Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jul 21;357(6348):314-318.
doi: 10.1126/science.aan0063.

Bidirectional eukaryotic DNA replication is established by quasi-symmetrical helicase loading

Affiliations

Bidirectional eukaryotic DNA replication is established by quasi-symmetrical helicase loading

Gideon Coster et al. Science. .

Abstract

Bidirectional replication from eukaryotic DNA replication origins requires the loading of two ring-shaped minichromosome maintenance (MCM) helicases around DNA in opposite orientations. MCM loading is orchestrated by binding of the origin recognition complex (ORC) to DNA, but how ORC coordinates symmetrical MCM loading is unclear. We used natural budding yeast DNA replication origins and synthetic DNA sequences to show that efficient MCM loading requires binding of two ORC molecules to two ORC binding sites. The relative orientation of these sites, but not the distance between them, was found to be critical for MCM loading in vitro and origin function in vivo. We propose that quasi-symmetrical loading of individual MCM hexamers by ORC and directed MCM translocation into double hexamers acts as a unifying mechanism for the establishment of bidirectional replication in archaea and eukaryotes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. A single ORC binding site is insufficient for optimal MCM loading and origin function
(A) MCM recruitment and loading are unaffected by a luciferase tag and are defective in Mcm3-13. (B) Untagged WT MCM does not rescue the loading defect of Mcm3-13. (C) A synthetic ORC binding site does not support plasmid replication in vivo, even in the presence of Abf1 binding sites (D) or poly(dA) stretches of increasing length (E), assayed by the formation of yeast colonies after transformation. (F,G) ORC binding to the synthetic site is ATP dependent and comparable to natural origins. (H) The presence of chloride during loading (80 mM KCl) drives sequence specific MCM loading and reveals that natural origins are more efficient than a single synthetic site.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Two ORC sites are necessary and sufficient for maximal MCM loading and origin activity
(A) ORC binding, (B) MCM recruitment and (C) MCM loading onto synthetic substrates containing one or two ORC binding sites in all possible orientations. in vivo origin activity of synthetic two-site substrates in the absence (D) or presence (E) of Abf1 binding sites. (F) Three base pair changes that create a second ORC site are sufficient to convert the Poly(dA) substrates from Figure 1E into active origins.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Natural origins employ one high affinity site and additional secondary sites
(A) Salt sensitivity of one-site loading suggests the usage of a second non-specific site. The indicated amount of salt was present during loading. All reactions were subsequently washed with high salt (1M NaCl). (B) One-site loading is more sensitive to competitor DNA than two-site loading. (C) MCM recruitment and loading as a function of ORC concentration. Data is plotted as mean ±SEM. (D) Natural origins harbor secondary ORC binding sites. (E) MCM loading with synthetic versus natural origins, as well as deletion mutants (See Fig. S6). (F) Mutations in secondary sites impair MCM loading in ARS600.1 and ARS1216.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Two-site loading exhibits flexible spacing and is sensitive to an intervening roadblock
(A) Synergistic loading and (B) origin activity exhibit flexible inter-site spacing. (C) A covalent DNA-protein roadblock between two-sites inhibits synergistic loading. (D) Only the complete roadblock reaction leads to a block in loading. (E) Proposed model for MCM loading. See text for details.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Remus D, et al. Concerted Loading of Mcm2-7 Double Hexamers around DNA during DNA Replication Origin Licensing. Cell. 2009;139:719–730. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Evrin C, et al. A double-hexameric MCM2-7 complex is loaded onto origin DNA during licensing of eukaryotic DNA replication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2009;106:20240–20245. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bell SP, Labib K. Chromosome Duplication in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 2016;203:1027–1067. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Costa A, et al. The structural basis for MCM2-7 helicase activation by GINS and Cdc45. Nature Structural & Molecular Biology. 2011;18:471–7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Moyer SE, Lewis PW, Botchan MR. Isolation of the Cdc45/Mcm2-7/GINS (CMG) complex, a candidate for the eukaryotic DNA replication fork helicase. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2006;103:10236–10241. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances