Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2010 Nov-Dec;1(3):376-87.
doi: 10.1002/wrna.34.

DNA rearrangements directed by non-coding RNAs in ciliates

Affiliations
Review

DNA rearrangements directed by non-coding RNAs in ciliates

Kazufumi Mochizuki. Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA. 2010 Nov-Dec.

Abstract

Extensive programmed rearrangement of DNA, including DNA elimination, chromosome fragmentation, and DNA unscrambling, takes place in the newly developed macronucleus during the sexual reproduction of ciliated protozoa. Recent studies have revealed that two distant classes of ciliates use distinct types of non-coding RNAs to regulate such DNA rearrangement events. DNA elimination in Tetrahymena is regulated by small non-coding RNAs that are produced and utilized in an RNA interference (RNAi)-related process. It has been proposed that the small RNAs produced from the micronuclear genome are used to identify eliminated DNA sequences by whole-genome comparison between the parental macronucleus and the micronucleus. In contrast, DNA unscrambling in Oxytricha is guided by long non-coding RNAs that are produced from the parental macronuclear genome. These long RNAs are proposed to act as templates for the direct unscrambling events that occur in the developing macronucleus. Both cases provide useful examples to study epigenetic chromatin regulation by non-coding RNAs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Nuclear dimorphism in Tetrahymena
Like most ciliates, Tetrahymena thermophila (picture) has two different types of nuclei (highlighted in red) in a single cell: a macronucleus (Mac) and a micronucleus (Mic). The micronucleus has five chromosomes per haploid genome whereas the macronucleus has over 20,000 chromosomes.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Life cycle of Tetrahymena
When enough nutrients are available, vegetative Tetrahymena cells multiply by binary fission and the macronucleus and micronucleus divide independently (A). After prolonged starvation, two cells of complementary mating types fuse to start the sexual reproduction process of conjugation (B). Their micronuclei undergo meiosis (C) and one of the meiotic products survives and divides mitotically, giving rise to two gametic nuclei, one of which is stationary and the other migratory (D). The migratory gametic nucleus crosses the conjugation bridge (E) and the gametic nuclei fuse to produce a diploid zygotic nucleus (F). The zygotic nucleus undergoes two mitotic divisions (G), and two of the products differentiate as macronuclei while the other two differentiate as micronuclei (H). The parental macronucleus becomes pyknotic and is resorbed. Finally, the pairing dissolves and the progeny resume vegetative growth when nutrients are available again (F).
Figure 3
Figure 3. DNA rearrangement and endoreplication in ciliates
(A) DNA elimination and chromosome fragmentation in Tetrahymena. Numerous internal eliminated sequences (IESs, green lines marked with the letter “i”) are removed and two flanking macronuclear-destined sequences are re-ligated. In parallel, chromosome breakage at the Cbs (chromosome breakage sequence, marked with an arrow and the letter “c”) occurs and new telomeres (red triangles) are formed. The macronuclear chromosomes are eventually endoreplicated to around 50 copies. (B) rDNA rearrangement in Tetrahymena. The single micronuclear rDNA locus (blue arrow) is excised and rearranged into an inverted repeat. Telomeres are formed at both ends de novo and endoreplicated to approximately 10,000 copies. (C) DNA descrambling in spirotrich ciliates (e. g., Oxytricha). Many genes are fragmented, “scrambled” (that is, not 1-2-3-4-5-6 but 1-3-2-4-5-6, in this example) and some segments are inverted (segment 5 in this example) and separated by IESs (green lines marked with “i”) in the micronucleus (Mic). They are joined and assembled (descrambled) into the proper order and direction in the macronucleus (Mac).
Figure 4
Figure 4. Elimination of transposon repeats from the macronucleus
Tetrahymena cells in a vegetative state were used to detect two distinct transposon-related sequences, Tlr1 (top) and REP (bottom), by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH, green, left). DNA was stained with DAPI (magenta, middle). The micronucleus (i) and the macronucleus (a) are marked.
Figure 5
Figure 5. A model for small RNA-directed DNA rearrangement in Tetrahymena
In the early conjugation stages, the genome of the micronucleus (Mic), including the IESs, is transcribed bi-directionally (A) and the resulting transcripts form dsRNA molecules (B). The dsRNAs are processed into small RNAs (scnRNAs) (C). The scnRNAs are transferred to the parental macronucleus (Mac) and any scnRNAs homologous to DNA sequences in the parental Mac are degraded in the mid-conjugation stages (D). In late conjugation stages, the scnRNAs that were not degraded in the parental Mac (those homologous to IESs) are transferred to the developing new Mac (E), where they target IESs to be eliminated by base pairing (F).
Figure 6
Figure 6. Small RNA-directed DNA rearrangement in Tetrahymena
Events occurring sequentially are shown from top to bottom. The approximate stages at which the events occur are indicated on the right by arrows. See text for details. Mic: micronucleus, Mac: Macronucleus.
Figure 7
Figure 7. Long non-coding RNA-guided DNA descrambling in Oxytricha
(A) A model for RNA-guided DNA descrambling in Oxytricha. Telomere-to-telomere transcription of parental macronuclear “gene-sized” chromosomes produces guide RNAs (wavy lines with circles), which are then transported to the newly developed macronucleus where they act as scaffolds to guide DNA rearrangement. (B) Disruption of long non-coding RNAs by RNAi causes a defect in DNA rearrangement. (C) Microinjection of artificial templates (in this example, RNA having a 1-2-4-3-5-6 sequence) alters the order of the DNA descrambling pattern in the new macronucleus. (D) Microinjection of artificial templates that have base substitutions (C to T in this example) alters the DNA sequence of the new macronucleus.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Prescott DM. The DNA of ciliated protozoa. Microbiol Rev. 1994;58:233–267. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Blackburn EH, Gall JG. A tandemly repeated sequence at the termini of the extrachromosomal ribosomal RNA genes in Tetrahymena. J Mol Biol. 1978;120:33–53. - PubMed
    1. Greider CW, Blackburn EH. Identification of a specific telomere terminal transferase activity in Tetrahymena extracts. Cell. 1985;43:405–413. - PubMed
    1. Collins K. Physiological assembly and activity of human telomerase complexes. Mech Ageing Dev. 2008;129:91–98. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cech TR, Rio DC. Localization of transcribed regions on extrachromosomal ribosomal RNA genes of Tetrahymena thermophila by R-loop mapping. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979;76:5051–5055. - PMC - PubMed

Further reading list

    1. Blackburn EH, Greider CW, Szostak JW. Telomeres and telomerase: the path from maize, Tetrahymena and yeast to human cancer and aging. Nature medicine. 2006;12:1133–1138. - PubMed
    1. Chalker DL. Dynamic nuclear reorganization during genome remodeling of Tetrahymena. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2008;1783:2130–2136. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Duharcourt S, Lepere G, Meyer E. Developmental genome rearrangements in ciliates: a natural genomic subtraction mediated by non-coding transcripts. Trends Genet. 2009;25:344–350. - PubMed
    1. Nowacki M, Landweber LF. Epigenetic inheritance in ciliates. Current opinion in microbiology. 2009;12:638–643. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources