Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jan-Dec:58:469580211060300.
doi: 10.1177/00469580211060300.

Analysis of Doctor-Patient Relationship in Post-COVID-19 Period: Perspective Differences Between Citizen and Medical Staff

Lingmin Hu  1 , Lijing Bai  1 , Shenyu Zhao  2 , Renjie Lu  3   4   5
Affiliations

Analysis of Doctor-Patient Relationship in Post-COVID-19 Period: Perspective Differences Between Citizen and Medical Staff

Lingmin Hu et al. Inquiry. 2021 Jan-Dec.

Abstract

To evaluate the current views on doctor-patient relationship (DPR) between citizens and medical staff in post-Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) period and predict the possible factors of DPR, we distributed questionnaires by a online questionnaire platform--Questionnaire Star (https://www.wjx.cn) to evaluate DPR in post-COVID-19 period. Overall, 312 questionnaires for citizens and 421 questionnaires for medical staff were completed. Citizens felt that service attitude and communication with medical staff, and registering process have been improved. And their trust in doctors has increased by 86.8%. Majority of citizens (66.0%) preferred the tertiary hospitals. If doctor-patient contradictions occurred, 62.9% citizens preferred internal negotiation (with the doctor involved, 44.6%; with hospital management department, 18.3%). There was significant difference of views on the causes of medical violence incidents and the reasons for doctor-patient conflicts in the future between citizens and medical staff. The DPR score of medical staff was lower than citizens at each stage, and even showed a downward tendency in post-COVID-19 period. Furthermore, 20.4% medical staff believed that harmonious DPR would not be maintained, which was distinct from that of the citizens. Combating the COVID-19 provided an important opportunity to improve the DPR. However, unbalanced allocation of high-quality medical resources, gap between the actual treatment efficacy and patient's expectation, fairness and efficiency issues, financial conflicts, and medical information symmetry were still the influencing factors of DPR.

Keywords: COVID-19; citizen; doctor-patient relationship; medical staff; post-COVID-19 period.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
DPR score of citizens and medical staff at different stages of COVID-19 period.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Eveleigh RM, Muskens E, van Ravesteijn H, et al. An overview of 19 instruments assessing the doctor-patient relationship: Different models or concepts are used. J Clin Epidemiol. 2012;65:10-15. - PubMed
    1. Banerjee A, Sanyal D. Dynamics of doctor-patient relationship: A cross-sectional study on concordance, trust, and patient enablement. J Family Community Med. 2012;19:12-19. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Martin DJ, Garske JP, Davis MK. Relation of the therapeutic alliance with outcome and other variables: A meta-analytic review. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2000;68:438-450. - PubMed
    1. de Waard CS, Poot AJ, den Elzen WPJ, et al. Perceived doctor-patient relationship and satisfaction with general practitioner care in older persons in residential homes. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2018;36:189-197. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Taube KM. Patient-doctor relationship in dermatology: From compliance to concordance. Acta Derm Venereol. 2016;96:25-29. - PubMed

Publication types