Summary:
The terminology for ant females which are morphologically intermediate between “normal”, originally winged queens and workers teems with ill-defined terms, such as “ergatogyne”, “apterogyne”, or “gynaecoid worker”. The terminology proposed by Peeters (1991a) gets rid of most of these terms but fails to distinguish between sporadically occurring “intercastes”, reared due to “mistakes” in caste differentiation, and “intermorphic queens”, which are the ordinary female reproductives in many colonies of formicoxenine ants. A detailed examination of development, morphology, and occurrence of the latter suggests that intermorphic queens are more similar to ergatoid queens (sensu Peeters, 1991a) than to “intercastes”, and should not be comprised under the latter term.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Received 9 May 1997; revised 20 October 1997; accepted 31 October 1997.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Heinze, J. Intercastes, intermorphs, and ergatoid queens: who is who in ant reproduction? . Insectes soc. 45, 113–124 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/s000400050073
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s000400050073