1,2,3 = 2,3,4: a solution to the problem of the homology of the digits in the avian hand
- PMID: 10220427
- PMCID: PMC21825
- DOI: 10.1073/pnas.96.9.5111
1,2,3 = 2,3,4: a solution to the problem of the homology of the digits in the avian hand
Abstract
Persistent contradictions in well supported empirical findings usually point to important scientific problems and may even lead to exciting new insights. One of the most enduring problems in evolutionary biology is the apparent conflict between paleontological and embryological evidence regarding the homology of the digits in the avian hand (1, 2). We propose that this problem highlights an important feature of morphological change: namely, the possible dissociation between the developmental origin of a particular repeated element and its subsequent individualization into a fully functional character. We argue that, although comparative embryological evidence correctly identifies the homology of the primordial condensations in avians as CII, CIII, and CIV, subsequent anatomical differentiation reflects a frame shift in the developmental identities of the avian digit anlagen in later ontogeny such that CII becomes DI, CIII becomes DII, and CIV becomes DIII.
Figures






Comment in
-
1,2,3 = 2,3,4: accommodating the cladogram.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Apr 27;96(9):4740-2. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.9.4740. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999. PMID: 10220360 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
The developmental evolution of avian digit homology: an update.Theory Biosci. 2005 Nov;124(2):165-83. doi: 10.1007/BF02814482. Epub 2005 Sep 12. Theory Biosci. 2005. PMID: 17046354 Review.
-
Thumbs down: a molecular-morphogenetic approach to avian digit homology.J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol. 2014 Jan;322(1):1-12. doi: 10.1002/jez.b.22545. Epub 2013 Oct 29. J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol. 2014. PMID: 24323741
-
Finding the frame shift: digit loss, developmental variability, and the origin of the avian hand.Evol Dev. 2011 May-Jun;13(3):269-79. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-142X.2011.00478.x. Evol Dev. 2011. PMID: 21535465
-
Identity of the avian wing digits: problems resolved and unsolved.Dev Dyn. 2011 May;240(5):1042-53. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.22595. Epub 2011 Mar 15. Dev Dyn. 2011. PMID: 21412936 Review.
-
Why ontogenetic homology criteria can be misleading: lessons from digit identity transformations.J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol. 2011 May 15;316B(3):165-70. doi: 10.1002/jez.b.21396. Epub 2011 Jan 11. J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol. 2011. PMID: 21462311
Cited by
-
A Logical Model of Homology for Comparative Biology.Syst Biol. 2020 Mar 1;69(2):345-362. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syz067. Syst Biol. 2020. PMID: 31596473 Free PMC article.
-
Evolution of the avian digital pattern.Sci Rep. 2019 Jun 12;9(1):8560. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-44913-w. Sci Rep. 2019. PMID: 31189916 Free PMC article.
-
Tracing the evolution of avian wing digits.Curr Biol. 2013 Jun 17;23(12):R538-44. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2013.04.071. Curr Biol. 2013. PMID: 23787052 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Theories, laws, and models in evo-devo.J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol. 2022 Jan;338(1-2):36-61. doi: 10.1002/jez.b.23096. Epub 2021 Sep 27. J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol. 2022. PMID: 34570438 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Spiders did not repeatedly gain, but repeatedly lost, foraging webs.PeerJ. 2019 Apr 4;7:e6703. doi: 10.7717/peerj.6703. eCollection 2019. PeerJ. 2019. PMID: 30976470 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Burke A C, Feduccia A. Science. 1997;278:666–668.
-
- Gauthier J. Mem California Acad Sci. 1986;8:1–55.
-
- Meckel J F. System der vergleichenden Anatomie. Halle, Germany: Rengersche Buchhandlung; 1821.
-
- Owen R. In: The Cyclopaedia of Anatomy and Physiology. Todd R B, editor. Vol. 1. Gilbert and Pipen, London: Sherwood; 1836. pp. 265–358.
-
- Hinchliffe J R, Hecht M. Evol Biol. 1984;20:21–37.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources