, "No, that was already budgeted! Because making prosthetic skin is done before filming." Chan noted that Tam, who has not yet become a mother, would find it difficult to create the effect of stretch marks, so they needed to simulate it with prosthetic skin.]
    6. ^ 黃嘉瀛 (24 April 2025). "《虎毒不》導演陳小娟:關於媽媽,和需要被看見的照顧者們". Initium Media (in Chinese). Retrieved 28 April 2025. 作為一位尚未成為母親的演員,她要演出一個被育兒經驗磨損至極限的女性,對情緒體感與角色邏輯的掌握需要極高強度的轉換與理解。 [As an actress who has not yet given birth, she must portray a woman worn down to her limits by the experience of parenting. This requires an exceptionally high level of emotional understanding and character logic.]
    7. ^ 熊景玉 (21 November 2024). "談善言哄嬰兒一度想當媽 演完戲退駕放下念頭". Mirror Media (in Chinese). Retrieved 29 April 2025. 早已表明是「不生族」的談善言接下「虎毒不」裡新手媽的角色,戲外做足功課,她與多位媽媽相處,學習怎樣照顧嬰孩,甚至包括哺乳 [Tam, who has already declared that she would not give birth to children, took on the role of a new mother in Montages of a Modern Motherhood. Outside of filming, she prepared by interacting with several mothers, learning how to care for infants, including breastfeeding.]
    8. ^ Lim, Ruey Yan (14 January 2025). "Sean Lau named Best Actor by Hong Kong Film Critics Society for record fifth time". The Straits Times. Retrieved 23 April 2025. Tam, 34, won Best Actress for her role as a first-time mother coping with several challenges in Montages Of A Modern Motherhood, directed by Hong Kong film-maker Oliver Chan.

    Terry Bussey

    Moved to mainspace by BeanieFan11 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 361 past nominations.

    BeanieFan11 (talk) 23:35, 8 May 2025 (UTC).[reply]

    General: Article is new enough and long enough

    Policy compliance:

    Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
    QPQ: Done.

    Overall: My reaction to the hook can be summarized with the word "ouch!", with a side of "I am very glad I am not a football player". But excellent work with this article; Bussey seems to be a really talented guy. Nicely done :) HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 05:47, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Hurricane Larry

    Hurricane Larry on September 5, 2021
    Hurricane Larry on September 5, 2021
    Improved to Good Article status by Chicdat (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

    🐔 Chicdat  Bawk to me! 22:04, 1 May 2025 (UTC).[reply]

    General: Article is new enough and long enough
    Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems

    Hook eligibility:

    • Cited: No - Is it actually confirmed that the Antiguan man was the one who stole the boat? According to the two articles cited, it seems the boat owner is merely speculating about that. Also, are we sure that the two sources are reliable? I have no view on reliability—I just haven't heard of either Ocean Navigator or Maritime Executive before, and they both seem like more niche publications outside of the mainstream media. We could potentially use CBC News instead: [22][23].
    • Interesting: Yes
    Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
    QPQ: None required.

    Overall: I'm thinking we can rescue this hook by being more clear both in the hook and the article that the connection between the missing man and the boat is speculative, and perhaps using the CBC News articles instead of the maritime sources (although I am okay with leaving the maritime sources if we insist). I would also err on the side of caution per WP:BLPCRIME and avoid naming the missing man directly and describe him as an "Antiguan man" instead of a "criminal". Mz7 (talk) 02:01, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    KGAN

    Improved to Good Article status by Sammi Brie (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 762 past nominations.

    Sammi Brie (she/her · t · c) 22:53, 4 May 2025 (UTC).[reply]

    General: Article is new enough and long enough
    Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
    Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
    QPQ: Done.

    Overall: I like it! Article appears good, a newly promoted GA, and the hook is interesting. Should be good to go. BeanieFan11 (talk) 02:22, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Gammarelli

    • ... that Gammarelli, the official tailor of the Pope, is one of the oldest family-run businesses in Europe?
    5x expanded by Maximilian775 (talk) and Darth Stabro (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 16 past nominations.

    Maximilian775 (talk) 01:07, 4 May 2025 (UTC).[reply]

    General: Article is new enough and long enough
    Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
    Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
    QPQ: Done.

    Overall: Looks good. Nice work. BeanieFan11 (talk) 18:35, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Robert Brodribb Hammond

    • Source: "Hammond's most adventurous project aimed to provide a more long-term solution to the problem of the destitute families who had suffered, or were threatened with, eviction from their rented homes...by 1939 110 cottages had been built on a 225 acre settlement which had grown into the suburb of Hammondville." Stephen Judd and Kenneth Cable (1987), Sydney Anglicans, p.203
    • Reviewed:
    Improved to Good Article status by MCE89 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

    MCE89 (talk) 15:21, 3 May 2025 (UTC).[reply]

    General: Article is new enough and long enough
    Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
    Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
    • Cited: Yes - Offline/paywalled citation accepted in good faith
    • Interesting: Yes
    QPQ: None required.

