Jump to content

Klamelia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Klamelia
Temporal range: Middle Jurassic, 175–162 Ma
Preserved portions of Klamelia and speculative skull.
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Domain: Eukaryota
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Mammalia
Order: Eutriconodonta
Family: Klameliidae
Genus: Klamelia
Chow and Rich, 1984
Species
  • K. zhaopengi

Klamelia, named after the district in which it was found, is an extinct Eutriconodontid of the family Klameliidae. It inhabited northwestern China during the Late Jurassic (Oxfordian age).[1][2] Klamelia was discovered in 1984 and is known from highly fragmentary remains, with only a dentary and some of its associated teeth being found.[2][3] There is only one accepted species of Klamelia, K. zhaopengi, which is named after Zhao Xijin and Peng Xiling, who were the paleontologists who collected the holotype specimen.[1]

Discovery

[edit]

The remains of Klamelia were discovered by Zhao Xijin in 1980.[2] It was found in basal section of the Shishugou Group in Xinjiang province of China.[2] Chow and Rich described Klamelia in 1984.[3] The type specimen, IVPP V6447, is property of the Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology in Beijing.[1] Despite another attempt to find fossils in the area in 2003, no more remains of Klamelia have been discovered.[4]

Classification

[edit]
Cast of Gobiconodon, a relative of Klamelia.

When Chow and Rich described Klamelia, they determined it to be closely related to Gobiconodon due to various synapomorphies, notably the shortening of the mandible and reduction of pre-molar teeth to six or less.[1] Thus, they created the new subfamily Gobiconodontidae to include Gobiconodon, Guchinodon (now Gobiconodon), and Klamelia.[3][5] Jenkins and Schaff (1988) subsequently changed Gobiconodontidae from subfamily to family status, but excluded Klamelia from the family in their description of Gobiconodon ostromi.[5][6] Rougier et al. (2001) found that Klamelia was a mammaliaform of uncertain position after discovering Gobiconodon hopsoni.[3] Klamelia was found to be a mammaliaform, however, primarily because of the reassessment of Gobiconodontidae as mammaliaformes.[7] They also noted that the foreshortening of the mandible noted by Chow and Rich to be an indicator of derived features could be incorrect if the last premolar was, as they determined it, a double rooted canine.[7] In 2004, Kielan Jaworowska et al. corroborated the findings of Jenkins and Schaff, finding Klamelia to be a basal Eutriconodontid.[5] In 2006, the newly discovered Ferganodon was found to be the closest relative of Klamelia due to multiple similarities in tooth topography.[8] Thus, Klameliidae was created to contain Klamelia and the newly-found Ferganodon.[3][8] The same study found that Klameliidae was most closely related to Gobiconodontidae.[8]

Phylogeny

[edit]

When Klamelia was described, Chow and Rich created the subfamily Gobiconodontidae. They found Klamelia to be the most derived member due to the shortening of the jaw, but they also found it to be the youngest member of Gobiconodontidae. Chow and Rich found Gobiconodontidae to be a basal clade within Triconodonta (now known as Eutriconodonta), and was subsequently placed within Amphilestidae.[1]

Below is the cladogram created from the results of Chow and Rich, 1984.

Amphilestidae

After the description of Ferganodon in 2006 by Martin and Averianov, 2006, the position of Klamelia was reassessed. Due to Ferganodon and Klamelia have many synapomorphies in their teeth, most notably the teeth being shaped roughly as a parallelogram, Ferganodon was placed as the closest ancestor to Klamelia, and the new family Klameliidae was erected. The study which described Ferganodon found that it contained more plesiomorphies than Klamelia and consequently placed it as the more basal member of Klameliidae. Klameliidae is most closely related to the Gobiconodonts.[8]

Below is the cladogram based off the findings of Martin and Averianov, 2006.

Description

[edit]

Klamelia is distinguished from other Eutriconodonts by having at least six lower molars, fusion of the mandible extending to below the point of contact between the second and third molars, and the furthest back premolar significantly larger than the second molar. Klamelia is also distinguished from basal mammaliaformes by significant differences in their teeth compared to more basal mammaliaformes.[1]

Mandible

[edit]

The mandible displays characteristics which suggests that it was shortened; the first being that the posterior border of the mandibular fusion only stops below the second and the third molar and the second being that the posterior region of the midline symphysis is steeply inclined. The second characteristic indicates that the mandible did not extend much further then the last premolar. Therefore, there would be a reduced number of molars in the jaw, just like in Gobiconodon.[1]

Teeth

[edit]

The teeth increase in size in the posterior portions of the mandible. There are four large cusps on the teeth which are arranged in a straight line, however this could be in part due to warping during fossilization. The third cusp, going from front to back, is the largest by a wide margin. The next largest cusp is the second from the front, then fourth from the front, and the shortest in the frontmost cusp. Ridges of enamel on the tongue side of the tooth are large and continuous on the molars. Ridges of enamel on the cheek side of the tooth are only well developed at the front and back of the molars. The molars overlap each other slightly. To accommodate this, each molar is rotated slightly.[1]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b c d e f g h Chow, Minchen; Rich, Thomas H. V. (1984). "A New Triconodontan (Mammalia) from the Jurassic of China". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 3 (4): 226–231. Bibcode:1984JVPal...3..226C. doi:10.1080/02724634.1984.10011979. ISSN 0272-4634. JSTOR 4522957.
  2. ^ a b c d Fakui, Zhang (January 1984). "THE FOSSIL RECORD OF MESOZOIC MAMMALS IN CHINA" (PDF).
  3. ^ a b c d e Xing, Xu; Clark, James; Eberth, David; Currie, Phillip (2022). "The Shishugou Fauna of the Middle–Late Jurassic Transition Period in the Junggar Basin of Western China".
  4. ^ "Clark - Xinjiang 2003". www2.gwu.edu. Retrieved 2025-04-27.
  5. ^ a b c Sweetman, Steven (2006). "A GOBICONODONTID (MAMMALIA, EUTRICONODONTA) FROM THE EARLY CRETACEOUS (BARREMIAN) WESSEX FORMATION OF THE ISLE OF WIGHT, SOUTHERN BRITAIN" (PDF). School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Portsmouth.
  6. ^ Jenkins, Farish A.; Schaff, Charles R. (1988). "The Early Cretaceous Mammal Gobiconodon (Mammalia, Triconodonta) from the Cloverly Formation in Montana". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 8 (1): 1–24. Bibcode:1988JVPal...8....1J. doi:10.1080/02724634.1988.10011681. ISSN 0272-4634. JSTOR 4523172.
  7. ^ a b Rougier, Guillermo W.; Rougier, Guillermo W.; Novacek, Michael J.; McKenna, Malcolm C.; Wible, John R.; Project, Mongolian-American Museum Paleontological; Akademi, Mongolyn Shinzhlėkh Ukhaany (2001). Gobiconodonts from the early Cretaceous of Oshih (Ashile), Mongolia. Vol. 3348 (2001). New York, NY: American Museum of Natural History.
  8. ^ a b c d Martin, Thomas; Averianov, Alexander (22 September 2006). "A previously unrecognized group of Middle Jurassic triconodontan mammals from Central Asia" (PDF).