Overall: Article was nominated for DYK shortly after GA promotion—congratulations on that—and is certainly long enough. Earwig found no instance of plagiarism. The hook is cited and interesting; my two cents for its prose would perhaps be "called a judge an 'absentee' office holder" or just "an 'absentee'"—however, the existing hook is already pretty straightforward as is. The picture is in the public domain, used in the article's infobox, and is clear even at a smaller size. Submitter fulfilled their QPQ obligation. Everything looks great to me! Phibeatrice (talk) 20:36, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
Article was nominated for DYK shortly after GA promotion—congratulations on that—and is certainly long enough. Earwig found no instance of plagiarism. The hook is cited and interesting; my two cents for its prose would perhaps be "called a judge an 'absentee' office holder" or just "an 'absentee'"—however, the existing hook is already pretty straightforward as is. The picture is in the public domain, used in the article's infobox, and is clear even at a smaller size. Submitter fulfilled their QPQ obligation. Everything looks great to me! Phibeatrice (talk) 20:36, 8 May 2025 (UTC)