Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 47.23926% with 86 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 80.09%. Comparing base (25d7328) to head (19dc024).

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #6785      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   80.40%   80.09%   -0.31%     
==========================================
  Files         233      233              
  Lines       17904    18050     +146     
==========================================
+ Hits        14395    14458      +63     
- Misses       3509     3592      +83     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Improving the test coverage

Looks good and trending in the right direction.
Let me know if you'd need some help with the typing/pyright/CI steps and I can help.
I think we can build on it going forward.

Some things to consider in the future that @ekzhu and I have discussed include

• streaming intermediate updates from long running tools. In essences tools could be agents themselves and it can be work streaming their intermediate updates so that other agents/UX can act on it. We can revisit this once MCP has a formal structure on how this should be done - see MCP proposals 776 and 383

• improving the "bus" for user input. MCP servers already support user input requests - it can be useful to explore how teams or agents can have a central user input "bus" where these sort of elicitation requests can be piped into (instead of adding a user proxy each time). A simple solution might be to allow BaseAgent agent have a input_function of sorts.