Targeted Delivery of Erythropoietin Hybridized with Magnetic Nanocarriers for the Treatment of Central Nervous System Injury: A Literature Review
- PMID: 33311979
- PMCID: PMC7726550
- DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S287456
Targeted Delivery of Erythropoietin Hybridized with Magnetic Nanocarriers for the Treatment of Central Nervous System Injury: A Literature Review
Abstract
Although the incidence of central nervous system injuries has continued to rise, no promising treatments have been elucidated. Erythropoietin plays an important role in neuroprotection and neuroregeneration as well as in erythropoiesis. Moreover, the current worldwide use of erythropoietin in the treatment of hematologic diseases allows for its ready application in patients with central nervous system injuries. However, erythropoietin has a very short therapeutic time window (within 6-8 hours) after injury, and it has both hematopoietic and nonhematopoietic receptors, which exhibit heterogenic and phylogenetic differences. These differences lead to limited amounts of erythropoietin binding to in situ erythropoietin receptors. The lack of high-quality evidence for clinical use and the promising results of in vitro/in vivo models necessitate fast targeted delivery agents such as nanocarriers. Among current nanocarriers, noncovalent polymer-entrapping or polymer-adsorbing erythropoietin obtained by nanospray drying may be the most promising. With the incorporation of magnetic nanocarriers into an erythropoietin polymer, spatiotemporal external magnetic navigation is another area of great interest for targeted delivery within the therapeutic time window. Intravenous administration is the most readily used route. Manufactured erythropoietin nanocarriers should be clearly characterized using bioengineering analyses of the in vivo size distribution and the quality of entrapment or adsorption. Further preclinical trials are required to increase the therapeutic bioavailability (in vivo biological identity alteration, passage through the lung capillaries or the blood brain barrier, and timely degradation followed by removal of the nanocarriers from the body) and decrease the adverse effects (hematological complications, neurotoxicity, and cytotoxicity), especially of the nanocarrier.
Keywords: central nervous system; erythropoietin; magnetics; nanoparticles; polymers; regeneration.
© 2020 Hwang.
Conflict of interest statement
The author reports no conflicts of interest in this work.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Magnetically guided targeted delivery of erythropoietin using magnetic nanoparticles: Proof of concept.Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 May;99(19):e19972. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000019972. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020. PMID: 32384447 Free PMC article.
-
Polymeric nanocarriers for magnetic targeted drug delivery: preparation, characterization, and in vitro and in vivo evaluation.Mol Pharm. 2013 Dec 2;10(12):4397-407. doi: 10.1021/mp300718b. Epub 2013 Nov 11. Mol Pharm. 2013. PMID: 24168360
-
Erythropoietin and the nervous system.Brain Res. 2004 Mar 12;1000(1-2):19-31. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2003.12.037. Brain Res. 2004. PMID: 15053948 Review.
-
Advanced targeted therapies in cancer: Drug nanocarriers, the future of chemotherapy.Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2015 Jun;93:52-79. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2015.03.018. Epub 2015 Mar 23. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2015. PMID: 25813885 Review.
-
Natural Polymeric Nanoparticles for Brain-Targeting: Implications on Drug and Gene Delivery.Curr Pharm Des. 2016;22(22):3305-23. doi: 10.2174/1381612822666160204120829. Curr Pharm Des. 2016. PMID: 26845323 Review.
Cited by
-
Transnasal targeted delivery of therapeutics in central nervous system diseases: a narrative review.Front Neurosci. 2023 May 19;17:1137096. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1137096. eCollection 2023. Front Neurosci. 2023. PMID: 37292158 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Iron Oxide Nanoparticles in Regenerative Medicine and Tissue Engineering.Nanomaterials (Basel). 2021 Sep 8;11(9):2337. doi: 10.3390/nano11092337. Nanomaterials (Basel). 2021. PMID: 34578651 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Storring PL, Tiplady RJ, Gaines Das RE, et al. Epoetin alfa and beta differ in their erythropoietin isoform compositions and biological properties. Br J Haematol. 1998;100(1):79–89. - PubMed
-
- Murua A, Orive G, Hernandez RM, Pedraz JL. Emerging technologies in the delivery of erythropoietin for therapeutics. Med Res Rev. 2011;31(2):284–309. - PubMed
-
- Buemi M, Caccamo C, Nostro L, Cavallaro E, Floccari F, Grasso G. Brain and cancer: the protective role of erythropoietin. Med Res Rev. 2005;25(2):245–259. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources