-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 66
Specification status report for TPAC 2020
Marcos Cáceres edited this page Feb 24, 2021
·
1 revision
- New functionality
- added transaction durability option, per discussion at TPAC 2019 #50
- Supported in Chrome and Edge
- added transaction durability option, per discussion at TPAC 2019 #50
- Other normative changes
- remove File lastModifiedDate references, per discussion at TPAC 2019 #215
- specify that read-only transactions can run in parallel but block a later read/write transaction from starting, and the read/write transactions similarly block later read/write and read-only transactions, matching implementations #253
- disallow proxies as keys, matching implementations. #309
- make transactions inactive during the value clone process, to prevent side effects (e.g. getters) from re-entering algorithms.
- Spec quality
Pending changes:
- New functionality
- (has PR) IDBObjectStore putAll() per TPAC 2019 discussion - Chrome has implementation experience, but no data ready to share yet.
- (has PR) Manual commit per TPAC 2019 discussion - no implementation plans I'm aware of.
- (has PR) IDBObjectStore / IDBIndex getAllEntries() per TPAC 2019 discussion - no implementation plans I'm aware of.
- (has PR) IDBCursor close() per TPAC 2019 discussion - no implementation plans I'm aware of.
- Spec quality
- (has PR) Define Indexed DB as a storage endpoint, per Storage, and integrate with "bottles" terms, etc.
Seems premature:
- Goals for V3 in charter state "The third edition adds new capabilities and improves developer ergonomics by using promises." KV-Storage as a Promise-based layer on top of Indexed DB has stalled. An alternative is to push on low-level support in Indexed DB (example) and encourage libraries to implement Promise support.
- Overall, new functionality since V2 is limited: see https://w3c.github.io/IndexedDB/#revision-history
-
databases()
method #31,commit()
method #234,request
attribute #255,durability
option #50
-
How to unblock:
- IMHO, at least one more "big" feature is needed (e.g. one of the above PRs) to justify the effort
- Need further implementation experience
- Any other interested editors? Both current editors are from Chromium-based browsers.
- Need a WD published at least.