Skip to content

Add blog under m indiviadual #1190

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Add blog under m indiviadual #1190

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

MuhtasimTanmoy
Copy link

@MuhtasimTanmoy MuhtasimTanmoy commented May 9, 2025 •
edited by coderabbitai bot
Loading

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Added "Muhtasim Tanmoy" to the list of individual contributors in the documentation, including a link to their GitHub notebook repository.

@coderabbitai coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented May 9, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Walkthrough

A new contributor, Muhtasim Tanmoy, was added to the "Individuals/Group Contributors" section in the README file under the letter "M," along with a link to their GitHub notebook repository. No other changes were made to the document.

Changes

File Change Summary
README.md Added "Muhtasim Tanmoy" with a GitHub notebook link to the contributors list.

Poem

🐇
A new name joins the garden fair,
Muhtasim Tanmoy, with code to share.
The README grows, a little more bright,
With each new friend, the future feels right.
Hop, skip, and leap—our list takes flight!

Tip

⚡️ Faster reviews with caching
  • CodeRabbit now supports caching for code and dependencies, helping speed up reviews. This means quicker feedback, reduced wait times, and a smoother review experience overall. Cached data is encrypted and stored securely. This feature will be automatically enabled for all accounts on May 16th. To opt out, configure Review - Disable Cache at either the organization or repository level. If you prefer to disable all data retention across your organization, simply turn off the Data Retention setting under your Organization Settings.

Enjoy the performance boost—your workflow just got faster.

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot reviewed May 9, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
README.md (1)

471-471: Consider using markdown link syntax instead of bare URL
While the bare URL is consistent with existing entries, switching to [Name](URL) notation would improve readability and maintainability. If you agree, you might opt to update this and other entries in one go.

🧰 Tools
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)

471-471: Bare URL used
null

(MD034, no-bare-urls)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 50eab27 and f220392.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)
README.md

471-471: Bare URL used
null

(MD034, no-bare-urls)

🔇 Additional comments (1)
README.md (1)

471-471: New contributor entry is correctly placed and formatted
The entry for Muhtasim Tanmoy has been added under “M individuals” in the proper alphabetical position, matching the existing list style.

🧰 Tools
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)

471-471: Bare URL used
null

(MD034, no-bare-urls)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@coderabbitai coderabbitai[bot] coderabbitai[bot] left review comments

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
1 participant
@MuhtasimTanmoy