Not really a thing that needs to be done quickly, but at least it's something, and since those files are pretty much never modified, we can just leave this ready until we want to merge it.

Is it hard to make it one widget only, which resizes and then simply hides and shows the text depending on the widget size?

No, it should be easy, but I think @devvv4ever told me to have two different widgets, in case anyone wants a small widget with text

Also, does it need to be a circle?

Not technically, but I guess we can choose

No, it should be easy, but I think @devvv4ever told me to have two different widgets, in case anyone wants a small widget with text

You can add the same widget twice and resize one of the instances to be smaller. They will look differently, but have the same action. So in the end it'll have the same effect as creating two different ones. I think a second widget only makes sense if we want to add other functionality or show data, etc.

If you can manage to make the widget "responsive" in the sense of adapting text to to the user set size of the widget one widget would be good too. Speaking of: if the user sets it to 1x1 only display a sync button, and if it is large enough display an additional label. But it is of course more work to make the "one" widget more sophisticated ;-)

for example:
1x1 - only sync button
1x2 sync button with text "sync"
1x3...x with text "Synchronize".

I also think that users like to see these widget options as seen in your previews in the first posting here (which I definitely like!) - so they "see what they get" when choosing between the two options. But you decide :)

I also think that users like to see these widget options as seen in your previews in the first posting here (which I definitely like!) - so they "see what they get" when choosing between the two options. But you decide :)

I don't think we should do it, if it means maintaining three different widget code bases. If we're able to reuse the same code it could be an option.

I also think that users like to see these widget options as seen in your previews in the first posting here (which I definitely like!) - so they "see what they get" when choosing between the two options. But you decide :)

I don't think we should do it, if it means maintining three different widget code bases. If we're able to reuse the same code it could be an option.

It would not mean 3 widgets. Only two: one 1x1 fixed sync button widget without text and a second "resizeable" one with a label on it with min-size 1x2 and that can be enlargend as the user wishes.

Code looks ok. I can't resize the bigger 1x2 widget though.

The description of how the buttons look in the widget description is superfluous. The existing widgets on the emulator always have their user action as description, so I would do it the same way. I.E. for google drive it's: "Quickly access suggested files and search" and for google calendar: "View your tasks and upcoming events".

So instead of: "A circular button for running synchronization manually." and "A simple button for running synchronization manually with an icon and a label."

I would probably write this for both: "Tap to synchronize."

Also possible. I'd be fine with it, but how do people understand the difference for both widgets then?

@devvv4ever Maybe you also want to spin this up on the emulator too and see if it's what you imagined it to be like.

I can't since I have no Android studio to try it out myself

Also possible. I'd be fine with it, but how do people understand the difference for both widgets then?

They can see it :D Also it still says 1x1 or 2x1 for the size.

I might be wrong, but I don't think we need to think in terms of accessibility here - as in describing what the buttons look like, for visually impaired.

What is the status of the PR?

What is the status of the PR?

Well, it's a matter of deciding how we want to implement this. Either in the same widget with resizing options, or with two different widgets

What is the status of the PR?

Well, it's a matter of deciding how we want to implement this. Either in the same widget with resizing options, or with two different widgets

I think it's all good to have two widgets like @devvv4ever says, so the user can see that different sizes with/without text/label are available. We just need the 1x2 widget to be resizable to a bigger size and to change the text to what the widget does, rather than what the widget looks like.

Just an idea: Could we have one widget that

• is called " (resizable)"
• automatically shows the reconfiguration when added:

Then it should be quite clear that there are two configurations?

But the end it shouldn't matter much

automatically shows the reconfiguration when added

Then we have to add the config screen and all of that. Is it really worth it? (I don't mind working on it)

automatically shows the reconfiguration when added

Then we have to add the config screen and all of that. Is it really worth it? (I don't mind working on it)

maybe not for a first implementation ^^

Okay so just to be clear. Maybe we can have two widgets now (after fixing the resize issue), and then in a future, if we want, use a single widget with a config screen

Okay so just to be clear. Maybe we can have two widgets now (after fixing the resize issue), and then in a future, if we want, use a single widget with a config screen

And the text

I'm fine with everything 😄 Soo this can be merged?

I'm fine with everything 😄 Soo this can be merged?

No, changes are still missing. Just for focus I will repeat them here:

• Make 1x2 resizable horizontally (bigger)
• Change the widget description texts to describe what they can do, instead of how they look.
  Something similar to: "Tap to synchronize"

Updated description:

And allowed horizontal resize.