Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors versus placebo in patients with major depressive disorder. A systematic review with meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis
- PMID: 28178949
- PMCID: PMC5299662
- DOI: 10.1186/s12888-016-1173-2
Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors versus placebo in patients with major depressive disorder. A systematic review with meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis
Erratum in
-
Erratum to: Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors versus placebo in patients with major depressive disorder. A systematic review with meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis.BMC Psychiatry. 2017 May 3;17(1):162. doi: 10.1186/s12888-017-1311-5. BMC Psychiatry. 2017. PMID: 28468655 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Abstract
Background: The evidence on selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) for major depressive disorder is unclear.
Methods: Our objective was to conduct a systematic review assessing the effects of SSRIs versus placebo, 'active' placebo, or no intervention in adult participants with major depressive disorder. We searched for eligible randomised clinical trials in The Cochrane Library's CENTRAL, PubMed, EMBASE, PsycLIT, PsycINFO, Science Citation Index Expanded, clinical trial registers of Europe and USA, websites of pharmaceutical companies, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and the European Medicines Agency until January 2016. All data were extracted by at least two independent investigators. We used Cochrane systematic review methodology, Trial Sequential Analysis, and calculation of Bayes factor. An eight-step procedure was followed to assess if thresholds for statistical and clinical significance were crossed. Primary outcomes were reduction of depressive symptoms, remission, and adverse events. Secondary outcomes were suicides, suicide attempts, suicide ideation, and quality of life.
Results: A total of 131 randomised placebo-controlled trials enrolling a total of 27,422 participants were included. None of the trials used 'active' placebo or no intervention as control intervention. All trials had high risk of bias. SSRIs significantly reduced the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) at end of treatment (mean difference -1.94 HDRS points; 95% CI -2.50 to -1.37; P < 0.00001; 49 trials; Trial Sequential Analysis-adjusted CI -2.70 to -1.18); Bayes factor below predefined threshold (2.01*10-23). The effect estimate, however, was below our predefined threshold for clinical significance of 3 HDRS points. SSRIs significantly decreased the risk of no remission (RR 0.88; 95% CI 0.84 to 0.91; P < 0.00001; 34 trials; Trial Sequential Analysis adjusted CI 0.83 to 0.92); Bayes factor (1426.81) did not confirm the effect). SSRIs significantly increased the risks of serious adverse events (OR 1.37; 95% CI 1.08 to 1.75; P = 0.009; 44 trials; Trial Sequential Analysis-adjusted CI 1.03 to 1.89). This corresponds to 31/1000 SSRI participants will experience a serious adverse event compared with 22/1000 control participants. SSRIs also significantly increased the number of non-serious adverse events. There were almost no data on suicidal behaviour, quality of life, and long-term effects.
Conclusions: SSRIs might have statistically significant effects on depressive symptoms, but all trials were at high risk of bias and the clinical significance seems questionable. SSRIs significantly increase the risk of both serious and non-serious adverse events. The potential small beneficial effects seem to be outweighed by harmful effects.
Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42013004420.
Keywords: Depression; SSRI; Systematic review.
Figures












Comment in
-
Do not blame the SSRIs: blame the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale.Acta Neuropsychiatr. 2018 Oct;30(5):241-243. doi: 10.1017/neu.2017.6. Epub 2017 Mar 1. Acta Neuropsychiatr. 2018. PMID: 28245891 No abstract available.
-
Multiple possible inaccuracies cast doubt on a recent report suggesting selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors to be toxic and ineffective.Acta Neuropsychiatr. 2018 Oct;30(5):244-250. doi: 10.1017/neu.2017.23. Epub 2017 Jul 18. Acta Neuropsychiatr. 2018. PMID: 28718394
-
Antidepressants; what's the beef?Acta Neuropsychiatr. 2019 Feb;31(1):59-60. doi: 10.1017/neu.2019.4. Acta Neuropsychiatr. 2019. PMID: 30843500 No abstract available.
-
Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors are still harmful and ineffective. Responses to the comments by Hieronymus et al.Acta Neuropsychiatr. 2019 Oct;31(5):276-284. doi: 10.1017/neu.2019.24. Acta Neuropsychiatr. 2019. PMID: 31230598
-
Misinformed, misconducted, misguided and misrepresented meta-analyses. The use of antidepressants (AD) in major depressive disorders (MDD).Bipolar Disord. 2020 Dec;22(8):862-863. doi: 10.1111/bdi.12893. Epub 2020 Mar 9. Bipolar Disord. 2020. PMID: 32090411 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Duloxetine versus 'active' placebo, placebo or no intervention for major depressive disorder; a protocol for a systematic review of randomised clinical trials with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.Syst Rev. 2021 Jun 9;10(1):171. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01722-5. Syst Rev. 2021. PMID: 34108032 Free PMC article.
-
Newer generation antidepressants for depressive disorders in children and adolescents.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Nov 14;11(11):CD004851. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004851.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012. PMID: 23152227 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) for depressive disorders in children and adolescents.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jul 18;(3):CD004851. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004851.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Nov 14;11:CD004851. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004851.pub3. PMID: 17636776 Updated. Review.
-
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 36321557 Free PMC article.
-
Vortioxetine for depression in adults.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 5;7(7):CD011520. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011520.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 28677828 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Altered Serotonin 2A (5-HT2A) Receptor Signaling Underlies Mild TBI-Elicited Deficits in Social Dominance.Front Pharmacol. 2022 Jul 15;13:930346. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.930346. eCollection 2022. Front Pharmacol. 2022. PMID: 35910378 Free PMC article.
-
Adrenal activity and metabolic risk during randomized escitalopram or placebo treatment in PCOS.Endocr Connect. 2018 Mar;7(3):479-489. doi: 10.1530/EC-18-0077. Epub 2018 Feb 22. Endocr Connect. 2018. PMID: 29472241 Free PMC article.
-
Adjunctive simvastatin for treatment-resistant depression: study protocol of a 12-week randomised controlled trial.BJPsych Open. 2019 Jan;5(1):e13. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2018.84. BJPsych Open. 2019. PMID: 30762508 Free PMC article.
-
Are Concerns About Irremediableness, Vulnerability, or Competence Sufficient to Justify Excluding All Psychiatric Patients from Medical Aid in Dying?Health Care Anal. 2018 Dec;26(4):326-343. doi: 10.1007/s10728-017-0344-8. Health Care Anal. 2018. PMID: 28624976
-
Duloxetine versus 'active' placebo, placebo or no intervention for major depressive disorder; a protocol for a systematic review of randomised clinical trials with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.Syst Rev. 2021 Jun 9;10(1):171. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01722-5. Syst Rev. 2021. PMID: 34108032 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources