Skip to content

bump dd-trace-go to v1.73.1 #36229

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

bump dd-trace-go to v1.73.1 #36229

wants to merge 2 commits into from
+51 −42

Conversation

paulcacheux
Copy link
Contributor

@paulcacheux paulcacheux commented Apr 17, 2025 •
edited
Loading

What does this PR do?

This PR bumps dd-trace-go to v1.73.1:

Especially this includes DataDog/dd-trace-go#3304 fixing a small potential leak with internal profiling.

Motivation

Describe how you validated your changes

Possible Drawbacks / Trade-offs

Additional Notes

@github-actions github-actions bot added medium review PR review might take time team/agent-devx labels Apr 17, 2025
@cit-pr-commenter cit-pr-commenter
Copy link

cit-pr-commenter bot commented Apr 17, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Go Package Import Differences

Baseline: a95af0e
Comparison: d674d29

binaryosarchchange
agentlinuxamd64
+1, -0 
+github.com/puzpuzpuz/xsync/v3
agentlinuxarm64
+1, -0 
+github.com/puzpuzpuz/xsync/v3
agentwindowsamd64
+1, -0 
+github.com/puzpuzpuz/xsync/v3
agentdarwinamd64
+1, -0 
+github.com/puzpuzpuz/xsync/v3
agentdarwinarm64
+1, -0 
+github.com/puzpuzpuz/xsync/v3
iot-agentlinuxamd64
+1, -0 
+github.com/puzpuzpuz/xsync/v3
iot-agentlinuxarm64
+1, -0 
+github.com/puzpuzpuz/xsync/v3
heroku-agentlinuxamd64
+1, -0 
+github.com/puzpuzpuz/xsync/v3
cluster-agentlinuxamd64
+1, -0 
+github.com/puzpuzpuz/xsync/v3
cluster-agentlinuxarm64
+1, -0 
+github.com/puzpuzpuz/xsync/v3
cluster-agent-cloudfoundrylinuxamd64
+1, -0 
+github.com/puzpuzpuz/xsync/v3
cluster-agent-cloudfoundrylinuxarm64
+1, -0 
+github.com/puzpuzpuz/xsync/v3
dogstatsdlinuxamd64
+1, -0 
+github.com/puzpuzpuz/xsync/v3
dogstatsdlinuxarm64
+1, -0 
+github.com/puzpuzpuz/xsync/v3
process-agentlinuxamd64
+1, -0 
+github.com/puzpuzpuz/xsync/v3
process-agentlinuxarm64
+1, -0 
+github.com/puzpuzpuz/xsync/v3
process-agentwindowsamd64
+1, -0 
+github.com/puzpuzpuz/xsync/v3
process-agentdarwinamd64
+1, -0 
+github.com/puzpuzpuz/xsync/v3
process-agentdarwinarm64
+1, -0 
+github.com/puzpuzpuz/xsync/v3
heroku-process-agentlinuxamd64
+1, -0 
+github.com/puzpuzpuz/xsync/v3
security-agentlinuxamd64
+1, -0 
+github.com/puzpuzpuz/xsync/v3
security-agentlinuxarm64
+1, -0 
+github.com/puzpuzpuz/xsync/v3
security-agentwindowsamd64
+1, -0 
+github.com/puzpuzpuz/xsync/v3
serverlesslinuxamd64
+2, -0 
+github.com/puzpuzpuz/xsync/v3
+golang.org/x/exp/constraints
serverlesslinuxarm64
+2, -0 
+github.com/puzpuzpuz/xsync/v3
+golang.org/x/exp/constraints
system-probelinuxamd64
+1, -0 
+github.com/puzpuzpuz/xsync/v3
system-probelinuxarm64
+1, -0 
+github.com/puzpuzpuz/xsync/v3
system-probewindowsamd64
+1, -0 
+github.com/puzpuzpuz/xsync/v3
trace-agentlinuxamd64
+1, -0 
+github.com/puzpuzpuz/xsync/v3
trace-agentlinuxarm64
+1, -0 
+github.com/puzpuzpuz/xsync/v3
trace-agentwindowsamd64
+1, -0 
+github.com/puzpuzpuz/xsync/v3
trace-agentdarwinamd64
+1, -0 
+github.com/puzpuzpuz/xsync/v3
trace-agentdarwinarm64
+1, -0 
+github.com/puzpuzpuz/xsync/v3
heroku-trace-agentlinuxamd64
+1, -0 
+github.com/puzpuzpuz/xsync/v3

@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Contributor

agent-platform-auto-pr bot commented Apr 17, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Uncompressed package size comparison

Comparison with ancestor ef24500285bcdf4fe2ba51516b1ed68353372306

Diff per package
package diff status size ancestor threshold
datadog-agent-x86_64-rpm 1.53MB ❌ 784.74MB 783.22MB 0.50MB
datadog-agent-x86_64-suse 1.53MB ❌ 784.74MB 783.22MB 0.50MB
datadog-agent-amd64-deb 1.53MB ❌ 775.79MB 774.27MB 0.50MB
datadog-agent-aarch64-rpm 1.51MB ❌ 770.81MB 769.30MB 0.50MB
datadog-agent-arm64-deb 1.51MB ❌ 761.88MB 760.37MB 0.50MB
datadog-heroku-agent-amd64-deb 0.58MB ❌ 381.23MB 380.65MB 0.50MB
datadog-iot-agent-amd64-deb 0.33MB ⚠️ 63.13MB 62.80MB 0.50MB
datadog-iot-agent-aarch64-rpm 0.33MB ⚠️ 59.78MB 59.45MB 0.50MB
datadog-iot-agent-x86_64-rpm 0.33MB ⚠️ 63.21MB 62.88MB 0.50MB
datadog-iot-agent-x86_64-suse 0.33MB ⚠️ 63.21MB 62.88MB 0.50MB
datadog-iot-agent-arm64-deb 0.33MB ⚠️ 59.70MB 59.37MB 0.50MB
datadog-dogstatsd-x86_64-rpm 0.01MB ⚠️ 32.08MB 32.07MB 0.50MB
datadog-dogstatsd-x86_64-suse 0.01MB ⚠️ 32.08MB 32.07MB 0.50MB
datadog-dogstatsd-amd64-deb 0.01MB ⚠️ 32.00MB 31.99MB 0.50MB
datadog-dogstatsd-arm64-deb 0.01MB ⚠️ 30.48MB 30.47MB 0.50MB

Decision

❌ Failed

Currently this PR is blocked, you can reach out to #agent-delivery-help to get support/ask for an exception.

@cit-pr-commenter cit-pr-commenter
Copy link

cit-pr-commenter bot commented Apr 17, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Regression Detector

Regression Detector Results

Metrics dashboard
Target profiles
Run ID: 836c0b67-e514-4f47-88da-85b83bedf90d

Baseline: a95af0e
Comparison: d674d29
Diff

Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected

Fine details of change detection per experiment

perf experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI trials links
➖ docker_containers_cpu % cpu utilization +2.48 [-0.57, +5.54] 1 Logs
➖ quality_gate_logs % cpu utilization +1.59 [-1.18, +4.37] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
➖ docker_containers_memory memory utilization +0.73 [+0.64, +0.81] 1 Logs
➖ otlp_ingest_metrics memory utilization +0.32 [+0.16, +0.48] 1 Logs
➖ ddot_metrics memory utilization +0.29 [+0.17, +0.41] 1 Logs
➖ uds_dogstatsd_20mb_12k_contexts_20_senders memory utilization +0.27 [+0.21, +0.34] 1 Logs
➖ tcp_syslog_to_blackhole ingress throughput +0.26 [+0.20, +0.33] 1 Logs
➖ quality_gate_idle memory utilization +0.23 [+0.18, +0.29] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
➖ ddot_logs memory utilization +0.15 [+0.02, +0.27] 1 Logs
➖ file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency egress throughput +0.07 [-0.54, +0.68] 1 Logs
➖ file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency egress throughput +0.04 [-0.62, +0.70] 1 Logs
➖ file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency egress throughput +0.03 [-0.57, +0.63] 1 Logs
➖ file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency egress throughput +0.03 [-0.57, +0.63] 1 Logs
➖ file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load egress throughput +0.03 [-0.21, +0.26] 1 Logs
➖ tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude ingress throughput +0.00 [-0.02, +0.03] 1 Logs
➖ uds_dogstatsd_to_api ingress throughput -0.00 [-0.27, +0.27] 1 Logs
➖ file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency egress throughput -0.03 [-0.61, +0.54] 1 Logs
➖ file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 egress throughput -0.04 [-0.64, +0.55] 1 Logs
➖ file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 egress throughput -0.05 [-0.66, +0.57] 1 Logs
➖ quality_gate_idle_all_features memory utilization -0.09 [-0.18, +0.01] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
➖ otlp_ingest_logs memory utilization -0.20 [-0.32, -0.07] 1 Logs
➖ uds_dogstatsd_to_api_cpu % cpu utilization -0.43 [-1.32, +0.46] 1 Logs
➖ file_tree memory utilization -0.89 [-1.06, -0.73] 1 Logs

Bounds Checks: ✅ Passed

perf experiment bounds_check_name replicates_passed links
✅ docker_containers_cpu simple_check_run 10/10
✅ docker_containers_memory memory_usage 10/10
✅ docker_containers_memory simple_check_run 10/10
✅ file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
✅ file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
✅ file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 lost_bytes 10/10
✅ file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 memory_usage 10/10
✅ file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 lost_bytes 10/10
✅ file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 memory_usage 10/10
✅ file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
✅ file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load memory_usage 10/10
✅ file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
✅ file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
✅ file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
✅ file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
✅ file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
✅ file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
✅ quality_gate_idle intake_connections 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
✅ quality_gate_idle memory_usage 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
✅ quality_gate_idle_all_features intake_connections 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
✅ quality_gate_idle_all_features memory_usage 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
✅ quality_gate_logs intake_connections 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
✅ quality_gate_logs lost_bytes 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
✅ quality_gate_logs memory_usage 10/10 bounds checks dashboard

Explanation

Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%

Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:

  • ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
  • ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
  • ➖ = no significant change in performance

A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".

For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:

  1. Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.

  2. Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.

  3. Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".

CI Pass/Fail Decision

✅ Passed. All Quality Gates passed.

  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check lost_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.

@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Contributor

agent-platform-auto-pr bot commented Apr 17, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Static quality checks

❌ Please find below the results from static quality gates
Comparison made with ancestor a95af0e

Error

Quality gate Delta On disk size (MiB) Delta On wire size (MiB)
❌ agent_deb_amd64 $${+1.19}$$ $${698.2}$$ > $${697.37}$$ $${+0.29}$$ $${176.39}$$ < $${177.03}$$
❌ agent_deb_amd64_fips $${+1.19}$$ $${696.5}$$ > $${695.59}$$ $${+0.23}$$ $${175.74}$$ < $${176.51}$$
❌ agent_msi $${+2.74}$$ $${961.62}$$ > $${959.86}$$ $${+0.27}$$ $${146.55}$$ < $${147.27}$$
❌ agent_rpm_amd64 $${+1.19}$$ $${698.19}$$ > $${697.36}$$ $${+0.22}$$ $${177.91}$$ < $${178.56}$$
❌ agent_rpm_amd64_fips $${+1.19}$$ $${696.49}$$ > $${695.58}$$ $${+0.05}$$ $${177.63}$$ < $${178.43}$$
❌ agent_rpm_arm64 $${+1.16}$$ $${688.18}$$ > $${687.37}$$ $${+0.4}$$ $${161.51}$$ < $${161.99}$$
❌ agent_rpm_arm64_fips $${+1.16}$$ $${686.59}$$ > $${685.72}$$ $${+0.24}$$ $${160.49}$$ < $${161.11}$$
❌ agent_suse_amd64 $${+1.19}$$ $${698.19}$$ > $${697.36}$$ $${+0.22}$$ $${177.91}$$ < $${178.56}$$
❌ agent_suse_amd64_fips $${+1.19}$$ $${696.49}$$ > $${695.58}$$ $${+0.05}$$ $${177.63}$$ < $${178.43}$$
❌ agent_suse_arm64 $${+1.16}$$ $${688.18}$$ > $${687.37}$$ $${+0.4}$$ $${161.51}$$ < $${161.99}$$
❌ agent_suse_arm64_fips $${+1.16}$$ $${686.59}$$ > $${685.72}$$ $${+0.24}$$ $${160.49}$$ < $${161.11}$$
❌ docker_agent_amd64 $${+1.19}$$ $${781.99}$$ > $${781.16}$$ $${+0.35}$$ $${269.14}$$ < $${269.63}$$
❌ docker_agent_arm64 $${+1.16}$$ $${795.43}$$ > $${794.62}$$ $${+0.34}$$ $${256.48}$$ < $${257.0}$$
❌ docker_agent_jmx_amd64 $${+1.19}$$ $${973.18}$$ > $${972.35}$$ $${+0.33}$$ $${338.1}$$ < $${338.6}$$
❌ docker_agent_jmx_arm64 $${+1.16}$$ $${975.23}$$ > $${974.41}$$ $${+0.34}$$ $${321.42}$$ < $${321.97}$$
❌ docker_agent_windows1809 $${+2.85}$$ $${1489.76}$$ > $${1488.0}$$ $${+0.93}$$ $${488.62}$$ < $${488.95}$$
❌ docker_agent_windows1809_core $${+2.75}$$ $${6219.72}$$ > $${6218.0}$$ $${0}$$ $${2048.0}$$ < $${2049.0}$$
❌ docker_agent_windows1809_jmx $${+2.74}$$ $${1611.39}$$ > $${1609.5}$$ $${+0.61}$$ $${530.93}$$ < $${531.32}$$
❌ docker_agent_windows2022 $${+2.48}$$ $${1508.93}$$ > $${1507.0}$$ $${+0.58}$$ $${501.38}$$ < $${501.7}$$
❌ docker_agent_windows2022_core_jmx $${+2.69}$$ $${6314.42}$$ > $${6313.0}$$ $${0}$$ $${2048.0}$$ < $${2049.0}$$
❌ docker_agent_windows2022_jmx $${+2.23}$$ $${1630.46}$$ > $${1628.16}$$ $${+0.58}$$ $${543.64}$$ < $${543.98}$$
Gate failure full details
Quality gate Error type Error message
agent_deb_amd64 AssertionError Package size on disk (uncompressed package size) 7321178 is higher than the maximum allowed 731245445 by the gate !
agent_deb_amd64_fips AssertionError Package size on disk (uncompressed package size) 730330872 is higher than the maximum allowed 729378979 by the gate !
agent_msi AssertionError Package size on disk (uncompressed package size) 1008327286 is higher than the maximum allowed 1006486159 by the gate !
agent_rpm_amd64 AssertionError Package size on disk (uncompressed package size) 732106463 is higher than the maximum allowed 731234959 by the gate !
agent_rpm_amd64_fips AssertionError Package size on disk (uncompressed package size) 730319493 is higher than the maximum allowed 729368494 by the gate !
agent_rpm_arm64 AssertionError Package size on disk (uncompressed package size) 721612873 is higher than the maximum allowed 720759685 by the gate !
agent_rpm_arm64_fips AssertionError Package size on disk (uncompressed package size) 719946056 is higher than the maximum allowed 719029534 by the gate !
agent_suse_amd64 AssertionError Package size on disk (uncompressed package size) 732106463 is higher than the maximum allowed 731234959 by the gate !
agent_suse_amd64_fips AssertionError Package size on disk (uncompressed package size) 730319493 is higher than the maximum allowed 729368494 by the gate !
agent_suse_arm64 AssertionError Package size on disk (uncompressed package size) 721612873 is higher than the maximum allowed 720759685 by the gate !
agent_suse_arm64_fips AssertionError Package size on disk (uncompressed package size) 719946056 is higher than the maximum allowed 719029534 by the gate !
docker_agent_amd64 AssertionError Image size on disk (uncompressed image size) 819976940 is higher than the maximum allowed 819105628 by the gate !
docker_agent_arm64 AssertionError Image size on disk (uncompressed image size) 834073562 is higher than the maximum allowed 833219461 by the gate !
docker_agent_jmx_amd64 AssertionError Image size on disk (uncompressed image size) 1020457809 is higher than the maximum allowed 1019582873 by the gate !
docker_agent_jmx_arm64 AssertionError Image size on disk (uncompressed image size) 1022598807 is higher than the maximum allowed 1021742940 by the gate !
docker_agent_windows1809 AssertionError Image size on disk (uncompressed image size) 1562124257 is higher than the maximum allowed 1560281088 by the gate !
docker_agent_windows1809_core AssertionError Image size on disk (uncompressed image size) 6521853129 is higher than the maximum allowed 6520045568 by the gate !
docker_agent_windows1809_jmx AssertionError Image size on disk (uncompressed image size) 1689662899 is higher than the maximum allowed 1687683072 by the gate !
docker_agent_windows2022 AssertionError Image size on disk (uncompressed image size) 1582225516 is higher than the maximum allowed 1580204032 by the gate !
docker_agent_windows2022_core_jmx AssertionError Image size on disk (uncompressed image size) 6621152898 is higher than the maximum allowed 6619660288 by the gate !
docker_agent_windows2022_jmx AssertionError Image size on disk (uncompressed image size) 1709663968 is higher than the maximum allowed 1707249500 by the gate !

Static quality gates prevent the PR to merge! You can check the static quality gates confluence page for guidance. We also have a toolbox page available to list tools useful to debug the size increase.

Successful checks

Info

Quality gate Delta On disk size (MiB) Delta On wire size (MiB)
✅ agent_heroku_amd64 $${+0.47}$$ $${359.14}$$ < $${359.67}$$ $${+0.08}$$ $${96.6}$$ < $${97.47}$$
✅ docker_agent_windows1809_core_jmx $${+2.74}$$ $${6341.29}$$ < $${6361.0}$$ $${0}$$ $${2048.0}$$ < $${2049.0}$$
✅ docker_agent_windows2022_core $${+2.74}$$ $${6192.84}$$ < $${6311.0}$$ $${0}$$ $${2048.0}$$ < $${2049.0}$$
✅ docker_cluster_agent_amd64 $${+0.31}$$ $${213.15}$$ < $${213.79}$$ $${+0.08}$$ $${72.46}$$ < $${73.33}$$
✅ docker_cluster_agent_arm64 $${+0.34}$$ $${229.02}$$ < $${229.64}$$ $${+0.07}$$ $${68.73}$$ < $${69.6}$$
✅ docker_cws_instrumentation_amd64 $${0}$$ $${7.08}$$ < $${7.12}$$ $${-0}$$ $${2.95}$$ < $${3.29}$$
✅ docker_cws_instrumentation_arm64 $${0}$$ $${6.69}$$ < $${6.92}$$ $${+0}$$ $${2.7}$$ < $${3.07}$$
✅ docker_dogstatsd_amd64 $${+0.01}$$ $${39.23}$$ < $${39.57}$$ $${-0}$$ $${15.11}$$ < $${15.76}$$
✅ docker_dogstatsd_arm64 $${+0.02}$$ $${37.9}$$ < $${38.2}$$ $${-0}$$ $${14.53}$$ < $${14.83}$$
✅ dogstatsd_deb_amd64 $${+0.01}$$ $${30.45}$$ < $${31.4}$$ $${-0}$$ $${7.99}$$ < $${8.95}$$
✅ dogstatsd_deb_arm64 $${+0.01}$$ $${29.03}$$ < $${29.97}$$ $${-0}$$ $${6.94}$$ < $${7.89}$$
✅ dogstatsd_rpm_amd64 $${+0.01}$$ $${30.45}$$ < $${31.4}$$ $${-0.01}$$ $${8.0}$$ < $${8.96}$$
✅ dogstatsd_suse_amd64 $${+0.01}$$ $${30.45}$$ < $${31.4}$$ $${-0.01}$$ $${8.0}$$ < $${8.96}$$
✅ iot_agent_deb_amd64 $${+0.23}$$ $${50.66}$$ < $${51.38}$$ $${+0.05}$$ $${12.89}$$ < $${13.79}$$
✅ iot_agent_deb_arm64 $${+0.23}$$ $${48.13}$$ < $${48.85}$$ $${+0.05}$$ $${11.18}$$ < $${12.09}$$
✅ iot_agent_deb_armhf $${+0.21}$$ $${47.68}$$ < $${48.42}$$ $${+0.04}$$ $${11.24}$$ < $${12.16}$$
✅ iot_agent_rpm_amd64 $${+0.23}$$ $${50.66}$$ < $${51.38}$$ $${+0.05}$$ $${12.91}$$ < $${13.81}$$
✅ iot_agent_rpm_arm64 $${+0.23}$$ $${48.13}$$ < $${48.85}$$ $${+0.05}$$ $${11.2}$$ < $${12.11}$$
✅ iot_agent_suse_amd64 $${+0.23}$$ $${50.66}$$ < $${51.38}$$ $${+0.05}$$ $${12.91}$$ < $${13.81}$$

@paulcacheux paulcacheux force-pushed the paulcacheux/dd-trace-go-1.73.0 branch from 88560ef to 733885f Compare April 27, 2025 14:03
@paulcacheux paulcacheux changed the title bump dd-trace-go to v1.73.0 rc6 bump dd-trace-go to v1.73.0 rc9 Apr 27, 2025
@paulcacheux paulcacheux changed the title bump dd-trace-go to v1.73.0 rc9 bump dd-trace-go to v1.73.0 May 9, 2025
@paulcacheux paulcacheux force-pushed the paulcacheux/dd-trace-go-1.73.0 branch from 733885f to 3e666a5 Compare May 14, 2025 14:15
@paulcacheux paulcacheux changed the title bump dd-trace-go to v1.73.0 bump dd-trace-go to v1.73.1 May 14, 2025
@paulcacheux paulcacheux force-pushed the paulcacheux/dd-trace-go-1.73.0 branch from 3e666a5 to 3ff2c1a Compare May 28, 2025 11:12
@github-actions github-actions bot added long review PR is complex, plan time to review it and removed medium review PR review might take time labels May 28, 2025
@paulcacheux paulcacheux added changelog/no-changelog qa/done QA done before merge and regressions are covered by tests labels May 28, 2025
@paulcacheux paulcacheux force-pushed the paulcacheux/dd-trace-go-1.73.0 branch 2 times, most recently from 885b87d to d9e0b21 Compare May 28, 2025 20:10
@paulcacheux paulcacheux force-pushed the paulcacheux/dd-trace-go-1.73.0 branch from d9e0b21 to d9e334b Compare June 11, 2025 10:23
@paulcacheux paulcacheux force-pushed the paulcacheux/dd-trace-go-1.73.0 branch from d9e334b to d674d29 Compare June 16, 2025 12:42
@paulcacheux paulcacheux marked this pull request as ready for review June 16, 2025 12:47
@paulcacheux paulcacheux requested a review from a team as a code owner June 16, 2025 12:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
changelog/no-changelog long review PR is complex, plan time to review it qa/done QA done before merge and regressions are covered by tests team/agent-devx
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
1 participant
@paulcacheux