Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Jun;18(6):709-738.
doi: 10.1089/ast.2017.1737. Epub 2018 Apr 20.

Exoplanet Biosignatures: A Framework for Their Assessment

Affiliations
Review

Exoplanet Biosignatures: A Framework for Their Assessment

David C Catling et al. Astrobiology. 2018 Jun.

Abstract

Finding life on exoplanets from telescopic observations is an ultimate goal of exoplanet science. Life produces gases and other substances, such as pigments, which can have distinct spectral or photometric signatures. Whether or not life is found with future data must be expressed with probabilities, requiring a framework of biosignature assessment. We present a framework in which we advocate using biogeochemical "Exo-Earth System" models to simulate potential biosignatures in spectra or photometry. Given actual observations, simulations are used to find the Bayesian likelihoods of those data occurring for scenarios with and without life. The latter includes "false positives" wherein abiotic sources mimic biosignatures. Prior knowledge of factors influencing planetary inhabitation, including previous observations, is combined with the likelihoods to give the Bayesian posterior probability of life existing on a given exoplanet. Four components of observation and analysis are necessary. (1) Characterization of stellar (e.g., age and spectrum) and exoplanetary system properties, including "external" exoplanet parameters (e.g., mass and radius), to determine an exoplanet's suitability for life. (2) Characterization of "internal" exoplanet parameters (e.g., climate) to evaluate habitability. (3) Assessment of potential biosignatures within the environmental context (components 1-2), including corroborating evidence. (4) Exclusion of false positives. We propose that resulting posterior Bayesian probabilities of life's existence map to five confidence levels, ranging from "very likely" (90-100%) to "very unlikely" (<10%) inhabited. Key Words: Bayesian statistics-Biosignatures-Drake equation-Exoplanets-Habitability-Planetary science. Astrobiology 18, 709-738.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No competing financial interests exist.

Figures

<b>FIG. 1.</b>
FIG. 1.
A Bayesian framework for biosignature assessment. Spectral and/or photometric data that may contain biosignatures are used with models to find likelihoods given the context of the exoplanet, for example, its astrophysical environment. One likelihood is the conditional probability of those data occurring given the context and the hypothesis that the exoplanet has life. Another likelihood is the probability of the data occurring given the context and the hypothesis that the exoplanet has no life. These two likelihoods are weighted by prior knowledge to provide a best-informed (posterior) probability that the exoplanet has life given the spectral and/or photometric data and context. Blue boxes signify data acquisition. Yellow boxes contain conditional probabilities and prior probabilities that are part of Bayes' Theorem (gray oval), which is expressed in Eq. 7 in the text.
<b>FIG. 2.</b>
FIG. 2.
Four components to assess whether potential biosignatures are best explained by the presence of life. The numbered order and yellow arrows indicate information that an idealized observational strategy would gather sequentially, although in reality the order will likely be different. The blue arrows indicate how practical observation and analysis would require iteration to increase confidence in biosignature acceptance. Alternatively, following the blue arrows could aid in identification of a false positive. These four components, combined with Exo-Earth models (see text), would help to constrain the likelihoods of the biosignature data occurring with and without life: P(data | context, life) and P(data | context, no life), respectively.

Similar articles

  • Exoplanet Biosignatures: Future Directions.
    Walker SI, Bains W, Cronin L, DasSarma S, Danielache S, Domagal-Goldman S, Kacar B, Kiang NY, Lenardic A, Reinhard CT, Moore W, Schwieterman EW, Shkolnik EL, Smith HB. Walker SI, et al. Astrobiology. 2018 Jun;18(6):779-824. doi: 10.1089/ast.2017.1738. Astrobiology. 2018. PMID: 29938538 Free PMC article. Review.
  • Exoplanet Biosignatures: Understanding Oxygen as a Biosignature in the Context of Its Environment.
    Meadows VS, Reinhard CT, Arney GN, Parenteau MN, Schwieterman EW, Domagal-Goldman SD, Lincowski AP, Stapelfeldt KR, Rauer H, DasSarma S, Hegde S, Narita N, Deitrick R, Lustig-Yaeger J, Lyons TW, Siegler N, Grenfell JL. Meadows VS, et al. Astrobiology. 2018 Jun;18(6):630-662. doi: 10.1089/ast.2017.1727. Epub 2018 May 10. Astrobiology. 2018. PMID: 29746149 Free PMC article. Review.
  • Exoplanet Biosignatures: A Review of Remotely Detectable Signs of Life.
    Schwieterman EW, Kiang NY, Parenteau MN, Harman CE, DasSarma S, Fisher TM, Arney GN, Hartnett HE, Reinhard CT, Olson SL, Meadows VS, Cockell CS, Walker SI, Grenfell JL, Hegde S, Rugheimer S, Hu R, Lyons TW. Schwieterman EW, et al. Astrobiology. 2018 Jun;18(6):663-708. doi: 10.1089/ast.2017.1729. Epub 2018 May 4. Astrobiology. 2018. PMID: 29727196 Free PMC article. Review.
  • Exoplanet Biosignatures: At the Dawn of a New Era of Planetary Observations.
    Kiang NY, Domagal-Goldman S, Parenteau MN, Catling DC, Fujii Y, Meadows VS, Schwieterman EW, Walker SI. Kiang NY, et al. Astrobiology. 2018 Jun;18(6):619-629. doi: 10.1089/ast.2018.1862. Epub 2018 May 9. Astrobiology. 2018. PMID: 29741918 Free PMC article.
  • Planning Implications Related to Sterilization-Sensitive Science Investigations Associated with Mars Sample Return (MSR).
    Velbel MA, Cockell CS, Glavin DP, Marty B, Regberg AB, Smith AL, Tosca NJ, Wadhwa M, Kminek G, Meyer MA, Beaty DW, Carrier BL, Haltigin T, Hays LE, Agee CB, Busemann H, Cavalazzi B, Debaille V, Grady MM, Hauber E, Hutzler A, McCubbin FM, Pratt LM, Smith CL, Summons RE, Swindle TD, Tait KT, Udry A, Usui T, Westall F, Zorzano MP. Velbel MA, et al. Astrobiology. 2022 Jun;22(S1):S112-S164. doi: 10.1089/AST.2021.0113. Epub 2022 May 19. Astrobiology. 2022. PMID: 34904892

Cited by

References

    1. Airapetian V.S., Glocer A., Gronoff G., Hebrard E., and Danchi W. (2016) Prebiotic chemistry and atmospheric warming of early Earth by an active young Sun. Nat Geosci 9:452–455
    1. Anglada G., Amado P.J., Ortiz J.L., Gómez J.F., Macías E., Alberdi A., Osorio M., Gómez J.L., De Gregorio-Monsalvo I., Pérez-Torres M.A., Anglada-Escudé G., Berdiñas Z.M., Jenkins J.S., Jimenez-Serra I., Lara L.M., López-González M.J., López-Puertas M., Morales N., Ribas I., Richards A.M.S., Rodríguez-López C., and Rodriguez E. (2017) ALMA discovery of dust belts around Proxima Centauri. Astrophys J Lett 850:L6
    1. Armstrong J.C., Barnes R., Domagal-Goldman S., Breiner J., Quinn T.R., and Meadows V.S. (2014) Effects of extreme obliquity variations on the habitability of exoplanets. Astrobiology 14:277–291 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arney G., Domagal-Goldman S.D., Meadows V.S., Wolf E.T., Schwieterman E., Charnay B., Claire M., Hébrard E., and Trainer M.G. (2016) The pale orange dot: the spectrum and habitability of hazy Archean Earth. Astrobiology 16:873–899 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arnold L. (2008) Earthshine observation of vegetation and implication for life detection on other planets: a review of 2001–2006 works. Space Sci Rev 135:323–333

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources