Jump to content

User talk:Hawkeye7

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archives:

2007 · 2008 · 2009 · 2010 · 2011 · 2012 · 2013 · 2014 · 2015 · 2016 · 2017 · 2018 · 2019 · 2020 · 2021 · 2022 · 2023 · 2024
Requests for adminship and bureaucratship update
No current discussions. Recent RfAs, recent RfBs: (successful, unsuccessful)

Tech News: 2025-14

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 00:02, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is to let you know that the above articles have been scheduled as today's featured articles for 6, 8 and 26 May 2025 respectively. Please check that the articles need no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurbs, which can be found at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/May 2025, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of these articles at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/May 2025. Please keep an eye on that page, as notifications of copy edits to or queries about the draft blurb may be left there by user:JennyOz, who assists the coordinators by reviewing the blurbs, or by others. I also suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from two days before each article appears on the Main Page. Thanks, and congratulations on your work! Gog the Mild (talk) 14:36, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations from the Military History Project

[edit]
The WikiChevrons
On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the WikiChevrons for participating in 16 reviews between January and March 2025. Gog the Mild (talk) via MilHistBot (talk) 00:30, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Promotion of Scott Carpenter

[edit]
Congratulations, Hawkeye7! The article you nominated, Scott Carpenter, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.
This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Gog the Mild (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:05, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2025-15

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 18:49, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This Month in GLAM: March 2025

[edit]




Headlines
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

The Signpost: 9 April 2025

[edit]
[edit]
The Downlink The WikiProject Spaceflight Newsletter
2025
1 — 31 March
Volume 3 — Issue 3
Spaceflight Project • Project discussion • Members • Assessment • Open tasks • Popular pages • The Downlink
In the News
  • Firefly Aerospace became the first commercial company to successfully achieve a soft landing on the moon on 2 March with the landing of Blue Ghost Mission 1 near Mons Latreille. It lasted the intended length of one lunar day before losing power on 16 March. It was launched with the Hakuto-R Mission 2 lander Resilience and rover Tenacious, which are planned to land in the Mare Frigoris.
  • On 6 March, the IM-2 mission's lunar lander Athena landed on Mons Mouton. Although intact, it landed sideways, preventing it from generating enough power to operate as designed. The mission was declared over the following day.
  • SpaceX Crew-9 splashed down near Tallahassee, Florida on 18 March. Initially planned to launch with a full complement, the extension of Barry Wilmore and Sunita Williams' stay on the ISS resulted in it being launched with only two crew members.
Article of the month

The Phootprint mission is a candidate for the Mars Robotic Exploration Preparation Programme 2 (MREP-2) at ESA. During 2014, ESA funded a pre-phase A feasibility study and industrial system studies of 8-month duration. Currently, it is in phase A, meaning 'mission definition study.'

The mission would last about 3.5 years, including cruise, mapping orbit, 7 days on the surface, and sample return cruise time. The spacecraft would be powered by solar arrays.

In August 2015, the ESA-Roscosmos working group on post-ExoMars cooperation, completed a joint study for a possible future Phobos Sample Return mission, and preliminary discussions were held.

Image of the month
InSight lander testing

The InSight (Interior Exploration using Seismic Investigations, Geodesy and Heat Transport) lander was selected from among three options in August 2012. Initially planned to launch in March 2016, an instrument issue delayed the launch to May 2018, the next Earth-Mars launch window. It was successfully launched on 5 May, and landed on Elysium Planitia on 26 November 2018. Taking seismographic and thermographic readings, InSight operated for a total of 4 years and 19 days instead of its planned 2 year mission. The mission was declared over on 21 December, 2022 after contact was lost on 15 December. A re-analysis of some of its data indicates that there may be significant amounts of groundwater in Mars' crust.

Members

New Members:

Number of active members: 206. Total number of members: 430.

March Launches
All times stated here are in UTC. See a current list: here.


  1. France Ariane 62CSO-3 (6 Mar. at 16:24 UTC) (success)
  2. United States SpaceX Starship — four Starlink simulators (6 Mar. at 23:30 UTC) (launch failure)
  3. United StatesJapan Rocket Lab Electron — QPS-SAR 9/SUSANOO-1 (15 Mar. at 00:00 UTC) (success)
  4. Germany Spectrumno payload (30 Mar. at 10:30 UTC) (launch failure)
Article Statistics
This data reflects values from the 28 February 2025.

Monthly Changes

Since February 2025, six new low-importance and one new unknown-importance articles have been created. One NA-importance article has been removed, for a total of six new articles. There are also five more C-class articles, three more Start-class articles, two more Stub-class articles, and one more list.

Discuss & propose changes to The Downlink at The Downlink talk page. To unsubscribe from the newsletter remove your name from the Mailing list.
Newsletter contributors: Ships&Space

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:04, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article 2015 WNWBL season has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NSPORT, WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –Aidan721 (talk) 15:34, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2025-16

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 00:21, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue 228, April 2025

[edit]
Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 14:39, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Savannah River Site

[edit]

Please check the date at the start of the Contract Management section. It appears that 1955 must be a typo of some sort since the Westinghouse subsidiary did not exist until the late 1980s. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 08:49, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yup. It should have been 1995. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 09:52, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Manhattan Project feed materials program

[edit]

On 21 April 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Manhattan Project feed materials program, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Manhattan Project feed materials program used uranium ore (pictured) from a mine in Canada near the Arctic Circle? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Manhattan Project feed materials program. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Manhattan Project feed materials program), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2025-17

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 20:57, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Plutonium Finishing Plant

[edit]

The article Plutonium Finishing Plant you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Plutonium Finishing Plant for comments about the article, and Talk:Plutonium Finishing Plant/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Matarisvan -- Matarisvan (talk) 13:22, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

New pages patrol May 2025 Backlog drive

[edit]
May 2025 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol
  • On 1 May 2025, a one-month backlog drive for New Pages Patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Each review will earn 1 point.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:25, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Terminology - "waves" - for Normandy landing

[edit]

@Hawkeye7: Thanks for your B-class review, your DYK assessment, and your comments in DYK.

I found it challenging to untangle/document the landing "waves". John C. Raaen Jr.'s personal accounts, plus others, talk about the "waves", as each landing on Omaha Beach. He refers to the 1st landing on Dog Whte by the 2nd Rangers as the first wave. He refers to his landing with the 5th Rangers as the 3rd wave. This table refers the first wave as all the groups that landed from H-10 minutes to H+1000 minutes. A terminology I've seen for this is "assault wave". Using this definition, Raaen and the 5th Rangers were in the 1st (assault) wave. Do you have any suggestions as to better choice of words for the article? — ERcheck (talk) 01:32, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

All you need to do is qualify the hook with on Omaha Beach. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 01:48, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. If you can find time to listen to any of Raaen's interviews, I highly recommend. The American Veterans Center 2-part video interview was filmed just before Raaen's 102nd birthday. — ERcheck (talk) 01:32, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2025-18

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 19:28, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2025 May newsletter

[edit]

The second round of the 2025 WikiCup ended on 28 April at 23:59 UTC. To reiterate what we said in the previous newsletter, we are no longer disqualifying contestants based on how many points (now known as round points) they received. Instead, the contestants with the highest round-point totals now receive tournament points at the end of each round. These tournament points are carried over between rounds, and can only be earned if a competitor is among the top 16 round-point scorers at the end of each round. This table shows all competitors who have received tournament points so far. Everyone who competed in round 2 will advance to round 3 unless they have withdrawn or been banned.

Round 2 was quite competitive. Four contestants scored more than 1,000 round points, and eight scored more than 500 points (including one who has withdrawn). The following competitors scored at least 800 points:

In addition, we would like to recognize Generalissima (submissions) for her efforts; she scored 801 round points but withdrew before the end of the round.

The full scores for round 2 can be seen here. During this round, contestants have claimed 13 featured articles, 20 featured lists, 4 featured-topic articles, 138 good articles, 7 good-topic articles, and more than 100 Did You Know articles. In addition, competitors have worked on 19 In the News articles, and they have conducted nearly 300 reviews.

Remember that any content promoted after 28 April but before the start of Round 3 can be claimed in Round 3. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:02, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 6 June 2025. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/June 2025, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/June 2025. Please keep an eye on that page, as comments regarding the draft blurb may be left there. I also suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from two days before the article appears on the Main Page. Thanks and congratulations on your work! (also Scott Carpenter on 22 June.) Wehwalt (talk) 10:36, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Citation required is forbidden in the lead

[edit]

Please don't use this line in your edit summaries. It is not correct, please see MOS:LEADCITE.

I generally agree that citations belong in the body of the article. Exceptions should be made for content in the lead that may be edited often because it is controversial or commonly misunderstood. Johnjbarton (talk) 18:46, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You can add {{Leadcite comment}} if someone adds a {{cn}} tag to the lead. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 18:48, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
As it says in the page you linked:
  • MOS:LEADCITE does not prohibit the use of inline citations in any article, so don't use this unless you're certain that there is a current consensus against adding citations to the lead of that particular article.
These are just guidelines. Please don't make up "bans" that don't exist. Johnjbarton (talk) 18:52, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Johnjbarton: Please accept my apology. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 00:33, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for improving the article! Johnjbarton (talk) 02:09, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You too! Great work! I worked on a lot of Manhattan Project people, but not Karl T. Compton; I worked on Arthur Compton Hawkeye7 (discuss) 05:20, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for William Jenkins Wilcox Jr.

[edit]

On 1 May 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article William Jenkins Wilcox Jr., which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that William Jenkins Wilcox Jr. was given a Citizen Archivist award at a symposium titled "Secret City in the Tennessee Hills: From Dogpatch to Nuclear Power"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/William Jenkins Wilcox Jr.. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, William Jenkins Wilcox Jr.), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

SL93 (talk) 00:03, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Olympic Village (Paris)

[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Olympic Village (Paris) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of DrOrinScrivello -- DrOrinScrivello (talk) 18:07, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 1 May 2025

[edit]

Favor to ask - DYK for J. C. Walter Jr.

[edit]

Hello @Hawkeye7. I have a favor to ask you, as you are active on DYK reviewing — would you do a review of the hooks on the DYK nomination for DYK nomination for J. C. Walter Jr.? It seems to be stuck in limbo.

Background: I nominated J. C. Walter Jr. for DYK. It was in the queue for posting when the final reviewer took issue with one of the hooks. It got sent back to the list for approval. I updated the hook to be more precise. User:Launchballer (talk) was the original reviewer. I notice that he has a {{user mental health}} tag on his page, so he might not be up for re-reviewing.

ERcheck (talk) 01:16, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tenpop421 (talk · contribs) was the original reviewer. I have reviewed the nomination, but ALT0 still has problems. Good to go with one of the other ALTs though. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 01:57, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I addressed the issues you identified. Updated the fn for ALT0 and fixed fn6. Thanks! — ERcheck (talk) 03:58, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Infoboxes by displayed size?

[edit]

Hi, would it be a moderately simple task to create a bot generated list of infoboxes in articles by displayed size (ie number of displayed lines including collapsed text opened), for infoboxes generally and for specific templates (eg Template: Infobox military conflict or Template: Infobox person. The purpose would be to identify and addressing some of our most bloated infoboxes? Cinderella157 (talk) 02:27, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Olympic Village (Paris)

[edit]

The article Olympic Village (Paris) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Olympic Village (Paris) for comments about the article, and Talk:Olympic Village (Paris)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of DrOrinScrivello -- DrOrinScrivello (talk) 18:43, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Changes made to Bombardment of Greytown

[edit]

Hello, Hawkeye,

I have just made some changes to my B-level expansion of the Bombardment of Greytown, to which you made input early on. My changes were inspired somewhat by suggestions from an editor named Historyguy1138. He and I have come to a meeting of the minds. The changes and additions are mostly mine and have been approved by him. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Historyguy1138&diff=prev&oldid=1288574147

The bulk of the changes involve my replacing the five initial paragraphs of the Prelude section with five new paragraphs. Then I added four graphs to the end of the article in two new sections: Post Bombardment Central America and Greytown’s Ultimate Fate. (The other changes are much smaller and described in the edit summaries for them.)

Thanks for all your previous input, and I hope you like the changes. I have sent similar notifications to Donner60 and Grutness. Once I’ve heard back from all three of you and resolved any problems you’ve noticed, I am going to embark on an effort to increase the number of images in the article. I will inform you and the others when those additions are complete. Will-DubDub (talk) 19:31, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2025-19

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 00:12, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

TFA

[edit]
story · music · places

Thank you today for William D. Leahy, about "America's most senior military officer during World War II, but probably the least well known of the seven five-star officers. Despite (or perhaps because of this) there is a fair bit of scholarship about him. He is the subject of four PhD theses used in the article."! -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:32, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

... and today for American logistics in the Western Allied invasion of Germany, introduced (in 2023): "This is the final article in the series about logistics in the campaigns in north west Europe in 1944-1945. This one covers the American logistics in the final advance into Germany in 1945. It covers a longer period of time and a larger body of troops than previous articles. In writing the article, I was able to take into account reviewer comments on previous articles in the series from the time of article creation. The article follows operations closely, and incorporates recent scholarship. It uses a broad range of sources. Interest in World War II is waning as it recedes further into history, and the Central Europe campaign has never attracted its fair share of attention. The article has nice maps and some striking images. From a logistical point of view, the US Army had incorporated the lessons of the earlier campaigns and operated with a heightened degree of efficiency. In contrast to the campaigns of 1944, logistical issues had little impact on operations, partly because the armies operated with a greater awareness of them."! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:13, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Recommended reading today: Christfried Schmidt, a story about patience. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:20, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Operation Matterhorn

[edit]

The article Operation Matterhorn you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Operation Matterhorn for comments about the article, and Talk:Operation Matterhorn/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Matarisvan -- Matarisvan (talk) 19:23, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

New Wikipedian | Grammmer Correction and Format Checking

[edit]

Hi am new in wikipedia, can you help me to make this draft proper Draft:Vastav.AI Thank you SkyBaron (talk) 19:39, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Mic-drop!

[edit]

As we pause to remember our former colleague Essjay

😁 Classic! 👍 Fortuna, Imperatrix Mundi 11:04, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue 229, May 2025

[edit]
Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:06, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DYK reviewing of Robert Allen Norris?

[edit]

Hi @Hawkeye7. I'm a relative novice at DYK reviewing. Question: As I made edits to Robert Allen Norris, am I permitted to do the DYK review? — ERcheck (talk) 01:54, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WP:DYKRR: You're not allowed to approve your own hook or article. If you only make minor adjustments to another editor's proposed hook (no new facts requiring verification are introduced), you can still approve it. Substantial changes require a third-party reviewer. I am unsure what constitutes substantial changes. Ask this question at WT:DYK. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 04:30, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. I did ask the question at WT:DYK and got essentially the same feedback. As no new facts were introduced, and the structure of the article was not changed, I felt that my edits fell into the "minor" category, so did the review. I did disclose in my review that I made the edits. In addition, I made one suggestion for an alternate hook. — ERcheck (talk) 16:17, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This Month in GLAM: April 2025

[edit]




Headlines
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

Tech News: 2025-20

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 22:35, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

RfC

[edit]

WP:MOSBIO has an RfC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. MWFwiki (talk) 00:20, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]