Interacting with notebook input devices: an analysis of motor performance and users' expertise
- PMID: 15960095
- DOI: 10.1518/0018720053653893
Interacting with notebook input devices: an analysis of motor performance and users' expertise
Abstract
In the present study the usability of two different types of notebook input devices was examined. The independent variables were input device (touchpad vs. mini-joystick) and user expertise (expert vs. novice state). There were 30 participants, of whom 15 were touchpad experts and the other 15 were mini-joystick experts. The experimental tasks were a point-click task (Experiment 1) and a point-drag-drop task (Experiment 2). Dependent variables were the time and accuracy of cursor control. To assess carryover effects, we had the participants complete both experiments, using not only the input device for which they were experts but also the device for which they were novices. Results showed the touchpad performance to be clearly superior to mini-joystick performance. Overall, experts showed better performance than did novices. The significant interaction of input device and expertise showed that the use of an unknown device is difficult, but only for touchpad experts, who were remarkably slower and less accurate when using a mini-joystick. Actual and potential applications of this research include an evaluation of current notebook input devices. The outcomes allow ergonomic guidelines to be derived for optimized usage and design of the mini-joystick and touchpad devices.
Similar articles
-
Notebook input devices put to the age test: the usability of trackpoint and touchpad for middle-aged adults.Ergonomics. 2007 Mar;50(3):426-45. doi: 10.1080/00140130601127885. Ergonomics. 2007. PMID: 17536778
-
Sensumotor transformation of input devices and the impact on practice and task difficulty.Ergonomics. 2007 Dec;50(12):1999-2016. doi: 10.1080/00140130701510147. Ergonomics. 2007. PMID: 18033612
-
Practice and carryover effects when using small interaction devices.Appl Ergon. 2011 Mar;42(3):437-44. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2010.09.001. Appl Ergon. 2011. PMID: 20934683 Clinical Trial.
-
Effects of input device and motion type on a cursor-positioning task.Percept Mot Skills. 2008 Feb;106(1):76-90. doi: 10.2466/pms.106.1.76-90. Percept Mot Skills. 2008. PMID: 18459358
-
Perceptual-motor performance and associated kinematics in space.Hum Factors. 2008 Dec;50(6):879-92. doi: 10.1518/001872008X374965. Hum Factors. 2008. PMID: 19292011 Review.
Cited by
-
The role of expertise research and human factors in capturing, explaining, and producing superior performance.Hum Factors. 2008 Jun;50(3):427-32. doi: 10.1518/001872008X312206. Hum Factors. 2008. PMID: 18689049 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
