The Paris Agreement introduced three mitigation targets. In the future, the main focus should not be on temperature targets such as 2 or 1.5 °C, but on the target with the greatest potential to effectively guide policy: net zero emissions.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
-
Exploring the links between climate transparency and mitigation policy through a reflexive capacity lens: case studies of Brazil, China, India, Indonesia, and Mexico
International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics Open Access 17 October 2023
-
Green frontrunner or indebted culprit? Assessing Denmark’s climate targets in light of fair contributions under the Paris Agreement
Climatic Change Open Access 20 July 2023
-
Threshold, budget and deadline: beyond the discourse of climate scarcity and control
Climatic Change Open Access 10 August 2021
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $21.58 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Adoption of the Paris Agreement FCCC/CP/2015/L.9/Rev.1 (UNFCCC, 2015); http://go.nature.com/45AnVU,
Jordan, A. et al. Clim. Policy 13, 751–769 (2013).
Jackson, R. B. et al. Nature Clim. Change 6, 7–10 (2016).
Kolstad, C. et al. in Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change (eds Edenhofer, O. et al.) 207–282 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014); http://go.nature.com/4D6oxe,
Fisher, B. S. et al. in Climate Change 2007: Mitigation (eds Metz, B. et al.) 169–250 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2007); http://go.nature.com/I4qNvQ,
Geden, O. Modifying the 2 °C Target (German Institute for International and Security Affairs, 2013); http://go.nature.com/uUPo1T,
Vogler, J. Climate Change in World Politics (Palgrave Macmillan, 2015).
Hoppe, R. The Governance of Problems (Policy Press, 2013).
Brunsson, N. The Consequences of Decision-Making (Oxford Univ. Press, 2007).
Edvardsson Björnberg, K. Energy Policy 56, 285–292 (2013).
Knutti, R., Rogelj, J., SedláÄek, J. & Fischer, E. M. Nature Geosci. 9, 13–18 (2016).
Geden, O. Nature 521, 27–28 (2015).
Rogelj, J. et al. Environ. Res. Lett. 10, 105007 (2015).
Thornton, J. & Covington, H. Nature Geosci. 9, 3–5 (2016).
Briggs, S., Kennel, C. F. & Victor, D. G. Nature Clim. Change 5, 969–70 (2015).
Meadowcroft, J. Climatic Change 118, 137–49 (2013).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Geden, O. An actionable climate target. Nature Geosci 9, 340–342 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2699
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2699
This article is cited by
-
Exploring the links between climate transparency and mitigation policy through a reflexive capacity lens: case studies of Brazil, China, India, Indonesia, and Mexico
International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics (2023)
-
Green frontrunner or indebted culprit? Assessing Denmark’s climate targets in light of fair contributions under the Paris Agreement
Climatic Change (2023)
-
Net-zero emissions targets are vague: three ways to fix
Nature (2021)
-
Threshold, budget and deadline: beyond the discourse of climate scarcity and control
Climatic Change (2021)
-
Balancing a budget or running a deficit? The offset regime of carbon removal and solar geoengineering under a carbon budget
Climatic Change (2021)
