Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Editorial
. 2017 Jul;58(7):859-861.
doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12706.

Editorial Perspective: The use of person-first language in scholarly writing may accentuate stigma

Affiliations
Editorial

Editorial Perspective: The use of person-first language in scholarly writing may accentuate stigma

Morton Ann Gernsbacher. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2017 Jul.

Abstract

Numerous style guides, including those issued by the American Psychological and the American Psychiatric Associations, prescribe that writers use only person-first language so that nouns referring to persons (e.g. children) always precede phrases referring to characteristics (e.g. children with typical development). Person-first language is based on the premise that everyone, regardless of whether they have a disability, is a person-first, and therefore everyone should be referred to with person-first language. However, my analysis of scholarly writing suggests that person-first language is used more frequently to refer to children with disabilities than to refer to children without disabilities; person-first language is more frequently used to refer to children with disabilities than adults with disabilities; and person-first language is most frequently used to refer to children with the most stigmatized disabilities. Therefore, the use of person-first language in scholarly writing may actually accentuate stigma rather than attenuate it. Recommendations are forwarded for language use that may reduce stigma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author has declared that she has no competing or potential financial interests in the research reported in this article.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. American Medical Association. AMA manual of style: A guide for authors and editors. 10th. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2007.
    1. American Psychological Association. Publication manual of the American Psychological Association. 6th. Washington, DC: Author; 2010.
    1. Andrews EE, Kuemmel A, Williams JL, Pilarski CR, Dunn M, Lund EM. Providing culturally competent supervision to trainees with disabilities in rehabilitation settings. Rehabilitation Psychology. 2013;58:233–244. - PubMed
    1. Burgdorf RL., Jr The Americans with Disabilities Act: Analysis and implications of a second-generation civil rights statute. Harvard Civil Rights Civil Liberties Law Review. 1991;26:413–522.
    1. Gernsbacher MA. Analyses of person-first language in scholarly writing: Technical report. Open Science Framework. 2016 doi: 10.17605/OSF.IO/982AJ. Advanced online publication. - DOI

Publication types