Implantation failure: molecular mechanisms and clinical treatment
- PMID: 20729534
- PMCID: PMC3039220
- DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmq037
Implantation failure: molecular mechanisms and clinical treatment
Abstract
Background: Implantation is a complex initial step in the establishment of a successful pregnancy. Although embryo quality is an important determinant of implantation, temporally coordinated differentiation of endometrial cells to attain uterine receptivity and a synchronized dialog between maternal and embryonic tissues are crucial. The exact mechanism of implantation failure is still poorly understood.
Methods: This review summarizes the current knowledge about the proposed mechanisms of implantation failure in gynecological diseases, the evaluation of endometrial receptivity and the treatment methods to improve implantation.
Results: The absence or suppression of molecules essential for endometrial receptivity results in decreased implantation rates in animal models and gynecological diseases, including endometriosis, hydrosalpinx, leiomyoma and polycystic ovarian syndrome. The mechanisms are diverse and include abnormal cytokine and hormonal signaling as well as epigenetic alterations.
Conclusions: Optimizing endometrial receptivity in fertility treatment will improve success rates. Evaluation of implantation markers may help to predict pregnancy outcome and detect occult implantation deficiency. Treating the underlying gynecological disease with medical or surgical interventions is the optimal current therapy. Manipulating the expression of key endometrial genes with gene or stem cell-based therapies may some day be used to further improve implantation rates.
Similar articles
-
Uterine receptivity: alterations associated with benign gynecological disease.Semin Reprod Med. 2007 Nov;25(6):461-75. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-991044. Semin Reprod Med. 2007. PMID: 17960531 Review.
-
Comparing endometrial receptivity array to histologic dating of the endometrium in women with a history of implantation failure.Syst Biol Reprod Med. 2020 Dec;66(6):347-354. doi: 10.1080/19396368.2020.1824032. Epub 2020 Sep 30. Syst Biol Reprod Med. 2020. PMID: 32998580
-
Identifying biomarkers for predicting successful embryo implantation: applying single to multi-OMICs to improve reproductive outcomes.Hum Reprod Update. 2020 Feb 28;26(2):264-301. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmz042. Hum Reprod Update. 2020. PMID: 32096829 Review.
-
Endometrium in women with polycystic ovary syndrome during the window of implantation.Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2011 Nov-Dec;57(6):702-9. doi: 10.1590/s0104-42302011000600020. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2011. PMID: 22249553 Review. English, Portuguese.
-
Development of a new comprehensive and reliable endometrial receptivity map (ER Map/ER Grade) based on RT-qPCR gene expression analysis.Hum Reprod. 2018 Feb 1;33(2):220-228. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex370. Hum Reprod. 2018. PMID: 29315421
Cited by
-
Nuclear receptor coactivator-6 attenuates uterine estrogen sensitivity to permit embryo implantation.Dev Cell. 2012 Oct 16;23(4):858-65. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2012.09.002. Dev Cell. 2012. PMID: 23079602 Free PMC article.
-
Toll-like 4 receptor /NFκB inflammatory/miR-146a pathway contributes to the ART-correlated preterm birth outcome.Oncotarget. 2016 Nov 8;7(45):72475-72485. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.11987. Oncotarget. 2016. PMID: 27636999 Free PMC article.
-
MiR-148a-3p may contribute to flawed decidualization in recurrent implantation failure by modulating HOXC8.J Assist Reprod Genet. 2020 Oct;37(10):2535-2544. doi: 10.1007/s10815-020-01900-9. Epub 2020 Aug 8. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2020. PMID: 32772270 Free PMC article.
-
Bi-potential hPSC-derived Müllerian duct-like cells for full-thickness and functional endometrium regeneration.NPJ Regen Med. 2022 Nov 23;7(1):68. doi: 10.1038/s41536-022-00263-2. NPJ Regen Med. 2022. PMID: 36418304 Free PMC article.
-
Integrin β1 coordinates survival and morphogenesis of the embryonic lineage upon implantation and pluripotency transition.Cell Rep. 2021 Mar 9;34(10):108834. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.108834. Cell Rep. 2021. PMID: 33691117 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Akbas GE, Song J, Taylor HS. A HOXA10 estrogen response element (ERE) is differentially regulated by 17 beta-estradiol and diethylstilbestrol (DES) J Mol Biol. 2004;340:1013–1023. - PubMed
-
- Alam V, Bernardini L, Gonzales J, Asch RH, Balmaceda JP. A prospective study of echographic endometrial characteristics and pregnancy rates during hormonal replacement cycles. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1993;10:215–219. doi:10.1007/BF01239224. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Andersen AN, Yue Z, Meng FJ, Petersen K. Low implantation rate after in-vitro fertilization in patients with hydrosalpinges diagnosed by ultrasonography. Hum Reprod. 1994;9:1935–1938. - PubMed
-
- Andersen AN, Gianaroli L, Felberbaum R, de Mouzon J, Nygren KG. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2001. Results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Hum Reprod. 2005;20:1158–1176. - PubMed
-
- Apparao KB, Lovely LP, Gui Y, Lininger RA, Lessey BA. Elevated endometrial androgen receptor expression in women with polycystic ovarian syndrome. Biol Reprod. 2002;66:297–304. doi:10.1095/biolreprod66.2.297. - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical