Export and import directives have several syntax variants.
In the previous article we saw a simple use, now letâs explore more examples.
Export before declarations
We can label any declaration as exported by placing export
before it, be it a variable, function or a class.
For instance, here all exports are valid:
// export an array
export let months = ['Jan', 'Feb', 'Mar','Apr', 'Aug', 'Sep', 'Oct', 'Nov', 'Dec'];
// export a constant
export const MODULES_BECAME_STANDARD_YEAR = 2015;
// export a class
export class User {
constructor(name) {
this.name = name;
}
}
Please note that export
before a class or a function does not make it a function expression. Itâs still a function declaration, albeit exported.
Most JavaScript style guides donât recommend semicolons after function and class declarations.
Thatâs why thereâs no need for a semicolon at the end of export class
and export function
:
export function sayHi(user) {
alert(`Hello, ${user}!`);
} // no ; at the end
Export apart from declarations
Also, we can put export
separately.
Here we first declare, and then export:
// ð say.js
function sayHi(user) {
alert(`Hello, ${user}!`);
}
function sayBye(user) {
alert(`Bye, ${user}!`);
}
export {sayHi, sayBye}; // a list of exported variables
â¦Or, technically we could put export
above functions as well.
Import *
Usually, we put a list of what to import in curly braces import {...}
, like this:
// ð main.js
import {sayHi, sayBye} from './say.js';
sayHi('John'); // Hello, John!
sayBye('John'); // Bye, John!
But if thereâs a lot to import, we can import everything as an object using import * as <obj>
, for instance:
// ð main.js
import * as say from './say.js';
say.sayHi('John');
say.sayBye('John');
At first sight, âimport everythingâ seems such a cool thing, short to write, why should we ever explicitly list what we need to import?
Well, there are few reasons.
- Explicitly listing what to import gives shorter names:
sayHi()
instead ofsay.sayHi()
. - Explicit list of imports gives better overview of the code structure: what is used and where. It makes code support and refactoring easier.
Modern build tools, such as webpack and others, bundle modules together and optimize them to speedup loading. They also remove unused imports.
For instance, if you import * as library
from a huge code library, and then use only few methods, then unused ones will not be included into the optimized bundle.
Import âasâ
We can also use as
to import under different names.
For instance, letâs import sayHi
into the local variable hi
for brevity, and import sayBye
as bye
:
// ð main.js
import {sayHi as hi, sayBye as bye} from './say.js';
hi('John'); // Hello, John!
bye('John'); // Bye, John!
Export âasâ
The similar syntax exists for export
.
Letâs export functions as hi
and bye
:
// ð say.js
...
export {sayHi as hi, sayBye as bye};
Now hi
and bye
are official names for outsiders, to be used in imports:
// ð main.js
import * as say from './say.js';
say.hi('John'); // Hello, John!
say.bye('John'); // Bye, John!
Export default
In practice, there are mainly two kinds of modules.
- Modules that contain a library, pack of functions, like
say.js
above. - Modules that declare a single entity, e.g. a module
user.js
exports onlyclass User
.
Mostly, the second approach is preferred, so that every âthingâ resides in its own module.
Naturally, that requires a lot of files, as everything wants its own module, but thatâs not a problem at all. Actually, code navigation becomes easier if files are well-named and structured into folders.
Modules provide a special export default
(âthe default exportâ) syntax to make the âone thing per moduleâ way look better.
Put export default
before the entity to export:
// ð user.js
export default class User { // just add "default"
constructor(name) {
this.name = name;
}
}
There may be only one export default
per file.
â¦And then import it without curly braces:
// ð main.js
import User from './user.js'; // not {User}, just User
new User('John');
Imports without curly braces look nicer. A common mistake when starting to use modules is to forget curly braces at all. So, remember, import
needs curly braces for named exports and doesnât need them for the default one.
Named export | Default export |
---|---|
export class User {...} |
export default class User {...} |
import {User} from ... |
import User from ... |
Technically, we may have both default and named exports in a single module, but in practice people usually donât mix them. A module has either named exports or the default one.
As there may be at most one default export per file, the exported entity may have no name.
For instance, these are all perfectly valid default exports:
export default class { // no class name
constructor() { ... }
}
export default function(user) { // no function name
alert(`Hello, ${user}!`);
}
// export a single value, without making a variable
export default ['Jan', 'Feb', 'Mar','Apr', 'Aug', 'Sep', 'Oct', 'Nov', 'Dec'];
Not giving a name is fine, because there is only one export default
per file, so import
without curly braces knows what to import.
Without default
, such an export would give an error:
export class { // Error! (non-default export needs a name)
constructor() {}
}
The âdefaultâ name
In some situations the default
keyword is used to reference the default export.
For example, to export a function separately from its definition:
function sayHi(user) {
alert(`Hello, ${user}!`);
}
// same as if we added "export default" before the function
export {sayHi as default};
Or, another situation, letâs say a module user.js
exports one main âdefaultâ thing, and a few named ones (rarely the case, but it happens):
// ð user.js
export default class User {
constructor(name) {
this.name = name;
}
}
export function sayHi(user) {
alert(`Hello, ${user}!`);
}
Hereâs how to import the default export along with a named one:
// ð main.js
import {default as User, sayHi} from './user.js';
new User('John');
And, finally, if importing everything *
as an object, then the default
property is exactly the default export:
// ð main.js
import * as user from './user.js';
let User = user.default; // the default export
new User('John');
A word against default exports
Named exports are explicit. They exactly name what they import, so we have that information from them; thatâs a good thing.
Named exports force us to use exactly the right name to import:
import {User} from './user.js';
// import {MyUser} won't work, the name must be {User}
â¦While for a default export, we always choose the name when importing:
import User from './user.js'; // works
import MyUser from './user.js'; // works too
// could be import Anything... and it'll still work
So team members may use different names to import the same thing, and thatâs not good.
Usually, to avoid that and keep the code consistent, thereâs a rule that imported variables should correspond to file names, e.g:
import User from './user.js';
import LoginForm from './loginForm.js';
import func from '/path/to/func.js';
...
Still, some teams consider it a serious drawback of default exports. So they prefer to always use named exports. Even if only a single thing is exported, itâs still exported under a name, without default
.
That also makes re-export (see below) a little bit easier.
Re-export
âRe-exportâ syntax export ... from ...
allows to import things and immediately export them (possibly under another name), like this:
export {sayHi} from './say.js'; // re-export sayHi
export {default as User} from './user.js'; // re-export default
Why would that be needed? Letâs see a practical use case.
Imagine, weâre writing a âpackageâ: a folder with a lot of modules, with some of the functionality exported outside (tools like NPM allow us to publish and distribute such packages, but we donât have to use them), and many modules are just âhelpersâ, for internal use in other package modules.
The file structure could be like this:
auth/
index.js
user.js
helpers.js
tests/
login.js
providers/
github.js
facebook.js
...
Weâd like to expose the package functionality via a single entry point.
In other words, a person who would like to use our package, should import only from the âmain fileâ auth/index.js
.
Like this:
import {login, logout} from 'auth/index.js'
The âmain fileâ, auth/index.js
exports all the functionality that weâd like to provide in our package.
The idea is that outsiders, other programmers who use our package, should not meddle with its internal structure, search for files inside our package folder. We export only whatâs necessary in auth/index.js
and keep the rest hidden from prying eyes.
As the actual exported functionality is scattered among the package, we can import it into auth/index.js
and export from it:
// ð auth/index.js
// import login/logout and immediately export them
import {login, logout} from './helpers.js';
export {login, logout};
// import default as User and export it
import User from './user.js';
export {User};
...
Now users of our package can import {login} from "auth/index.js"
.
The syntax export ... from ...
is just a shorter notation for such import-export:
// ð auth/index.js
// re-export login/logout
export {login, logout} from './helpers.js';
// re-export the default export as User
export {default as User} from './user.js';
...
The notable difference of export ... from
compared to import/export
is that re-exported modules arenât available in the current file. So inside the above example of auth/index.js
we canât use re-exported login/logout
functions.
Re-exporting the default export
The default export needs separate handling when re-exporting.
Letâs say we have user.js
with the export default class User
and would like to re-export it:
// ð user.js
export default class User {
// ...
}
We can come across two problems with it:
-
export User from './user.js'
wonât work. That would lead to a syntax error.To re-export the default export, we have to write
export {default as User}
, as in the example above. -
export * from './user.js'
re-exports only named exports, but ignores the default one.If weâd like to re-export both named and default exports, then two statements are needed:
export * from './user.js'; // to re-export named exports export {default} from './user.js'; // to re-export the default export
Such oddities of re-exporting a default export are one of the reasons why some developers donât like default exports and prefer named ones.
Summary
Here are all types of export
that we covered in this and previous articles.
You can check yourself by reading them and recalling what they mean:
- Before declaration of a class/function/â¦:
export [default] class/function/variable ...
- Standalone export:
export {x [as y], ...}
.
- Re-export:
export {x [as y], ...} from "module"
export * from "module"
(doesnât re-export default).export {default [as y]} from "module"
(re-export default).
Import:
- Importing named exports:
import {x [as y], ...} from "module"
- Importing the default export:
import x from "module"
import {default as x} from "module"
- Import all:
import * as obj from "module"
- Import the module (its code runs), but do not assign any of its exports to variables:
import "module"
We can put import/export
statements at the top or at the bottom of a script, that doesnât matter.
So, technically this code is fine:
sayHi();
// ...
import {sayHi} from './say.js'; // import at the end of the file
In practice imports are usually at the start of the file, but thatâs only for more convenience.
Please note that import/export statements donât work if inside {...}
.
A conditional import, like this, wonât work:
if (something) {
import {sayHi} from "./say.js"; // Error: import must be at top level
}
â¦But what if we really need to import something conditionally? Or at the right time? Like, load a module upon request, when itâs really needed?
Weâll see dynamic imports in the next article.
Comments
<code>
tag, for several lines â wrap them in<pre>
tag, for more than 10 lines â use a sandbox (plnkr, jsbin, codepenâ¦)