Jump to content

User talk:Electropunk65

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, Electropunk65, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Electropunk65/sandbox, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! GPL93 (talk) 17:15, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Electropunk65/sandbox, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. GPL93 (talk) 17:15, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please advise reason for this. It might not be perfect - it is my first submission after all. But it is genuine and it did take a lot of work. The subject "Andy Pickford" has genuine valid reasons for being on Wikipedia since some of his peers already are. Omitting him would leave a knowledge gap. So please advise what needs to be done to rectify the situation and i will endeavour to correct it. Electropunk65 (talk) 10:43, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Andy Pickford (April 23)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cinder painter was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Cinder painter (talk) 13:00, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Electropunk65! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Cinder painter (talk) 13:00, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Have made amendments. They may be sufficient, they may not. Awaiting on one key article from Belgian Prog Rock magazine "Prog Resiste". This artist is part of a niche genre which includes Ian Boddy and Mark Shreeve in the UK, better known artists such as Tangerine Dream and Klaus Schulze on the continent. That the artist is notable enough isn't in question. He's known globally, to most members of the EMMY Awards voting committee, and regarded as at the top of his game in his niche genre. Why does he appear to lack reviews, citations etc? Apparently, he's an "off-gridder", refuses to market or advertise, doesn't tour, doesn't submit music for review etc. He's turned down several "album of the year" nominations from the leading genre outlet "Schallwelle" (Germany). And yet, after 40 years of contribution to his field, has still become widely known enough in Prog and Electronica circuits and commands respect from his fellow artists. In short, he is notable for his influence, not for his celebrity status. I'm hoping this does not preclude him from being included. Electropunk65 (talk) 18:19, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Andy Pickford has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Andy Pickford. Thanks! S0091 (talk) 16:48, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Andy Pickford has been accepted

[edit]
Andy Pickford, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

S0091 (talk) 16:53, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Now you have to do one about Paul Nagle. :) S0091 (talk) 16:57, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I started that last night - you're a mind reader :-) Electropunk65 (talk) 19:33, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Paul Nagle (April 24)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rusalkii was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Rusalkii (talk) 21:46, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Paul Nagle (April 25)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jannatulbaqi was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Baqi:) (talk) 09:15, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Paul Lawler has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Paul Lawler. Thanks! S0091 (talk) 18:58, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tips

[edit]

First, do not remove sources as I accepted it based on the sources at that time and the article will go through another review so let what's there be.

To add additional sources and related content, be sure when you are in edit mode you are using the Visual Editor. When you select edit, on the top right corner there is pencil icon where you can choose which editing tool (Source or Visual Editor). Select Visual Editor then follow the instructions at WP:INTREFVE. Essentially, you copy the url into the Automatic citation function, click Generate and it will format it for you, then Insert. It's like magic. In a couple clicks it returns a formatted citation. S0091 (talk) 20:19, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to leave everything be for now and make sure I've read through every guide, instruction, FAQ, etc. I'm clearly still a novice at this and I need to do better. Electropunk65 (talk) 10:21, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
For understanding what Wikipedia considers a reliable source WP:RSP might be helpful as it is a list of common sources that have been discussed several times and community's reliability determination. WP:42 is a quick read as is WP:THREE for notability. Your first article is pretty good for the basics of creating an article. Editing just takes practice but I do strongly encourage using Visual Editor. You can also do the WP:Wikipedia Adventure. You know where my talk page is if you have questions but there's also the Teahouse. S0091 (talk) 17:35, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Paul Nagle (April 26)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Setergh was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Setergh (talk) 09:26, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Paul Nagle (April 26)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AlphaBetaGamma was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
AlphaBetaGamma (Talk/report any mistakes here) 15:05, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Paul Lawler (April 26)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 16:29, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Himesh Patel (April 26)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zzz plant was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Zzz plant (talk) 17:13, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jessica Barden (April 26)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MCE89 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
MCE89 (talk) 17:14, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alex Esmail (April 26)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MCE89 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
MCE89 (talk) 17:15, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sebastian Roché (April 26)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zzz plant was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Zzz plant (talk) 17:15, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ncuti Gatwa (April 26)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zzz plant was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Zzz plant (talk) 17:17, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note about your recent drafts

[edit]

Hello Electropunk65, hope you are doing well. I'm writing about some of your recent submissions to Articles for Creation - between me and MCE89, we have declined 5 drafts for articles that already exist today. I'd like to request that you make sure to check carefully to see if a subject is already represented in a Wikipedia article. If you'd like to make improvements to existing articles, you are welcome to do so but a duplicate draft cannot be accepted at AfC. Thank you, Zzz plant (talk) 17:24, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Electropunk65. I was actually just writing up a message for you as well — to add to what Zzz plant has said above, I wanted to let you know that while reviewing these drafts I also noticed that none of their sources appear to exist. All of the sources I checked led to error pages and there is no trace of them on Google. Are you able to explain why this might be?
In future, please verify your sources and do not rely on AI tools to write content. AI chatbots have a tendency to hallucinate sources and are generally not suitable for writing on Wikipedia. You can refer to WP:LLM for more on this. Thank you. MCE89 (talk) 17:33, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ashley Franklin (April 27)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jlwoodwa was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
jlwoodwa (talk) 03:28, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]