Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2010 Jul 7;277(1690):1937-46.
doi: 10.1098/rspb.2010.0001. Epub 2010 Mar 10.

Atmospheric oxygen level and the evolution of insect body size

Affiliations
Review

Atmospheric oxygen level and the evolution of insect body size

Jon F Harrison et al. Proc Biol Sci. .

Abstract

Insects are small relative to vertebrates, possibly owing to limitations or costs associated with their blind-ended tracheal respiratory system. The giant insects of the late Palaeozoic occurred when atmospheric PO(2) (aPO(2)) was hyperoxic, supporting a role for oxygen in the evolution of insect body size. The paucity of the insect fossil record and the complex interactions between atmospheric oxygen level, organisms and their communities makes it impossible to definitively accept or reject the historical oxygen-size link, and multiple alternative hypotheses exist. However, a variety of recent empirical findings support a link between oxygen and insect size, including: (i) most insects develop smaller body sizes in hypoxia, and some develop and evolve larger sizes in hyperoxia; (ii) insects developmentally and evolutionarily reduce their proportional investment in the tracheal system when living in higher aPO(2), suggesting that there are significant costs associated with tracheal system structure and function; and (iii) larger insects invest more of their body in the tracheal system, potentially leading to greater effects of aPO(2) on larger insects. Together, these provide a wealth of plausible mechanisms by which tracheal oxygen delivery may be centrally involved in setting the relatively small size of insects and for hyperoxia-enabled Palaeozoic gigantism.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Various patterns of modelled aPO2 over the Phanerozoic. Solid line (Berner & Canfield 1989), dotted line (Berner 2006b), dashed line (Bergman et al. 2004).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Plausible mechanisms by which atmospheric oxygen partial pressure (aPO2) might affect the evolution of insect size. Straight arrows indicate positive correlations, dashed negative, and both arrows together indicate nonlinear effects. Circles next to a trait indicate empirical support for an effect of hypoxia (open circles), or both hypoxia and hyperoxia (semi-filled circles) in Drosophila melanogaster. At the individual level (a), changes in aPO2 result in changes in internal PO2 that are damped relative to the environment owing to changes in the resistance of the tracheal system. Changing tracheal system resistance affects water loss rates, altering fitness in some environments. Internal PO2 causes direct, acute effects (left box), altering levels of oxidative stress and affecting performance variables such as flight or feeding. Changes in performance can directly affect fitness; for example, changing agility might improve foraging or the ability to escape predators. Internal PO2 also causes developmental effects (right box) via oxygen-sensitive signalling systems that control development time, cell size and number, that then affect body size and fitness. Developmental processes allow compensatory changes in respiratory structures; altering relative investment in non-respiratory structures such as muscles and ovaries that may affect fitness. The within-individual effects may influence average or maximal size of all or just the largest species. Some of the multiple possibilities include (b) alterations in abundance that affect the range but not mean size, (c) evolutionary shifts in mean size that increase over generations owing to size*aPO2 interactions or (d) effects only on the largest individuals or species, such as relief of a constraint on maximal size. Over multiple generations, individuals within the new population cycle through the changed aPO2, causing enhanced evolution of body size.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Allen C. R., Garmestani A. F., Havlicek T. D., Marquet P. A., Peterson P. D., Restrepo C., Stow C. A., Weeks B. E.2006Patterns in body size distributions: sifting among alternative hypotheses. Ecol. Lett. 9, 630–648 (doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00902.x) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bailey S. M., Xu J., Feng J. H., Hu X., Zhang C., Qui S.2007Tradeoffs between oxygen and energy in tibial growth at high altitude. Am. J. Hum. Biol. 19, 662–668 (doi:10.1002/ajhb.20667) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Beckemeyer R. J., Hall J. D.2007The entomofauna of the lower Permian fossil insect beds of Kansas and Oklahoma, USA. Afr. Invertebrates 48, 23–39
    1. Bergman N. M., Lenton T. M., Watson A. J.2004COPSE: a new model of biogeochemical cycling over Phanaerozoic time. Am. J. Sci. 304, 397–437 (doi:10.2475/ajs.304.5.397) - DOI
    1. Berner R. A.2005The carbon and sulfur cycles and atmospheric oxygen from middle Permian to middle Triassic. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 69, 3211–3217 (doi:10.1016/j.gca.2005.03.021) - DOI

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources