-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
Add optional CI job to run tests using nodetreemodel #37758
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Gitlab CI Configuration ChangesAdded Jobstests_nodetreemodeltests_nodetreemodel:
after_script:
- CODECOV_TOKEN=$($CI_PROJECT_DIR/tools/ci/fetch_secret.sh $CODECOV token) || exit
$?; export CODECOV_TOKEN
- dda inv -- -e coverage.upload-to-codecov $COVERAGE_CACHE_FLAG || true
allow_failure: true
artifacts:
expire_in: 2 weeks
paths:
- $TEST_OUTPUT_FILE
- junit-*.tgz
reports:
annotations:
- $EXTERNAL_LINKS_PATH
junit:
- '**/junit-out-*.xml'
when: always
before_script:
- source /root/.bashrc && conda activate $CONDA_ENV
- mkdir -p $GOPATH/pkg/mod/cache && tar xJf modcache.tar.xz -C $GOPATH/pkg/mod/cache
|| exit 101
- rm -f modcache.tar.xz
- dda inv -- -e rtloader.make --install-prefix=$CI_PROJECT_DIR/dev
- dda inv -- -e rtloader.install
- dda inv -- -e rtloader.format --raise-if-changed
- dda inv -- -e rtloader.test
image: registry.ddbuild.io/ci/datadog-agent-buildimages/rpm_x64$CI_IMAGE_RPM_X64_SUFFIX:$CI_IMAGE_RPM_X64
needs:
- go_deps
- go_tools_deps
rules:
- if: $RUN_UNIT_TESTS == "off"
when: never
- if: $CI_COMMIT_BRANCH == "main"
variables:
COVERAGE_CACHE_FLAG: --push-coverage-cache
FAST_TESTS: 'false'
- if: $CI_COMMIT_BRANCH =~ /^[0-9]+\.[0-9]+\.x$/
variables:
COVERAGE_CACHE_FLAG: ''
FAST_TESTS: 'false'
- if: $CI_COMMIT_TAG != null
variables:
COVERAGE_CACHE_FLAG: ''
FAST_TESTS: 'false'
- if: $CI_PIPELINE_SOURCE == "trigger" || $CI_PIPELINE_SOURCE == "pipeline"
variables:
COVERAGE_CACHE_FLAG: ''
FAST_TESTS: 'false'
- if: $RUN_UNIT_TESTS == "on"
variables:
COVERAGE_CACHE_FLAG: ''
FAST_TESTS: 'false'
- variables:
COVERAGE_CACHE_FLAG: --pull-coverage-cache
FAST_TESTS: 'true'
script:
- mkdir -p $GOPATH/pkg/mod/cache && tar xJf modcache_tools.tar.xz -C $GOPATH/pkg/mod/cache
|| exit 101
- rm -f modcache_tools.tar.xz
- dda inv -- -e install-tools
- dda inv -- -e gitlab.generate-ci-visibility-links --output=$EXTERNAL_LINKS_PATH
- FAST_TESTS_FLAG=""
- if [[ "$FAST_TESTS" == "true" ]]; then FAST_TESTS_FLAG="--only-impacted-packages";
fi
- dda inv -- -e sds.build-library
- dda inv -- -e agent.build
- dda inv -- -e test $FLAVORS --include-sds --race --profile --rerun-fails=2 --coverage
--cpus $KUBERNETES_CPU_REQUEST $EXTRA_OPTS --result-json $TEST_OUTPUT_FILE --junit-tar
"junit-${CI_JOB_NAME}.tgz" --build-stdlib $FAST_TESTS_FLAG --test-washer
stage: source_test
tags:
- arch:amd64
variables:
CONDA_ENV: ddpy3
DD_CONF_NODETREEMODEL: enable
EXTERNAL_LINKS_PATH: external_links_$CI_JOB_ID.json
FLAKY_PATTERNS_CONFIG: $CI_PROJECT_DIR/flaky-patterns-runtime.yaml
FLAVORS: --flavor base
KUBERNETES_CPU_REQUEST: 16
KUBERNETES_MEMORY_LIMIT: 16Gi
KUBERNETES_MEMORY_REQUEST: 16Gi
TEST_OUTPUT_FILE: test_output.json Changes Summary
ℹ️ Diff available in the job log. |
Static quality checks✅ Please find below the results from static quality gates Successful checksInfo
|
/merge |
View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.
This merge request is not mergeable yet, because of pending checks/missing approvals. It will be added to the queue as soon as checks pass and/or get approvals.
devflow unqueued this merge request: It did not become mergeable within the expected time |
Regression DetectorRegression Detector ResultsMetrics dashboard Baseline: 99942ff Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected
|
perf | experiment | goal | Δ mean % | Δ mean % CI | trials | links |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
➖ | quality_gate_logs | % cpu utilization | +1.15 | [-1.62, +3.93] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
➖ | docker_containers_memory | memory utilization | +0.99 | [+0.91, +1.07] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | otlp_ingest_logs | memory utilization | +0.60 | [+0.48, +0.73] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | quality_gate_idle_all_features | memory utilization | +0.30 | [+0.19, +0.42] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
➖ | uds_dogstatsd_20mb_12k_contexts_20_senders | memory utilization | +0.29 | [+0.22, +0.37] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency | egress throughput | +0.07 | [-0.54, +0.67] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency | egress throughput | +0.03 | [-0.58, +0.65] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency | egress throughput | +0.01 | [-0.58, +0.61] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | uds_dogstatsd_to_api | ingress throughput | +0.01 | [-0.26, +0.28] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude | ingress throughput | +0.00 | [-0.01, +0.01] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 | egress throughput | -0.01 | [-0.61, +0.59] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency | egress throughput | -0.02 | [-0.61, +0.57] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 | egress throughput | -0.04 | [-0.63, +0.55] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | tcp_syslog_to_blackhole | ingress throughput | -0.06 | [-0.12, +0.00] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load | egress throughput | -0.06 | [-0.29, +0.17] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | ddot_metrics | memory utilization | -0.08 | [-0.20, +0.03] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency | egress throughput | -0.09 | [-0.65, +0.47] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | ddot_logs | memory utilization | -0.11 | [-0.22, +0.01] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | otlp_ingest_metrics | memory utilization | -0.38 | [-0.54, -0.22] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | quality_gate_idle | memory utilization | -0.58 | [-0.63, -0.52] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
➖ | uds_dogstatsd_to_api_cpu | % cpu utilization | -0.76 | [-1.63, +0.11] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_tree | memory utilization | -1.17 | [-1.31, -1.03] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | docker_containers_cpu | % cpu utilization | -1.27 | [-4.31, +1.77] | 1 | Logs |
Bounds Checks: ✅ Passed
perf | experiment | bounds_check_name | replicates_passed | links |
---|---|---|---|---|
✅ | docker_containers_cpu | simple_check_run | 10/10 | |
✅ | docker_containers_memory | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | docker_containers_memory | simple_check_run | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | quality_gate_idle | intake_connections | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
✅ | quality_gate_idle | memory_usage | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
✅ | quality_gate_idle_all_features | intake_connections | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
✅ | quality_gate_idle_all_features | memory_usage | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
✅ | quality_gate_logs | intake_connections | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
✅ | quality_gate_logs | lost_bytes | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
✅ | quality_gate_logs | memory_usage | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
Explanation
Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%
Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:
- ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
- ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
- ➖ = no significant change in performance
A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".
For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:
-
Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.
-
Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.
-
Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".
CI Pass/Fail Decision
✅ Passed. All Quality Gates passed.
- quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_logs, bounds check lost_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_idle, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
What does this PR do?
Adds a CI job which runs the agent tests using the nodetreemodel implementation of the config.
This reverts #37735, reenabling #37698. We are disabling the junit test upload in this PR, which should prevent the failing CI from spamming test owners.
Motivation
Describe how you validated your changes
Possible Drawbacks / Trade-offs
Additional Notes