Jump to content

Guanzi (text)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Guanzi
Chinese管子
Literal meaning"[Writings of] Master Guan"
Transcriptions
Standard Mandarin
Hanyu PinyinGuǎnzǐ
Wade–GilesKuan3-tzu3
IPA[kwàn.tsɹ̩̀]
Yue: Cantonese
Yale RomanizationGún-jí
JyutpingGun2-zi2
IPA[kun˧˥.tsi˧˥]
Southern Min
Tâi-lôKńg-tzú
Old Chinese
Baxter–Sagart (2014)*[k]ˤo[n]ʔ tsəʔ

The Guanzi (Chinese: 管子) is an anonymously written, foundational Chinese political and philosophical text. Compiled in the early Han dynasty, earlier, similar versions are suggested to date back to the late Warring states period, with ideas ranging farther back;[1] despite its later dating, it is arguably one of the most representative texts of the concepts of political economy that developed during the Spring and Autumn period.[2] At over 135,000 characters, it is one of the longest early Chinese philosophical texts, originally comprising 86 chapters, of which 76 survive. It covers broad subject matter, famously including price regulation of commodities via the concept of "light and heavy" (轻重). Ming dynasty agricultural scientist Xu Guangqi still frequently cited the Guanzi and the Xunzi.[3]

Classification history

[edit]

Most chapters of the Guanzi deal with government and the art of rulership, but also contains chapters like the Daoistic Neiye. K. C. Hsiao took "Straight Thinking", and "Pure Heart" (chuan 13, essays 36–38; "Xin Shu" parts one and two, and "Pai Xin") as "clarifications of Huang-Lao ("Yellow Emperor Daoist") tenets". Although Liu Xin viewed the work as "Legalist" (Fajia), the Guanzi was still listed as Daoist in the Book of Han's Journal of Literature Chapter 30, which lists texts like Shen Buhai, Shen Dao and Han Feizi as 'Legalist'. The Guanzi was not listed as 'Legalist' until the Book of Sui's Journal of Writings.[4] It may have been viewed as more Legalist later partly because the Han Feizi mentions it alongside the Book of Lord Shang.[1]

Emphasizing techniques (Shu) of government, while the Guanzi does share with other texts later listed as Legalist a view that power is independent of morality, it still advocates (Fa), a concept including law, as an adjunct to Confucian Li, which is also a "core term" in the text. Despite an "abundant" use of the term fa itself, the Huananzi, Sima Qian and Liu Xiang took it as more broadly focused on governmental measures and the restoration of political order, not specifically identifying it with fa or focusing on chapters that would be more relevant for it. Based on a selected quotation from "On Sherding the People", Sima Qian considered both proper measures (服度) and Li important for the state in the Guanzi, including ritual and moderation, adequate food and clothing, distinctions between honor and shame, and relationships and cardinal virtues.[5]

Although prominent in Taiwan, translator W. Allyn Rickett dissented from the later historical, traditional Confucian view of the text as Legalist, judging it to present a view much closer to that of the late Warring States period's "realistic" Confucian Xunzi than either the "highly idealistic Confucianism of Mencius" or the "Draconian Legalism" of Shang Yang. But while earlier twentieth century scholarship commonly compared the Guanzi with the Book of Lord Shang, Han Feizi, and Confucianism, some chapters are modernly compared with the Daoistic Huangdi Sijing, following the discovery of the Mawangdui Silk Texts, encouraging a reconsideration of it's governmental ideas.[6]

Theoretical pre-Han influence

[edit]

The Guanzi is named for and traditionally attributed to the 7th century BCE philosopher and statesman Guan Zhong, who served as Prime Minister to Duke Huan of Qi.[7] It was, however, written by several anonymous authors. The precise date of creation remains subject to historical debate.[8] It contains a wide variety of material from many different authors over several successive centuries, largely associated with the 4th century BCE Jixia Academy in the Qi capital of Linzi. But the Han dynasty scholar Liu Xiang did not edit the received Guanzi text until circa 26 BCE, compiling a new edition at that time.[7][9][10]

The present text is "arguably a much later expression of ideas in the direction of the Han Feizi".[11] None of its existing chapters would appear to predate the first century BCE, so that much of it would have been compiled after the Han Feizi. However, the Han Feizi is the first reference for both the Guanzi and the Book of Lord Shang. With Han Fei reputedly dying in 233 BC, a "proto-Guanzi" theoretically "took shape" in earlier form around 250 BCE, in the late Warring States period. Based on the Han Feizi, this earlier Guanzi might have already gone into broad circulation by that time alongside the Book of Lord Shang, becoming popular among the nobles.[12] If the text is taken as Huang-Lao, representative of the early Daoistic Han, then although controversial, it represents the kind of mileu that Sinologist Hansen (Stanford Encyclopedia) thinks was already becoming dominant by the Qin dynasty, based on the Mawangdui silk texts.[13]

Professor Masayuki Sato 佐藤將之 disagrees with attempts by Rickett (and a "few other scholars") to date some chapters to the Han dynasty, but agrees with a late Warring States dating for most of the work, considering it's "intellectual, cultural, political, economic, and social realities" reflective of the period. If Masayuki's judgement is correct, then apart from its lost chapters the earlier version may have been quite similiar since the present version already looks like a late Warring States text. Masayuki considers "Canonical Statements" the earliest chapter, only dating it as far back as the mid Warring states period.[1]

