Wikipedia talk:A picture of you
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the A picture of you page. |
|
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 28 days ![]() |
![]() | This page is not for seeking help or making test edits. It is solely for discussing the A picture of you page. for using and editing Wikipedia. For common questions about Wikipedia, see Help:Contents. To make test edits, please use the Sandbox. |
![]() | This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 28 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
404
[edit]@Pigsonthewing, I don't know if you saw this article [1], I liked the bit about Jeremy Strong. Perhaps this essay could mention something in the line of "WP is sometimes criticized for having crappy images of (living) people, and this is somewhat justified, since we can only use pictures with certain licenses. But if you want to provide a better pic of yourself, you can!" What do you think? Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 17:56, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you. I've added a few words to the lede. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 18:40, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
- Someone said something nice about your work:[2] Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 15:10, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
This doesn't happen often
[edit]I started a new article on a sculptor, George Lundeen. His assistant turned up at the talkpage, saying thanks for working on this. One can always ask, so I said how about giving us some pictures? She said OK!!! Pictures uploaded at Category:George Lundeen. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 09:04, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
- If there was a big, friendly template right at the top of the page that made it clear that this is possible (indeed, welcome) and how to do it, this might actually happen more often. -- Cl3phact0 (talk) 08:09, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
- As this photo is an excellent example of what PICYOU is attempting to achieve, I've added it to the Commons section. Cheers, Cl3phact0 (talk) 08:17, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
New template (suggestion)
[edit]@Gråbergs Gråa Sång: I suggest that we make a specific template similar to Template:Improve images that links to WP:PICYOU. While most people don't edit Wikipedia (or read Talk, Help, or any other pages beyond what they're looking for), I suspect that it is common for living people who are the subjects of our articles to at least have a quick glance at what's written about them from time to time. If they knew it was possible and fairly simple to contribute a photo, it seems likely that at least some would oblige. Cheers, Cl3phact0 (talk) 08:19, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
PS: I would simply make this Template if I knew how. -- Cl3phact0 (talk) 08:21, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
- I guess you can suggest it at Wikipedia talk:Templates, but I don't think it will be allowed in mainspace, if that's what you meant. Something like Talk:Raegan_Revord#Picture_of_Raegan_Revord can be added by anyone. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 08:32, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
- The Improve images template is a mainspace template. Not sure I see how this would be any different. -- Cl3phact0 (talk) 08:52, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
- My mistake, sorry! Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 08:56, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks for the link above regardless. I just learned how to "pin" a Talk page discussion. -- Cl3phact0 (talk) 09:02, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
- My mistake, sorry! Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 08:56, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
- The Improve images template is a mainspace template. Not sure I see how this would be any different. -- Cl3phact0 (talk) 08:52, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
Implemented by incorporating the idea into Template:Improve images itself: Special:Diff/1289462814. I have a feeling that this is worth trying out. —Alalch E. 20:00, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
- Looks good! Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 08:10, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
Thank you, that's great! Let's see if it gets the desired results. Another minor suggestion
: do you think adding a photo-specific icon like
would be problematic (
looks a bit generic to my eye)? Cheers, Cl3phact0 (talk) 10:16, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
PS: Perhaps this camera iconbetter indicates the intent of the message (although either camera icon seems likely to be more clear than the "w" to people who may be contributing to Wikipedia for the first time). -- Cl3phact0 (talk) 11:14, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
- If you are inclined to make further template edits, the wording could also be ever so slightly improved as well: "or pictures you or someone that you represent". -- Cl3phact0 (talk) 10:54, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
- I dropped a more detailed note about possible enhancements on the Talk page of the template itself. Cheers, Cl3phact0 (talk) 10:21, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
Proof of Concept: We have what appears to be the first BLP image acquisition resulting directly from this initiative (and it's a pretty big fish too: Mira Murati). Hope it doesn't get away ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ -- Cl3phact0 (talk) 04:33, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
Comment: It appears that I spoke too soon. The file is missing evidence of permission
. This is not my area of expertise. -- Cl3phact0 (talk) 09:06, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
- Per that user's other uploads (see their Commons talkpage), seems like standard copyvios, deliberate or not. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 09:14, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
- Ho-hum. Is there something that can be done to try and get permission sorted out on that end (per Wikipedia:A picture of you#Facebook)? (I don't use facebook or know how it works.) -- Cl3phact0 (talk) 09:20, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
- Short of trying to contact the article subject in some way, not really. It's also quite possible that many people don't want a freely licensed picture of them "out there." Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 09:32, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
- Yes, I meant is there a way to simply ask them on facebook? -- Cl3phact0 (talk) 09:58, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
- The subject is unlikely to be the photographer, and hence the copyright holder. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 10:24, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
- In such cases, aren't we are simply addressing the proverbial
(or someone that you can photograph)
rather than the subject? -- Cl3phact0 (talk) 16:56, 3 June 2025 (UTC) - If some intrepid soul sent Murati a message on facebook, she may well simply ask whoever is actually behind the lens to send an email. This side of things is way outside of my skillset. -- Cl3phact0 (talk) 10:30, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
- Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, whatever. Anyone who is willing to use their personal social media (or make one for the purpose) can do that. I'm not, I've only occasionally asked subjects or their reps who turned up on WP for pictures. Oh, and I once mailed College of Policing and asked if they were willing to "give away" this pic, but they never replied. The cane is PD but the picture of it is not. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 10:39, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
- Noted, thank you. As the George Lundeen success story is what sparked this initiative, I thought there might be similarities to the Mira Murati example. -- Cl3phact0 (talk) 10:54, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
- Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, whatever. Anyone who is willing to use their personal social media (or make one for the purpose) can do that. I'm not, I've only occasionally asked subjects or their reps who turned up on WP for pictures. Oh, and I once mailed College of Policing and asked if they were willing to "give away" this pic, but they never replied. The cane is PD but the picture of it is not. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 10:39, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
- In such cases, aren't we are simply addressing the proverbial
- The subject is unlikely to be the photographer, and hence the copyright holder. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 10:24, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
- Yes, I meant is there a way to simply ask them on facebook? -- Cl3phact0 (talk) 09:58, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
- Short of trying to contact the article subject in some way, not really. It's also quite possible that many people don't want a freely licensed picture of them "out there." Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 09:32, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
- Ho-hum. Is there something that can be done to try and get permission sorted out on that end (per Wikipedia:A picture of you#Facebook)? (I don't use facebook or know how it works.) -- Cl3phact0 (talk) 09:20, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
Comment: Editors with technical skills that may be helpful in refining the {{Improve images}} template, please stop by the Talk page of the template itself. There are a few bugs that have yet to be resolved (notably, how to make the "camera upload" icon display properly on mobile devices). Cheers, Cl3phact0 (talk) 16:44, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
Comment: Thus far, the results of this attempt seem modest at best. A few of the articles where the {{Improve images}} template has been added show signs of activity related to this initiative, but there is no clear evidence that the outcome is noteworthy. It also seems that in at least several cases, images have been uploaded – however the helpful instructions provided have been ignored, resulting in misattributed "own work" uploads. Any suggestions for how these results could be improved most welcome. Cheers, Cl3phact0 (talk) 09:46, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
- Well-meaning "own work" uploads from fans could maybe be reduced by changing the
Please consider adding images
link to point to a simpler and more specific landing page, when it's on a biography article. - A few simple headings like "Are you the subject of the article?", "Did you personally take a photo of this person?", "Are you a fan who wants to use an image from social media?" etc. would let the third group know that they couldn't do that, rather than having them overwhelmed by WP:UPIMG (which opens with the temptingly clickable
To upload an image, use the Wikipedia:File upload wizard
before offering a lot of dry supplementary advice about being sure to read other policies and copyright explanations first) and figuring that they can get through the upload process because they think that social media and news websites are probably part of "the public domain". Belbury (talk) 11:03, 17 June 2025 (UTC)- Simplifying matters was very much my thinking when choosing the links that we are currently using for {{Improve images}}. First comes the simple bullet points of WP:IMGDD, followed by the more detailed WP:UPIMAGE, and in the case of BLPs, we try to bring the potential uploader here to WP:PICYOU (which seems really well organised and clear to my eye). The language of the template itself has been simplified (although, per discussion on the template's Talk page, there is perhaps still potential for syntactical improvement, additional optional settings or parameters, etc. – and I do think that
Thank you for helping out!
worked nicely with theWelcome to Wikipedia!
we use here). Simply baffled by how difficult it seems to be to get folks to do this right (or at all). Cheers, Cl3phact0 (talk) 08:17, 18 June 2025 (UTC)- @Cl3phact0 Slightly off-topic, but [3] might interest you. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 06:32, 15 July 2025 (UTC)
- Simplifying matters was very much my thinking when choosing the links that we are currently using for {{Improve images}}. First comes the simple bullet points of WP:IMGDD, followed by the more detailed WP:UPIMAGE, and in the case of BLPs, we try to bring the potential uploader here to WP:PICYOU (which seems really well organised and clear to my eye). The language of the template itself has been simplified (although, per discussion on the template's Talk page, there is perhaps still potential for syntactical improvement, additional optional settings or parameters, etc. – and I do think that
Category:Articles needing additional images
[edit]Users who are interested in this subject may find the subcategories found in Category:Articles needing additional images useful. Cheers, Cl3phact0 (talk) 16:11, 25 July 2025 (UTC)