    Overall: Article is a good article. I did a cursory glance to make sure that the article was suitable for DYK, but I am largely trusting Dclemens' review. Hook is interesting but I would like if you could find something more concise. If not, that's fine and what you have is acceptable. ❤HistoryTheorist❤ 15:24, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Thanks HistoryTheorist, and apologies for the slow response! I'd also be happy with this slightly more concise version:
    Hopefully that hook is acceptable. MCE89 (talk) 12:22, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    No, worries! That hook works as well! At this point, the promoter of the hook is free to pick either one, although ALT1 is more to-the-point.

    Flower

    • ... that a sunflower is not a flower?
    Improved to Good Article status by Dracophyllum (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 6 past nominations.

    Dracophyllum 05:13, 3 May 2025 (UTC).[reply]

    General eligibility:

    Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
    Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
    Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
    QPQ: Done.

    Overall: Recent GA article checks out on sourcing, length, copyvio, etc. Next stop featured article? @Dracophyllum: It would be nice to include a photo, the sunflower in the gallery at the top of the page is very eye-catching. BuySomeApples (talk) 06:16, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    A sunflower inflorescence

    Sima de los Huesos hominins

    Elvis the Pelvis
    Elvis the Pelvis
    Created by Dunkleosteus77 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 7 past nominations.

    Dunkleosteus77 (talk) 16:13, 1 May 2025 (UTC).[reply]

    • Comment: Article is new enough (+85,978, no drafts???). Article is long enough. Earwig shows minimal similarity. Due to the amount of offline sources, I'm going to have to assume good faith that most claims are accurate to the source, though I see no claims needing a citation that doesn't have one. Article is presentable. Spotchecked four/five photographs, including hook one, licenses all check out. Hook's short enough. QPQ is done. No other issues.
    • For the hook, specifically Still need some clarification. The provided source does not quote "Elvis" nor "pelvis" nor "1994", so I'm not sure we can confidently say that Elvis suffered like from rickets like the rest of his people. Bremps... 17:07, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    "The morphology of the cysts in the Pelvis 1 [Elvis] fits exactly the above description of brown tumours...the brown tumours here are pathognomonic of severe long-standing rickets" Dunkleosteus77 (talk) 17:34, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Pass. Congratulations! And yes, I'd agree that this is good for WP:DYKAPRIL. It got a good chuckle out of me. Bremps... 04:38, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Articles created/expanded on May 2

    [edit]

    Interface Interruption

    • ... that a commercial for a streaming service caused arguments in households?
    Created by Jessica3801 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

    Jessica3801 (talk) 16:28, 6 May 2025 (UTC).[reply]

    General: Article is new enough and long enough
    Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
    Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
    Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
    QPQ: Done.

    Overall: Going with the ALT 0 as mentioned by DS, sourced to [24] and [25] Sohom (talk) 12:22, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Ratwita Gandasoebrata

    Created by Jeromi Mikhael (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 76 past nominations.

    Regards, Jeromi Mikhael 03:17, 5 May 2025 (UTC).[reply]

    • Article new and long enough. Referencing is adequate. No copyvio detected by Earwig (unsurprising considering there are no English sources), hook fact verified in the book source. Approval pending completion of QPQ review. Juxlos (talk) 12:05, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Kentuck Knob

    Kentuck Knob
    Kentuck Knob
    5x expanded by Epicgenius (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 720 past nominations.

    Epicgenius (talk) 18:04, 2 May 2025 (UTC).[reply]

    Interesting house and hooks, I love ALT1 about love, thank you User:Narutolovehinata5. I don't think, though, that the image makes clear why he fell in love, - how about the one with the stone facade? Review to be continued. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:32, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Fine article, on excellent sources, offline sources accepted AGF, no copyvio obvious. The image is licensed, but see above. Small details I'd suggest in the article:
    1. "The driveway is illuminated by a copper lamppost designed by Frank Lloyd Wright, who also designed the house." - made me smile, but I don't think it belongs in the section about "Geography and site usage".
    2. Wright claimed he could "shake a design out of my sleeve" - I'm no friend of "he" in the sentence and "my" in the quote.
    3. ref numbering 52-40 in "Facade" while ascending everywhere else that I saw. Epicgenius, what do you think about a different image for ALT1? Do you plan to write about the houses in the Usonia Historic District? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:22, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks for the review, Gerda Arendt. For (1), I moved that detail, and for (2), I changed it from third-person to first-person. For (3), I changed the ref numbers, and I can suggest File:Kentuck Knob 20190516 (28) - "Up In My Grille".jpg. Maybe I'll write about the Usonian district in the near future - I have a few more FLW projects on my radar. Epicgenius (talk) 15:39, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Kentuck Knob detail
    Kentuck Knob detail
    - ALT1 preferred. Thank you for the changes! I re-added the image I had in mind, - in stamp, size, resolution doesn't matter too much. Both images are properly licensed. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:58, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Martin v. United States

    Moved to mainspace by Mz7 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 6 past nominations.

    Mz7 (talk) 02:05, 2 May 2025 (UTC).[reply]

    • article is recently moved to mainspace, long enough and within policy. Hook is short enough and interesting to a general audience. Earwig was high but appears to mostly be quotes. QPQ is complete. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 18:19, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Mobile Defence Corps

    • ... that the role of the British Army's Mobile Defence Corps was to carry out rescue work in the aftermath of a nuclear attack?
    Moved to mainspace by Dumelow (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 918 past nominations.

    Dumelow (talk) 13:19, 2 May 2025 (UTC).[reply]

    • Approved. Article was recently moved to mainspace, and is generally in good nick. It is fully cited to reasonable sources: some are primary rather than academic, which is not ideal, but they are all government or similarly official documents which meet the relatively low WP:RS bar required here. There are no evident plagiarism, BLP or copyvio concerns: at one point, our summary of Hansard tacks very closely to Hansard itself, but I think we're on the right side of the line. QPQ is done. The hook is cited and checks out; it is reasonably interesting, but perhaps some ALTs would be helpful. UndercoverClassicist T·C 17:07, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    1981 Brooklyn County District Attorney election

    Elizabeth Holtzman
    Elizabeth Holtzman
    Page 68 of Le Veness, Frank; Sweeney, Jane (1987). Women Leaders in Contemporary U.S. Politics. Boulder, Colorado: Lynne Rienner Publishers. doi:10.1515/9781685859480. ISBN 978-0-931477-87-4.
    Moved to mainspace by Jon698 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 95 past nominations.

    Jon698 (talk) 23:04, 2 May 2025 (UTC).[reply]

    General: Article is new enough and long enough
    Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
    Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
    • Cited: Yes - Offline/paywalled citation accepted in good faith
    • Interesting: Yes
    Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
    QPQ: Done.

    Overall: Recommend adding Holtzman's image. Vacant0 (talkcontribs) 16:44, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    @Vacant0: QPQ and image added. Jon698 (talk) 16:54, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    @Jon698 and Vacant0: Just noting that the image won't fly per WP:DYKDIVERT.--Launchballer 17:33, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Articles created/expanded on May 3

    [edit]

    Lucky Day (Doctor Who)

    • ... that two-thirds of the six-week budget allocated to filming the Doctor Who episode "Lucky Day" was used in only three days?
    Moved to mainspace by TheDoctorWho (talk) and Pokelego999 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 14 past nominations.

    TheDoctorWho (talk) 03:59, 5 May 2025 (UTC).[reply]

    • New enough and long enough. QPQ present. Hook facts must AGF as I am not in the UK and cannot access at the provided link. ALT0 is stronger than ALT1. No textual issues. Good to go. Sammi Brie (she/her · t · c) 01:16, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Bleat!

    • ... that Ananth Subramaniam came up with Bleat! after thinking of a pregnant goat?
    Created by Jon698 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 96 past nominations.

    Jon698 (talk) 20:29, 5 May 2025 (UTC).[reply]

    General: Article is new enough and long enough
    Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
    Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
    QPQ: Done.

    Overall: Did both manual and DYK tool checks, article and hook passed all criteria. Hook is mentioned implicitly in the source and is very interesting (and gross? how did you come up with an image of a pregnant goat out of nowhere) Overall good job! Regards, Jeromi Mikhael 18:07, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    KUAT-TV

    Improved to Good Article status by Sammi Brie (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 764 past nominations.

    Sammi Brie (she/her · t · c) 20:02, 7 May 2025 (UTC).[reply]

    General: Article is new enough and long enough
    Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
    Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
    QPQ: Done.

    Overall: Looks good as usual. Don't see any issues with this newly-promoted GA. Approving. BeanieFan11 (talk) 03:03, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    KVEO-TV

    Improved to Good Article status by Sammi Brie (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 763 past nominations.

    Sammi Brie (she/her · t · c) 19:47, 7 May 2025 (UTC).[reply]

    Alfonsine Ordinances

    Created by WatkynBassett (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 29 past nominations.

    WatkynBassett (talk) 19:32, 5 May 2025 (UTC).[reply]

    • Article new and long enough with satisfactory referencing. Hook fact confirmed in page 62 of the inline cited source. QPQ has been provided and copyvio has not been detected, Earwig only flagged the book title used as source. Good to go. Juxlos (talk) 11:15, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    2024 Seattle International Film Festival

    Moved to mainspace by Peaceray (talk) and SounderBruce (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 8 past nominations.

    Peaceray (talk) 22:08, 3 May 2025 (UTC).[reply]

    General eligibility:

    Policy compliance:

    Hook eligibility:

    • Cited: Yes
    • Interesting: Yes
    • Other problems: Yes
    QPQ: Done.

    Overall: @SounderBruce: @Peaceray: Moved to mainspace on May 3, so it is new enough. QPQ is met and I can find no grammatical or spelling mistakes. Everything appears to be properly sourced. The hook is interesting and both variants of it are fine. Jon698 (talk) 20:28, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Antimonumento 49 ABC

    Antimonumento 49 ABC
    Antimonumento 49 ABC
    • ... that sculptures of children's shoes at the Antimonumento 49 ABC (pictured)—honoring those killed in a fire—were later stolen?
    • Source: Infobae: "Seven of the 25 bronze pairs of shoes placed on June 5 at the Antimonumento 49 ABC —commemorating the tragic 2009 fire that claimed the lives of 49 children between the ages of 4 and 5— were stolen this Sunday.
  • Regarding the picture File:Antimonumento de la Guardería ABC 22.jpg might also work.
  • Created by Tbhotch (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 55 past nominations.

    (CC) Tbhotch 20:02, 3 May 2025 (UTC).[reply]

    • Article new and long enough - background section is a bit long in proportion but article length is adequate even if it is removed anyway. Earwig score is nil - unsurprising since all the sources are in Spanish. QPQ done, hook fact is cited inline and verified in source via google translate. Image is appropriately licensed, clear enough at the size. Mexico has Freedom of Panorama for public installations so no issues there. Good to go. Juxlos (talk) 17:59, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Frailty (Jane Remover album)

    Improved to Good Article status by Locust member (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 9 past nominations.

    Locust member (talk) 03:05, 3 May 2025 (UTC).[reply]

    • Article recently promoted to GA. Referencing is adequate and the hook fact is both interesting and cited. Verified in the Pitchfork article. Earwig's copyvio score is quite high at 29%, but that is due to a somewhat large number of direct quotations of phrases, which is fine. QPQ has been provided, so it's good to go. Juxlos (talk) 12:14, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Template:Did you know nominations/The First Girl I Loved Template:Did you know nominations/Class (book) Template:Did you know nominations/Torta caprese Template:Did you know nominations/Juancho Yrausquin Template:Did you know nominations/December 2011 Christchurch earthquakes

    Articles created/expanded on May 4

    [edit]

    Template:Did you know nominations/Asri Rasad Template:Did you know nominations/Chalandriani Template:Did you know nominations/Richard L. Morrill

    Articles created/expanded on May 5

    [edit]

    Template:Did you know nominations/Tai's model Template:Did you know nominations/Carlo Rinaldini Template:Did you know nominations/Saxe–Goldstein hypothesis Template:Did you know nominations/Sambas expeditions Template:Did you know nominations/Meg White Template:Did you know nominations/Ivan the Terrible (polar bear) Template:Did you know nominations/Topsy the Camel Template:Did you know nominations/Sack of Yogyakarta

    Articles created/expanded on May 6

    [edit]

    Template:Did you know nominations/Bust of a Chinese Gentleman Template:Did you know nominations/Donnie Creek fire Template:Did you know nominations/Jacques Drollet Template:Did you know nominations/Charlie Suff Template:Did you know nominations/Hana Meličková Template:Did you know nominations/British expedition to Palembang

    Articles created/expanded on May 7

    [edit]

    Template:Did you know nominations/Monk scam Template:Did you know nominations/Mark Mulvoy Template:Did you know nominations/The Little Candle Template:Did you know nominations/Regina George (Mean Girls)

    Articles created/expanded on May 8

    [edit]

    Template:Did you know nominations/2023 EFL League One play-off final Template:Did you know nominations/Yeti (Doctor Who) Template:Did you know nominations/HSwMS Gefle Template:Did you know nominations/St. Augustine Seminary High School Template:Did you know nominations/Grand Prix of Finland Template:Did you know nominations/James M. Goodhue

    Articles created/expanded on May 9

    [edit]

    Template:Did you know nominations/The Acres Template:Did you know nominations/Hiskia Ndjoze-Uanivi Template:Did you know nominations/Teuku Karimoeddin Template:Did you know nominations/Pilot (Arrested Development)

    Articles created/expanded on May 10

    [edit]

    Template:Did you know nominations/Letter to Yi Ŭngt'ae Template:Did you know nominations/CSS fingerprinting Template:Did you know nominations/Keijō nippō

    Articles created/expanded on May 11

    [edit]

    Template:Did you know nominations/Stoughton station

    Articles created/expanded on May 12

    [edit]

    Template:Did you know nominations/Kedopok War