Impact of minimum unit pricing on alcohol purchases in Scotland and Wales: controlled interrupted time series analyses
- PMID: 34058125
- DOI: 10.1016/S2468-2667(21)00052-9
Impact of minimum unit pricing on alcohol purchases in Scotland and Wales: controlled interrupted time series analyses
Abstract
Background: As a policy option to reduce consumption of alcohol and the harm it does, on May 1, 2018, Scotland introduced a minimum price of 50 British pence (p) per unit of alcohol (8 g) sold; Wales followed suit on March 2, 2020, with the same minimum unit price (MUP). We analysed household purchase data based on bar codes to assess the impact of these policy options in the medium term for Scotland and in the immediate term for Wales.
Methods: For these location-controlled, interrupted time series regression analyses, the data source was Kantar WorldPanel's household shopping panel, which, at the time of our analysis, included 35 242 British households providing detailed information on 1·24 million separate alcohol purchases in 2015-18 and the first half of 2020. With no data exclusions, we analysed the impact of introducing MUP in Scotland, using purchases in northern England as control, and in Wales, using western England as control. The studied changes associated with MUP were price paid per gram of alcohol purchased, grams of alcohol purchased, and amount of money spent on alcohol.
Findings: In Scotland, price increases and purchase decreases following the introduction of MUP in 2018 were maintained during the first half of 2020. The difference between Scotland and northern England in 2020 was a price increase of 0·741 p per gram (95% CI 0·724-0·759), a 7·6% increase, and a purchase decrease of 7·063 g per adult per household per day that an alcohol purchase was made (6·656-7·470), a 7·7% decrease. In Wales, the introduction of MUP led to similar results. The difference between Wales and western England was a price increase 0·841 of 0·841 p per gram (0·732-0·951), an 8·2% increase, and a purchase decrease of 7·052 g per adult per household per day that an alcohol purchase was made (6·463-7·640), an 8·6% decrease. For both Scotland and Wales, reductions in overall purchases of alcohol were largely restricted to households that bought the most alcohol. The introduction of MUP was not associated with an increased expenditure on alcohol by households that generally bought small amounts of alcohol and, in particular, those with low incomes. The changes were not affected by the introduction of COVID-19 confinement in the UK on March 26, 2020.
Interpretation: The evidence base supporting the positive, targeted impact of MUP is strengthened by the comparable results for Scotland and Wales. The short-term impact of MUP in Scotland during 2018 is maintained during the first half of 2020. MUP is an effective alcohol policy option to reduce off-trade purchases of alcohol and should be widely considered.
Funding: None.
Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Minimum unit price deters heaviest alcohol purchasers.Lancet Public Health. 2021 Aug;6(8):e535-e536. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(21)00095-5. Epub 2021 May 28. Lancet Public Health. 2021. PMID: 34058126 No abstract available.
-
Alcohol-related harms and the case for minimum unit pricing.Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Aug;6(8):597. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(21)00229-6. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021. PMID: 34246350 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Impact of minimum unit pricing on shifting purchases from higher to lower strength beers in Scotland: Controlled interrupted time series analyses, 2015-2020.Drug Alcohol Rev. 2022 Mar;41(3):646-656. doi: 10.1111/dar.13408. Epub 2021 Nov 17. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2022. PMID: 34791729
-
Immediate impact of minimum unit pricing on alcohol purchases in Scotland: controlled interrupted time series analysis for 2015-18.BMJ. 2019 Sep 25;366:l5274. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l5274. BMJ. 2019. PMID: 31554617 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of price promotion, price, and minimum unit price on household purchases of low and no alcohol beers and ciders: Descriptive analyses and interrupted time series analysis of purchase data from 70, 303 British households, 2015-2018 and first half of 2020.Soc Sci Med. 2021 Feb;270:113690. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113690. Epub 2021 Jan 9. Soc Sci Med. 2021. PMID: 33461035
-
Mapping discourse coalitions in the minimum unit pricing for alcohol debate: a discourse network analysis of UK newspaper coverage.Addiction. 2019 Apr;114(4):741-753. doi: 10.1111/add.14514. Epub 2019 Jan 4. Addiction. 2019. PMID: 30475418 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Scotland's alcohol crisis: A clinician's perspective on a public health emergency.J R Coll Physicians Edinb. 2023 Mar;53(1):65-70. doi: 10.1177/14782715221146607. Epub 2023 Jan 6. J R Coll Physicians Edinb. 2023. PMID: 36606672 Review.
Cited by
-
The COVID-19 alcohol paradox: British household purchases during 2020 compared with 2015-2019.PLoS One. 2022 Jan 19;17(1):e0261609. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261609. eCollection 2022. PLoS One. 2022. PMID: 35045099 Free PMC article.
-
[Potential impact of increased alcohol taxes on the alcohol-attributable burden of disease in Germany: a modelling study].Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2022 Jun;65(6):668-676. doi: 10.1007/s00103-022-03528-9. Epub 2022 Apr 19. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2022. PMID: 35441234 Free PMC article. German.
-
Evaluating the impact of alcohol minimum unit pricing on deaths and hospitalisations in Scotland: a controlled interrupted time series study.Lancet. 2023 Apr 22;401(10385):1361-1370. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00497-X. Epub 2023 Mar 20. Lancet. 2023. PMID: 36963415 Free PMC article.
-
Alcohol policies in India: A scoping review.PLoS One. 2023 Nov 17;18(11):e0294392. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294392. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 37976246 Free PMC article.
-
Alcohol Consumption during the COVID-19 Lockdown Period: Predictors of At-Risk Drinking at Different AUDIT-C Cut-Off Thresholds.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 10;18(24):13042. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182413042. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021. PMID: 34948646 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials