Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Nov 9;2(11):e1600395.
doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1600395. eCollection 2016 Nov.

Marine plastic debris emits a keystone infochemical for olfactory foraging seabirds

Matthew S Savoca  1   2 , Martha E Wohlfeil  1   2 , Susan E Ebeler  3 , Gabrielle A Nevitt  1   2
Affiliations

Marine plastic debris emits a keystone infochemical for olfactory foraging seabirds

Matthew S Savoca et al. Sci Adv. .

Abstract

Plastic debris is ingested by hundreds of species of organisms, from zooplankton to baleen whales, but how such a diversity of consumers can mistake plastic for their natural prey is largely unknown. The sensory mechanisms underlying plastic detection and consumption have rarely been examined within the context of sensory signals driving marine food web dynamics. We demonstrate experimentally that marine-seasoned microplastics produce a dimethyl sulfide (DMS) signature that is also a keystone odorant for natural trophic interactions. We further demonstrate a positive relationship between DMS responsiveness and plastic ingestion frequency using procellariiform seabirds as a model taxonomic group. Together, these results suggest that plastic debris emits the scent of a marine infochemical, creating an olfactory trap for susceptible marine wildlife.

Keywords: Chemical ecology; conservation biology; dimethyl sulfide; foraging ecology; marine pollution; plastic debris; sensory ecology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. DMS concentration in plastic debris headspace.
(A) DMS was not detected on any of the virgin plastic samples tested (n = 10 samples each for HDPE, LDPE, and PP, N = 30 total). (B) DMS was detected on every plastic sample after marine exposure (n = 12 bags of each plastic type; each bag subsampled five times). Box plots illustrate DMS concentrations on marine-seasoned plastic of each plastic type across sites (HPDE = 8.31 ± 2.25 μg of DMS per gram of plastic; LDPE = 8.90 ± 1.34 μg of DMS per gram of plastic; PP = 9.56 ± 2.33 μg of DMS per gram of plastic). Points represent each bag’s average DMS quantification; the error bars represent the SE of the five subsamples of each bag. Site averages by plastic type are as follows: for BML, x̄HDPE = 13.45 ± 2.41 μg g−1, x̄LDPE = 11.76 ± 1.65 μg g−1, and x̄PP = 4.99 ± 0.98 μg g−1; for HMS, x̄HDPE = 3.16 ± 1.07 μg g−1, x̄LDPE = 6.05 ± 1.39 μg g−1, and x̄PP = 14.13 ± 2.33 μg g−1.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Effects of DMS responsiveness and nesting behavior on plastic ingestion in procellariiform seabirds.
(A) Maximum likelihood estimate (±SEM) of the DMS-responsive and non–DMS-responsive species groups, illustrating a significantly higher frequency of plastic debris ingestion in DMS-responsive species (binomial GLMM, P < 0.0001). (B) Maximum likelihood estimate (±SEM) of burrow- and surface-nesting species groups, illustrating a significantly higher frequency of plastic ingestion in burrow-nesting species (binomial GLMM, P < 0.05). Burrow-nesting behavior is used here as a proxy for DMS responsiveness.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Plastic ingestion and DMS responsiveness among procellariiform seabirds.
Colored circles and horizontal lines represent the mean and 95% CIs for each species’ model-predicted plastic ingestion prevalence. Vertical dashed lines are model-predicted mean plastic ingestion frequency for each group (DMS-responsive and non–DMS-responsive). Vertical dotted lines represent the 95% CIs of the plastic ingestion frequency for each group.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. Relationship of plastic ingestion and nesting behavior.
Colored circles and horizontal lines represent the mean and 95% CIs for each species’ model-predicted plastic ingestion frequency. Vertical dashed lines are model-predicted mean plastic ingestion frequency for each group (burrow- and surface-nesting). Vertical dotted lines represent the 95% CIs of the plastic ingestion frequency for each group.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Seymour J. R., Simó R., Ahmed T., Stocker R., Chemoattraction to dimethylsulfoniopropionate throughout the marine microbial food web. Science 329, 342–345 (2010). - PubMed
    1. Savoca M. S., Nevitt G. A., Evidence that dimethyl sulfide facilitates a tritrophic mutualism between marine primary producers and top predators. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 111, 4157–4161 (2014). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zimmer R. K., Butman C. A., Chemical signaling processes in the marine environment. Biol. Bull. 198, 168–187 (2000). - PubMed
    1. Charlson R. J., Lovelock J. E., Andreae M. O., Warren S. G., Oceanic phytoplankton, atmospheric sulphur, cloud albedo and climate. Nature 326, 655–661 (1987).
    1. Dacey J. W. H., Wakeham S. G., Oceanic dimethylsulfide: Production during zooplankton grazing on phytoplankton. Science 233, 1314–1316 (1986). - PubMed

MeSH terms