Daoistic Content

[edit]

As is typical of an ancient Chinese text, the organization of the Guanzi has been altered over time, the chronology and significance of which is not all that clear. Covering a wide variety of subjects, ranging from detailed economic discussions to overviews of local soil topography, many chapters include Confucian values as a necessity for the state, expressing a blend of what may be considered Legalistic, Confucian, and Daoistic philosophy that has been termed "Huang-Lao". The first reference to the collection appears in the more Daostic Huainanzi, of the early Han dynasty,[10] and Han bibliographies listed the text as Daoist.[14]

Yin-yang and five phase ideas play a more important role in later chapters.[15] Its Neiye ("Inner Enterprise/Training") has a potential influence for the Zhuangzi,[16]: 357  and has the oldest recorded descriptions of Daoist meditation techniques.

When you enlarge your mind and let go of it,

When you relax your [qi 氣] vital breath and expand it,
When your body is calm and unmoving:
And you can maintain the One and discard the myriad disturbances.
You will see profit and not be enticed by it,
You will see harm and not be frightened by it.
Relaxed and unwound, yet acutely sensitive,
In solitude you delight in your own person.
This is called "revolving the vital breath":

Your thoughts and deeds seem heavenly. (24, tr. Roth 1999:92)

Economic and financial insight in the Guanzi

[edit]

Several chapters of the Guanzi address what modern language would call economic and monetary issues. It is a core text on the matter of price stabilization from the ancient Chinese perspective.[17] The economic policies discussed focus on insulating peasants from fluctuations in the context of then-recently developed market forces and to increase commercialization while benefitting the state.[18] "[T]his approach to economic policy suggested that the state should unleash and harness market forces in order to promote wealth for the state and the people."[19]

The "state savings" (國蓄) chapter has been described as the first-ever exposition of the quantity theory of money, and the "light and heavy" (轻重) chapter as the first clear articulation of the law of supply and demand:[20]

Now, the price of grain is heavy in our state and light in the world at large. Then the other lords’ goods will spontaneously leak out like water from a spring flowing downhill. Hence, if goods are heavy, they will come; if light they will go.

In the Guanzi's usage of "heavy," and "light," the former connotes something that is expensive or important while the latter connotes inexpensive or unimportant.[17] In this view, "all economic phenomena can only be understood relationally; things can be heavy or light only in relation to other things."[21]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Citations

[edit]
  1. ^ a b c Pines 2024, p. 141.
  2. ^ Weber, Isabella (2021). How China escaped shock therapy : the market reform debate. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. p. 19. ISBN 978-0-429-49012-5. OCLC 1228187814.
  3. ^ Joanna Handlin Smith 2009 p.252. The Art of Doing Good: Charity in Late Ming China
  4. ^ Pines 2024, p. 143; Hsiao 1979, p. 67; Graham 1989, p. 157,380.
  5. ^ Pines 2024, p. 142-143.
  6. ^ Pines 2024, p. 140.
  7. ^ a b Rickett (1993), p. 244.
  8. ^ Weber, Isabella (2021). How China escaped shock therapy : the market reform debate. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. p. 20. ISBN 978-0-429-49012-5. OCLC 1228187814.
  9. ^ Ricket, Guanzi (1985) p.3
  10. ^ a b Hansen, Chad (2000-08-17). A Daoist Theory of Chinese Thought: A Philosophical Interpretation. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-535076-0.
  11. ^ Hansen 1992, p. 357.
  12. ^ Pines 2017, p. 23; Pines 2024, p. 142.
  13. ^ Hansen 2020; Loewe 1999, p. 1008.
  14. ^ Graham, A. C. (2015-12-15). Disputers of the Tao: Philosophical Argument in Ancient China. Open Court. ISBN 978-0-8126-9942-5.
  15. ^ W. Allyn RICKETT p279. Encyclopedia of Chinese Philosophy 2003
  16. ^ Hansen, Chad (August 17, 2000). A Daoist Theory of Chinese Thought: A Philosophical Interpretation. Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780195350760 – via Google Books.
  17. ^ a b Weber, Isabella (2021). How China escaped shock therapy : the market reform debate. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. p. 18. ISBN 978-0-429-49012-5. OCLC 1228187814.
  18. ^ Weber, Isabella (2021). How China escaped shock therapy : the market reform debate. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. pp. 37–38. ISBN 978-0-429-49012-5. OCLC 1228187814.
  19. ^ Weber, Isabella (2021). How China escaped shock therapy : the market reform debate. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. p. 38. ISBN 978-0-429-49012-5. OCLC 1228187814.
  20. ^ William N. Goetzmann (2016). Money Changes Everything: How Finance Made Civilization Possible. Princeton University Press. pp. 160–161.
  21. ^ Weber, Isabella (2021). How China escaped shock therapy : the market reform debate. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. p. 21. ISBN 978-0-429-49012-5. OCLC 1228187814.

Sources

[edit]
Works cited
[edit]