User talk:Wcquidditch
Welcome to Wcquidditch's talk page
|
 | |
| Wikipedia ads | file info – show another – #14 |
The Signpost: 9 April 2025
[edit]- Opinion: Crawlers, hogs and gorillas
- Debriefing: Giraffer's RfA debriefing
- Obituary: RHaworth, TomCat4680 and PawełMM
- Traffic report: Heigh-Ho, Heigh-Ho, off to report we go...
- News from Diff: Strengthening Wikipedia’s neutral point of view
- Comix: Thirteen
Orphaned non-free image File:WJTO730.png
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:WJTO730.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:15, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
| Views/Day | Quality | Title | Tagged with… |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | 
|
Channel X Radio (talk) | Add sources |
| 8 | 
|
WMNY (talk) | Add sources |
| 91 |
|
WSOC-TV (talk) | Add sources |
| 31 |
|
KIEM-TV (talk) | Add sources |
| 84 |
|
WMAZ-TV (talk) | Add sources |
| 192 | 
|
Cox Media Group (talk) | Add sources |
| 43 |
|
WWBX (talk) | Cleanup |
| 40 |
|
Media General (talk) | Cleanup |
| 224 |
|
WSAZ-TV (talk) | Cleanup |
| 16 |
|
KVIQ-LD (talk) | Expand |
| 52 |
|
KHBS (talk) | Expand |
| 61 |
|
KOTA-TV (talk) | Expand |
| 108 |
|
WNEW-FM (talk) | Unencyclopaedic |
| 54 |
|
WFAN-FM (talk) | Unencyclopaedic |
| 124 |
|
WHSQ (talk) | Unencyclopaedic |
| 153 |
|
WMC-TV (talk) | Merge |
| 59 |
|
KTWV (talk) | Merge |
| 22 |
|
KULR-TV (talk) | Merge |
| 18 |
|
KLAF-LD (talk) | Wikify |
| 12 |
|
KXPI-LD (talk) | Wikify |
| 139 |
|
Mathematics education in the United States (talk) | Wikify |
| 3 |
|
Adam de Ireys (talk) | Orphan |
| 2 |
|
Celedonia Jones (talk) | Orphan |
| 3 |
|
Chenkara (talk) | Orphan |
| 6 |
|
WBYY (talk) | Stub |
| 7 |
|
WXME (talk) | Stub |
| 6 |
|
WRFK (FM) (talk) | Stub |
| 6 |
|
WBCQ-FM (talk) | Stub |
| 5 |
|
WLKW (FM) (talk) | Stub |
| 8 |
|
WCFR (talk) | Stub |
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:56, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
How to speedy delete
[edit]Hey, sorry to bother you. I wanna ask, how can a page be deleted as soon as possible? Because the page Kupiansk Offensive that I nominated was actually meant for Draft:Kupiansk Offensive. But it seems a new Wikipedia user accidentally created the main page instead. Now, the Draft:Kupiansk Offensive can’t be moved to Kupiansk Offensive since the page already exists. Thank you Bukansatya (talk) 01:24, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
- In and of itself, I don't think anything in the speedy deletion criteria would by itself apply in such a conflict; the AfD you started would have to play out. That said, Bcom123 (talk · contribs), the creator of the mainspace version, did make a comment there that could make the G7 criterion applicable (the only edit to the article other than their creation was the AfD tag), though they might have to be the one to tag it as such. That's the best I have to offer here (I mostly do delsorting and other gnomish tasks at AfD, and tend not to be involved with draftspace/AfC at all). WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:28, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks beforehand for taking your time for me, but honestly, I'm sorry I don't really get what you explained because this is my first time dealing with something like this. From what I understand, at least if the page creator agrees and/or the creator marks the page with a G7 tag, the speedy delete process can be done, right? Oh yeah, I also wanna ask, roughly how many votes are needed for a page to be deleted? Bukansatya (talk) 06:32, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
- As best I can tell, your understanding with regard to G7 appears to be correct. As for your second question, discussions such as at AfD are not supposed to be about "voting" despite any appearances to the contrary, and closures can be based more on the quality of the comments and less on simply vote-counting; at times, there may be no consensus, even if it appears one side has more "votes". (There are also procedures for when there are few or no comments, which in uncontroversial cases can still lead to deletion, but with two bolded comments already this probably will not come into play.) WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 23:01, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
- Alright, I think I kinda get it now. Thanks for taking the time to respond to me Bukansatya (talk) 17:55, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
- As best I can tell, your understanding with regard to G7 appears to be correct. As for your second question, discussions such as at AfD are not supposed to be about "voting" despite any appearances to the contrary, and closures can be based more on the quality of the comments and less on simply vote-counting; at times, there may be no consensus, even if it appears one side has more "votes". (There are also procedures for when there are few or no comments, which in uncontroversial cases can still lead to deletion, but with two bolded comments already this probably will not come into play.) WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 23:01, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks beforehand for taking your time for me, but honestly, I'm sorry I don't really get what you explained because this is my first time dealing with something like this. From what I understand, at least if the page creator agrees and/or the creator marks the page with a G7 tag, the speedy delete process can be done, right? Oh yeah, I also wanna ask, roughly how many votes are needed for a page to be deleted? Bukansatya (talk) 06:32, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:WWDT43.png
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:WWDT43.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:10, 22 April 2025 (UTC)