Pit latrines and their impacts on groundwater quality: a systematic review
- PMID: 23518813
- PMCID: PMC3673197
- DOI: 10.1289/ehp.1206028
Pit latrines and their impacts on groundwater quality: a systematic review
Abstract
Background: Pit latrines are one of the most common human excreta disposal systems in low-income countries, and their use is on the rise as countries aim to meet the sanitation-related target of the Millennium Development Goals. There is concern, however, that discharges of chemical and microbial contaminants from pit latrines to groundwater may negatively affect human health.
Objectives: Our goals were to a) calculate global pit latrine coverage, b) systematically review empirical studies of the impacts of pit latrines on groundwater quality, c) evaluate latrine siting standards, and d) identify knowledge gaps regarding the potential for and consequences of groundwater contamination by latrines.
Methods: We used existing survey and population data to calculate global pit latrine coverage. We reviewed the scientific literature on the occurrence of contaminants originating from pit latrines and considered the factors affecting transport of these contaminants. Data were extracted from peer-reviewed articles, books, and reports identified using Web of ScienceSM, PubMed, Google, and document reference lists.
Discussion: We estimated that approximately 1.77 billion people use pit latrines as their primary means of sanitation. Studies of pit latrines and groundwater are limited and have generally focused on only a few indicator contaminants. Although groundwater contamination is frequently observed downstream of latrines, contaminant transport distances, recommendations based on empirical studies, and siting guidelines are variable and not well aligned with one another.
Conclusions: In order to improve environmental and human health, future research should examine a larger set of contextual variables, improve measurement approaches, and develop better criteria for siting pit latrines.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare they have no actual or potential competing financial interests.
Figures


Comment in
-
Pit latrines and groundwater contamination: negative impacts of a popular sanitation method.Environ Health Perspect. 2013 May;121(5):a169. doi: 10.1289/ehp.121-a169. Environ Health Perspect. 2013. PMID: 23635913 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Are pit latrines in urban areas of Sub-Saharan Africa performing? A review of usage, filling, insects and odour nuisances.BMC Public Health. 2016 Feb 4;16:120. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-2772-z. BMC Public Health. 2016. PMID: 26846125 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The pit latrine paradox in low-income settings: A sanitation technology of choice or a pollution hotspot?Sci Total Environ. 2023 Jun 25;879:163179. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.163179. Epub 2023 Mar 31. Sci Total Environ. 2023. PMID: 37003330 Review.
-
A survey of domestic wells and pit latrines in rural settlements of Mali: Implications of on-site sanitation on the quality of water supplies.Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2017 Oct;220(7):1179-1189. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2017.08.001. Epub 2017 Aug 4. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2017. PMID: 28807472
-
A spatial analysis of pit latrine density and groundwater source contamination.Environ Monit Assess. 2013 May;185(5):4261-72. doi: 10.1007/s10661-012-2866-8. Epub 2012 Sep 14. Environ Monit Assess. 2013. PMID: 22976120
-
Risk assessment to groundwater of pit latrine rural sanitation policy in developing country settings.Sci Total Environ. 2018 Feb 1;613-614:592-610. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.071. Epub 2017 Sep 26. Sci Total Environ. 2018. PMID: 28926813
Cited by
-
Influence of community-level sanitation coverage and population density on environmental fecal contamination and child health in a longitudinal cohort in rural Bangladesh.Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2022 Aug;245:114031. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2022.114031. Epub 2022 Sep 1. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2022. PMID: 36058111 Free PMC article.
-
Slum decay in Sub-Saharan Africa: Context, environmental pollution challenges, and impact on dweller's health.Environ Epidemiol. 2021 May 20;5(3):e158. doi: 10.1097/EE9.0000000000000158. eCollection 2021 Jun. Environ Epidemiol. 2021. PMID: 34131619 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
The Status of Sanitation in Malawi: Is SDG6.2 Achievable?Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Aug 5;20(15):6528. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20156528. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023. PMID: 37569068 Free PMC article.
-
Are pit latrines in urban areas of Sub-Saharan Africa performing? A review of usage, filling, insects and odour nuisances.BMC Public Health. 2016 Feb 4;16:120. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-2772-z. BMC Public Health. 2016. PMID: 26846125 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Sanitary condition and its microbiological quality of improved water sources in the Southern Region of Ethiopia.Environ Monit Assess. 2020 Apr 30;192(5):319. doi: 10.1007/s10661-020-08297-z. Environ Monit Assess. 2020. PMID: 32356229 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Ahmed KM, Khandkar ZZ, Lawrence AR, Macdonald DMJ, Islam MS. Appendix A: an investigation of the impact of on-site sanitation on the quality of groundwater supplies in two peri-urban areas of Dhaka, Bangladesh. In: Assessing Risk to Groundwater from On-site Sanitation: Scientific Review and Case Studies. Keyworth, UK:British Geological Survey, 37–67. 2002. Available: http://r4d.dfid.gov.uk/pdf/outputs/r68692.pdf [accessed 26 March 2013]
-
- Banerjee G. Underground pollution travel from leach pits of on-site sanitation facilities: a case study. Clean Technol Environ Policy. 2011;13(3):489–497.
-
- Banks D, Karnachuk OV, Parnachev VP, Holden W, Frengstad B. Groundwater contamination from rural pit latrines: examples from Siberia and Kosova. J Chartered Inst Water Environ Manage. 2002;16(2):147–152.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources