Replies: 7 comments 1 reply
-
Using Packages for Ebooks/Other Special PublicationsYeah?
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Holy fuck I didn't realize Discussions also had Issue numbers........................................................ |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
GitHub's Official Support Community Forum |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Manubot!!Honestly I can't remember if I've encountered Manubot before.... But it certainly seems to embody everything I would argue for in a please modernize academic publishing argument. From "Open collaborative writing with Manubot": Abstract
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
MacStories on Editorial Git in iOS |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
"The New GitHub Issues"
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
"Enhanced support for citations on GitHub | The GitHub Blog" Aug 19, 2021 at 12:00Making it easier for others to cite your workGitHub now has built-in support for Why we think this mattersFrom real time dashboards tracking the global impact of COVID-19 to the software used to take the first ever image of a black hole, academics and researchers are responsible for some of the highest-impact work GitHub has the privilege of hosting. Unfortunately, many researchers who devote significant time and effort producing high-quality open source software often find it hard to receive recognition for their work and suffer a career penalty within academia as a result. Yet the peer reviewed nature of open source makes it an ideal way to share research by providing example implementations, tests and datasets. The ability of researchers to be acknowledged for their open source contributions depends upon the ability of others to easily cite their work when they make use of it. We want to make these experiences easier for researchers and developers alike. How this worksUnder the hood, we’re using the We’d love your feedback and help!Software citation in academia is still relatively new and, as such, we’re expecting that some modifications and enhancements will be required as we mature this feature with the help and feedback of the research community. We’ve been testing the feature with the CFF (Citation File Format) creators2 and a small number of beta testers. Join us in the 1 Note we also detect citation files used by some communities (e.g., 2 Stephan Druskat, German Aerospace Center (DLR), Berlin, Germany; Jurriaan Spaaks, Netherlands eScience Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7064-4069; Robert Haines, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK -"Enhanced support for citations on GitHub | The GitHub Blog" |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Using Git for the whole editorial process - correspondence, notetaking, drafting, revising, editorializing, promoting, discussing, and even reflecting.
(I just updated this repo's About section with that.)
Essential reading on using Git for the writing process
This is likely to really end up being a list of ideas regarding using Git for writing, generally. (See #44)
Specifically about Discussions just looking at it now: considering support for mentions @extratone and Issues #85 (lol,) I think these have some serious, as-yet-untapped potential to compete in the forums platform space.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions