Skip to content

Mention nesting selector cannot match pseudo-elements #40545

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 27, 2025

Conversation

Josh-Cena
Copy link
Member

Fix #36888

@Josh-Cena Josh-Cena requested a review from a team as a code owner July 27, 2025 10:36
@Josh-Cena Josh-Cena requested review from estelle and removed request for a team July 27, 2025 10:36
@github-actions github-actions bot added Content:CSS Cascading Style Sheets docs size/s [PR only] 6-50 LoC changed labels Jul 27, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jul 27, 2025

Preview URLs

(comment last updated: 2025-07-27 11:13:41)

Copy link
Member

@estelle estelle left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. I prefer it without the "addressed in future" comment, so made a suggestion to remove it, but approvable with or without it. Thanks.

Co-authored-by: Estelle Weyl <estelle@openwebdocs.org>
@Josh-Cena
Copy link
Member Author

Sure. Based on my observations it seems to involve some major changes, so it may never happen anyway.

@Josh-Cena Josh-Cena merged commit cae447a into mdn:main Jul 27, 2025
8 checks passed
@Josh-Cena Josh-Cena deleted the nesting-pseudo branch July 27, 2025 11:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Content:CSS Cascading Style Sheets docs size/s [PR only] 6-50 LoC changed
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

The & CSS nesting selector has gotchas/footguns/confusing behaviors that should be documented
2 participants