Resuscitation after prolonged ventricular fibrillation with use of monophasic and biphasic waveform pulses for external defibrillation
- PMID: 10869271
- DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.101.25.2968
Resuscitation after prolonged ventricular fibrillation with use of monophasic and biphasic waveform pulses for external defibrillation
Abstract
Background: Survival after prolonged ventricular fibrillation (VF) appears severely limited by 2 major factors: (1) low defibrillation success rates and (2) persistent post-countershock myocardial dysfunction. Biphasic (BP) waveforms may prove capable of favorably modifying these limitations. However, they have not been rigorously tested against monophasic (MP) waveforms in clinical models of external defibrillation, particularly where rescue from prolonged VF is the general rule.
Methods and results: We randomized 26 dogs to external countershocks with either MP or BP waveforms. Hemodynamics were assessed after shocks applied during sinus rhythm, after brief VF (>10 seconds), and after resuscitation from prolonged VF (>10 minutes). Short-term differences in percent change in left ventricular +dP/dt(max) (MP -16+/-28%, BP +9.1+/-24%; P=0.03) and left ventricular -dP/dt(max) (MP -37+/-26%, BP -18+/-20%; P=0.05) were present after rescue from brief VF, with BP animals exhibiting less countershock-induced dysfunction. After prolonged VF, the BP group had lower mean defibrillation thresholds (107+/-57 versus 172+/-88 J for MP, P=0.04) and significantly shorter resuscitation times (397+/-73.7 versus 488+/-74.3 seconds for MP, P=0.03).
Conclusions: External defibrillation is more efficacious with BP countershocks than with MP countershocks. The lower defibrillation thresholds and shorter resuscitation times associated with BP waveform defibrillation may improve survival after prolonged VF arrest.
Similar articles
-
The effects of biphasic and conventional monophasic defibrillation on postresuscitation myocardial function.J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999 Sep;34(3):815-22. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(99)00270-3. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999. PMID: 10483965
-
A comparison of biphasic and monophasic waveform defibrillation after prolonged ventricular fibrillation.Chest. 2001 Sep;120(3):948-54. doi: 10.1378/chest.120.3.948. Chest. 2001. PMID: 11555534
-
Monophasic versus biphasic transthoracic countershock after prolonged ventricular fibrillation in a swine model.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000 Sep;36(3):932-8. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(00)00781-6. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000. PMID: 10987622
-
Biphasic versus monophasic waveforms for transthoracic defibrillation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Feb 10;2(2):CD006762. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006762.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016. PMID: 26904970 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Low-energy biphasic waveform defibrillation reduces the severity of postresuscitation myocardial dysfunction.Crit Care Med. 2000 Nov;28(11 Suppl):N222-4. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200011001-00014. Crit Care Med. 2000. PMID: 11098952 Review.
Cited by
-
Targeted Delivery of Electrical Shocks and Epinephrine, Guided by Ventricular Fibrillation Amplitude Spectral Area, Reduces Electrical and Adrenergic Myocardial Burden, Improving Survival in Swine.J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Dec 7;10(23):e023956. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.023956. Epub 2021 Nov 8. J Am Heart Assoc. 2021. PMID: 34743550 Free PMC article.
-
Orthostatic increase in defibrillation threshold leading to defibrillation failure and prolonged cardiac arrest in a sitting position: Lessons from a patient's near-fatal experience.HeartRhythm Case Rep. 2016 Mar 28;2(4):313-317. doi: 10.1016/j.hrcr.2016.03.005. eCollection 2016 Jul. HeartRhythm Case Rep. 2016. PMID: 28491699 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Real-Time Ventricular Fibrillation Amplitude-Spectral Area Analysis to Guide Timing of Shock Delivery Improves Defibrillation Efficacy During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Swine.J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Nov 4;6(11):e006749. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.006749. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017. PMID: 29102980 Free PMC article.
-
A multicenter prospective randomized study comparing the efficacy of escalating higher biphasic versus low biphasic energy defibrillations in patients presenting with cardiac arrest in the in-hospital environment.Open Access Emerg Med. 2017 Jan 13;9:9-17. doi: 10.2147/OAEM.S109339. eCollection 2017. Open Access Emerg Med. 2017. PMID: 28144168 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of low-energy versus high-energy biphasic defibrillation shocks following prolonged ventricular fibrillation.Prehosp Emerg Care. 2010 Jan-Mar;14(1):62-70. doi: 10.3109/10903120903349838. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2010. PMID: 19947869 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources